Jump to content

Talk:Unit 669

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 10:40, 28 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Aviation}}, {{WikiProject Israel}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

File:Coat of arms of the Israeli Air Force.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Coat of arms of the Israeli Air Force.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unit literal name

[edit]

Please see how the unit is referred to in Hebrew official IAF website.77.127.83.166 (talk) 20:45, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In case you didn't noticed and/or forgot to check, I have reverted to an earlier version without the mentioning of the "669 children" (twice!) before you reverted it to the wrong version. In future, please check before you make any silly assumption. Thank you~! -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 21:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dave1185 hello, your first revision included a change to the units oofficial name in Hebrew, your revision includes the adjective "קרבי"-"combat", however it doesn't appear in the IAF websiet but the other name...77.127.83.166 (talk) 23:30, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You wholesale reverted my edit twice, when actually your concern was limited to two parts of the article page that you could fix separately but you chose the easy way out and now you're blaming me for your own folly. That is very rude. -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 21:08, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing that can't be fixed in an edit...no need atributing mischievous intentions to an inocent act.77.127.83.166 (talk) 05:53, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]