Planned Parenthood Arizona v. Mayes
Planned Parenthood Arizona, et al. v. Mayes | |
---|---|
Court | Arizona Supreme Court |
Full case name | Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc., Successor-in-interest to Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc., Laura Conover, Pima County Attorney, appellants, v. Kristin K. Mayes, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Appelee, and Eric Hazelbrigg, M.D., as guardian Ad Litem of unborn child Jane Doe and all other unborn infants similarly situated; Dennis McGrane, Yavapai County Attorney, Intervenors |
Decided | April 9, 2024 |
Verdict | 4-2 |
Citation | CV-23-0005-PR |
Case history | |
Appealed from | Superior Court of Pima County, No. C127867 |
Appealed to | Court of Appeals, Division 2, 254 Ariz. 401 (App. 2022) |
Argument | Oral argument |
Court membership | |
Chief judge | Robert M. Brutinel |
Associate judges | |
Case opinions | |
Decision by | Lopez joined by Bolick, King, Beene |
Dissent | Timmer joined by Brutinel |
Montgomery took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-3603, 36-2322 | |
Superseded by | |
Arizona HB 2677 (in part) |
Planned Parenthood Arizona, et al. v. Kris Mayes is an Arizona Supreme Court case in which the court upheld an 1864 law criminalizing abortions except to save the life of the mother.[1]
On April 9, 2024, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled in Planned Parenthood of Arizona v. Mayes that the 1864 law could be enforced, to take effect 14 days later, but with no retroactive enforcement.[2] As a result, abortion in Arizona became illegal, except for when it is "necessary to save" the life of the pregnant individual.[3][4] There are no exceptions for rape or incest, and the legally prescribed sentence for assisting in an illegal abortion is 2-5 years in prison.[3][4]
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes, a Democrat, responded to the Arizona Supreme Court decision by declaring that "as long as I am Attorney General, no woman or doctor will be prosecuted under this draconian law in this state."[5] Mayes criticized the Arizona Supreme Court for having "risked the health and lives of Arizonans", after "effectively striking down a law passed this century and replacing it with one from 160 years ago ... when Arizona wasn't a state, the Civil War was raging, and women couldn't even vote".[5]
Arizona for Abortion Access, a campaign intending to introduce a November 2024 ballot proposal to protect abortion within the Arizona Constitution, is gathering signatures up to July 2024 for their petition to introduce the amendment.[6][7]
References
- ^ Paquette, Danielle; Hennessy-Fiske, Molly (April 9, 2024). "Arizona Supreme Court ruling clears way for near-total abortion ban". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
- ^ Stern, Ray; Barchenger, Stacey. "Abortion in Arizona set to be illegal in nearly all circumstances, state high court rules". The Arizona Republic. Archived from the original on April 9, 2024. Retrieved 2024-04-09.
- ^ a b Von Quednow, Cindy; Maxouris, Christina; Mascarenhas, Lauren (April 9, 2024). "Arizona Supreme Court rules state must adhere to century-old law banning nearly all abortions". CNN. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
- ^ a b Billeaud, Jacques; Snow, Anita (April 10, 2024). "Arizona can enforce an 1864 law criminalizing nearly all abortions, court says". Associated Press. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
- ^ a b Grenoble, Ryan (April 9, 2024). "Arizona Attorney General Says She Wouldn't Enforce 'Unconscionable' Abortion Ban". The Huffington Post. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
- ^ "Sign The Petition". Arizona for Abortion Access. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
- ^ Cathey, Libby; Oppenheim, Oren (April 10, 2024). "Arizona abortion ruling, which Democrats decry, splits Republicans and abortion opponents". ABC News. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
External link
- Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc., v. Kristin K. Mayes (2024), Text.