Jump to content

Spiral of Theodorus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by 76.226.83.204 (talk) at 18:15, 6 August 2024 (right triangle Construction: clarify that this is the only automedian right triangle, and regularize right triangle). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The spiral of Theodorus up to the triangle with a hypotenuse of

In geometry, the spiral of Theodorus (also called the square root spiral, Pythagorean spiral, or Pythagoras's snail)[1] is a spiral composed of right triangles, placed edge-to-edge. It was named after Theodorus of Cyrene.

Construction

[edit]

The spiral is started with an isosceles right triangle, with each leg having unit length. Another right triangle (which is the only automedian right triangle) is formed, with one leg being the hypotenuse of the prior right triangle (with length the square root of 2) and the other leg having length of 1; the length of the hypotenuse of this second right triangle is the square root of 3. The process then repeats; the th triangle in the sequence is a right triangle with the side lengths and 1, and with hypotenuse . For example, the 16th triangle has sides measuring , 1 and hypotenuse of .

History and uses

[edit]

Although all of Theodorus' work has been lost, Plato put Theodorus into his dialogue Theaetetus, which tells of his work. It is assumed that Theodorus had proved that all of the square roots of non-square integers from 3 to 17 are irrational by means of the Spiral of Theodorus.[2]

Plato does not attribute the irrationality of the square root of 2 to Theodorus, because it was well known before him. Theodorus and Theaetetus split the rational numbers and irrational numbers into different categories.[3]

Hypotenuse

[edit]

Each of the triangles' hypotenuses gives the square root of the corresponding natural number, with .

Plato, tutored by Theodorus, questioned why Theodorus stopped at . The reason is commonly believed to be that the hypotenuse belongs to the last triangle that does not overlap the figure.[4]

Overlapping

[edit]

In 1958, Kaleb Williams proved that no two hypotenuses will ever coincide, regardless of how far the spiral is continued. Also, if the sides of unit length are extended into a line, they will never pass through any of the other vertices of the total figure.[4][5]

Extension

[edit]
Colored extended spiral of Theodorus with 110 triangles

Theodorus stopped his spiral at the triangle with a hypotenuse of . If the spiral is continued to infinitely many triangles, many more interesting characteristics are found.

Growth rate

[edit]

Angle

[edit]

If is the angle of the th triangle (or spiral segment), then: Therefore, the growth of the angle of the next triangle is:[1]

The sum of the angles of the first triangles is called the total angle for the th triangle. It grows proportionally to the square root of , with a bounded correction term :[1] where (OEISA105459).

A triangle or section of spiral

Radius

[edit]

The growth of the radius of the spiral at a certain triangle is

Archimedean spiral

[edit]

The Spiral of Theodorus approximates the Archimedean spiral.[1] Just as the distance between two windings of the Archimedean spiral equals mathematical constant , as the number of spins of the spiral of Theodorus approaches infinity, the distance between two consecutive windings quickly approaches .[6]

The following table shows successive windings of the spiral approaching pi:

Winding No.: Calculated average winding-distance Accuracy of average winding-distance in comparison to π
2 3.1592037 99.44255%
3 3.1443455 99.91245%
4 3.14428 99.91453%
5 3.142395 99.97447%

As shown, after only the fifth winding, the distance is a 99.97% accurate approximation to .[1]

Continuous curve

[edit]
Philip J. Davis' analytic continuation of the Spiral of Theodorus, including extension in the opposite direction from the origin (negative nodes numbers).

The question of how to interpolate the discrete points of the spiral of Theodorus by a smooth curve was proposed and answered by Philip J. Davis in 2001 by analogy with Euler's formula for the gamma function as an interpolant for the factorial function. Davis found the function[7] which was further studied by his student Leader[8] and by Iserles.[9] This function can be characterized axiomatically as the unique function that satisfies the functional equation the initial condition and monotonicity in both argument and modulus.[10]

An analytic continuation of Davis' continuous form of the Spiral of Theodorus extends in the opposite direction from the origin.[11]

In the figure the nodes of the original (discrete) Theodorus spiral are shown as small green circles. The blue ones are those, added in the opposite direction of the spiral. Only nodes with the integer value of the polar radius are numbered in the figure. The dashed circle in the coordinate origin is the circle of curvature at .

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e Hahn, Harry K. (2007), The ordered distribution of natural numbers on the square root spiral, arXiv:0712.2184
  2. ^ Nahin, Paul J. (1998), An Imaginary Tale: The Story of , Princeton University Press, p. 33, ISBN 0-691-02795-1
  3. ^ Plato; Dyde, Samuel Walters (1899), The Theaetetus of Plato, J. Maclehose, pp. 86–87
  4. ^ a b Long, Kate, A Lesson on The Root Spiral, archived from the original on 11 April 2013, retrieved 30 April 2008
  5. ^ Teuffel, Erich (1958), "Eine Eigenschaft der Quadratwurzelschnecke", Mathematisch-Physikalische Semesterberichte zur Pflege des Zusammenhangs von Schule und Universität, 6: 148–152, MR 0096160
  6. ^ Hahn, Harry K. (2008), The distribution of natural numbers divisible by 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, and 17 on the square root spiral, arXiv:0801.4422
  7. ^ Davis (2001), pp. 37–38.
  8. ^ Leader, Jeffery James (1990), The generalized Theodorus iteration (PhD thesis), Brown University, p. 173, MR 2685516, ProQuest 303808219
  9. ^ In an appendix to (Davis 2001)
  10. ^ Gronau (2004). An alternative derivation is given in Heuvers, Moak & Boursaw (2000).
  11. ^ Waldvogel (2009).

Further reading

[edit]