Jump to content

Talk:Compound management

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by VastV0idInSpace0 (talk | contribs) at 18:01, 30 June 2024 (Assessment: banner shell, Pharmacology (Rater)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This page should remain, as "compound management" is an actual enterprise on which several companies and methods are founded.

Additionally, there are people who work specifically in compound management in industry (ie, that is their job description). See for example http://jobs.phds.org/job/11128/global-pharmaceutical/platform-and-compound/

For companies involved, see evotec http://www.evotec-rsil.com/services.html?gclid=CK3oyonKoJgCFQXGsgod5VZgmg There are other companies that specialize in compound management.

The NIH has contracted its own small molecular repository, which requires high-tech compound management (and is noted as such): http://mlsmr.glpg.com/MLSMR_HomePage/

There are specific and general-to-compound management conferences that go on every year, such as:

Compound Management & Integrity 2009

http://www.chemistry-conferences.com/2009/05/18%20-%2020%20Compound%20Management%20and%20Integrity%20(London%20-%20UK).htm

There are also specific journal articles on compound management:

http://www.jalajournal.com/article/S1535-5535(07)00354-1/


I do not see why "Compound Management" might be argued for deletion. It's an active vocation and a topic of research and method optimization.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Compound management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]