Talk:NCCERT

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Medicine: Emergency Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Emergency medicine and EMS task force (assessed as Low-importance).

What this is not

Wikipedia is not a place to host a secondary webpage for the group. It is not merely here to look pretty. If there are tags put on the page for deficiencies in the article, you need to leave them in place until that is rectified. Do not remove them simply because you don't like how they look! There is absolutely no excuse for not following Wikipedia guidelines simply because you like the group and want the page to look like it has no issues at all when it actually does.

Per WP:BRD, I am discussing recent reversions here, instead of simply re-reverting as some have done. Please explain why certain tags were simply removed. It is NOT wrong to mark a page as having no inline citations when, in fact, the article does not actually have any inline citations!

When other editors besides your team run across this article, they will either correct it or put a tag on the page to mark deficiencies. That is how Wikipedia works. Now that some of you have mentioned that you work on the team, some other editor could place a conflict of interest tag on there. If they do, DO NOT SIMPLY REMOVE IT!

If you really can't find any third-party reliable sources out there, then we really have to question whether this article is notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. I'll try to find any articles on the group and you should too. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 16:50, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hatnotes

I have left this article alone for nearly a year now hoping someone else would run across it and do some cleanup. Anyway, even if anyone insists on controlling the article, Wikipedia guidelines should be followed. My most recent edits do follow guidelines in taking out inappropriate external links. Also, again, please note that putting a tag on the article for any reason doesn't mean that the article is going to be automatically deleted. Tags should stay on until the problems with the article is fixed. Do NOT simply remove the tags because you don't like how they look. This is NOT a personal webpage for the group. Thank you. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 15:32, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]