Talk:Juxtapoz

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles

Graffiti

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Graffiti, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to graffiti art, graffiti artists and all aspects of graffiti culture. Click Here for more information.GraffitiWikipedia:WikiProject GraffitiTemplate:WikiProject GraffitiGraffiti articles

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

This is the major magazine of an important 21st century art movement, it would be criminal to delete this article.

From the passage "Juxtapoz Art & Culture Magazine is a magazine created by painter Robert Williams to celebrate the genius of low brow art. " Art, like many other things, is subjective. To "celebrate the genius" of anything assumes everyone will agree that genius is involved which is just not realistic. I would suggest changing this one word. William (Bill) Bean 13:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

I'm concerned about the tone of this article. It seems to be a paean, rather than an NPOV article. It's filled with unsourced views of how great or important the magazine is. --Nat Gertler (talk) 03:07, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability?

I added the notability tag to this article because its references are subpar. Of the three available, one is decent, one is a one sentence mention of Juxtapoz in a bio of the founder, and the last is a link to a blog post. I will delete that blog post ref if there are no objections as it is a non-encyclopedic source. The result is a lot of unsourced statements and questionable notablity. John Milito (talk) 17:39, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the blog reference. It looks like notability is not the issue, this article simply needs more reliable sources. John Milito (talk) 17:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]