Talk:Sheffield Central Library

Sheffield Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sheffield, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sheffield on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SheffieldWikipedia:WikiProject SheffieldTemplate:WikiProject SheffieldSheffield articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Sheffield Central Library is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

re: the merger. I would suggest not, particularly since Graves Art Gallery is actually the longer article! I think they should stay as separate articles. L.J.Skinner^{wot|I did} 16:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No response in over a month, so I shall remove the merge templates. L.J.Skinner^{wot|I did} 23:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsensical revert

This revert, with the edit summary "Rermove (sic) coord - use coor title d until coord has full functions" makes no sense - {{coord}} already has "full functions" - far more, in fact, than coor title d has. Andy Mabbett 12:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Lewis's sensible revert. It is not agreed that {{coord}} has full functions - see ongoing discussion at MOS talk. -- roundhouse 15:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh As I've already told you, in more than one discussion, and above, {{coord}} has all the functions of coor title d, and many more besides. It's already being used on tens of thousands of articles. Andy Mabbett 15:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh indeed. Let consensus emerge, let a bot do it. -- roundhouse 15:59, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates

The coordinates have just been removed from the infobox, with the edit summary "fix". What was broken? Andy Mabbett 12:18, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coord

For the record, on this talk page, I object to the replacement of coor title d with coord until the position re Google is demonstrably resolved.

I also object to duplication - the appearance of the coordinates both in the title and the infobox. -- roundhouse 12:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andy, can you fix the infobox so that the coordinates row does not display (as discussed many times)? A library is not a landmark and does not need coords in the infobox. I have no problem otherwise with the precision or coord. -- roundhouse0 20:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with either your unfounded assertion that the City's main library (nor, indeed, any library) is not a landmark, nor your personal aesthetic preference. The template is designed to include coordinates. Since nothing is broken, there is nothing to "fix". Andy Mabbett 10:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whence this obsession with coordinates? Why do we need them twice in a brief article about a library? -- roundhouse0 11:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The other objection (apart from needless duplication) to coords in the infobox is that they appear at 90% in the title and clash with the hoz line (in Firefox, default skin, and Opera, ditto). -- roundhouse0 12:29, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sheffield Central Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070208191507/http://www.sheffield.gov.uk/in-your-area/libraries/find/central to http://www.sheffield.gov.uk/in-your-area/libraries/find/central

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:48, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]