Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Categories for discussion‎ | Log

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (talk | contribs) at 09:41, 24 December 2023 (→‎Category:Cultural depictions of female monarchs: Relisted on 2023 December 24 (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
< December 14
December 16 >

December 15[edit]

Category:Fictional Tamil people[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 24#Category:Fictional Tamil people

Category:Fictional indigenous people of the United States[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Fictional American people by ethnicity. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 19:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose AHI-3000 (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support in principle, but it should be dual merged to Fictional indigenous North American people as well. AHI, if you want to actually keep this category, you need to actually explain your argument. Mason (talk) 02:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I notice that User:AHI-3000 removed Category:Fictional indigenous North American people from the Native Americans subcategory which is particularly unhelpful. So the Native Americans subcategory has to be added back to Category:Fictional indigenous North American people indeed. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted that for Category:Fictional Native American people, as disruptive action while a discussion is going on. The Native Hawaiian category is already in Category:Fictional Polynesian people, which AHI considers to be indigenous Oceanian people (despite also having geography-based children that do not only contain indigenous islanders}}, so that category is not needed there. Place Clichy (talk) 03:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. This intermediate level is not useful at all for navigation, and the well-designed proposition does not remove any information. Place Clichy (talk) 03:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional Chinese people by ethnicity[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories. A dual merge is not needed, both subcategories are already directly in Category:Fictional people by ethnicity. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Mason (talk) 04:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Domestic workers from Bohemia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Single merge because the only person in here is a courtier, not a domestic worker Mason (talk) 22:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Misanthrope Wikipedians[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 19:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Attack category (but G10 was declined). Utterly lacks collaborative value. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Utterly lacks collaborative value". That's just your subjective opinion. And well, who exactly am I attacking? Humans? No it's not an attack. And this is silky micromanaging. — Python Drink (talk) 22:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • As I indicated in my reply to you on my talk page, that CSD doesn't apply to me coz my page isn't an article. That's why your G10 didn't work. — Python Drink (talk) 23:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The latter is not opinion-based, these are editors willing to collaborate on United States-related topics. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, I'm glad we agree the first is opinion-based (if it's positive atheism). So we're deleting it right? Along with Category:Nihilist Wikipedians, the subject of which is just as villified as misanthropy? And the myriads of other categories along the lines of "Wikipedians who like [genre of music or film or book and so on] — Python Drink (talk) 23:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Honestly, I may well support deleting many of those too. There are a large number of user categories of questionable value, that doesn't justify creating more. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Not defining. Mason (talk) 04:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. So can we like just let it be, please? We don't have to be so strict. It's actually quite hypocritical. And if we wanna die on this hill, we'd have to do a complete revamp of Wikipedia — Python Drink (talk) 00:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:User nan-l-0[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 19:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 0-level categories are not allowed per longstanding precedent. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh sorry, I wasn't aware that this was discussed in the past. Does this only cover the category or also the level 0 userbox as well? Ganmatthew (talk • contribs) 19:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Only the category. The userbox is fine per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User qwh-0, although I personally do not see the point of its existence. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Universal Pictures Princess[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Universal Pictures characters and Category:Fictional princesses. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Feels very much like an WP:ARBITRARYCAT. No real good merge target. Not an actual brand unlike Category:Disney Princess characters. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Category:Universal Pictures characters. Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:LGBT by region[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 19:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: by location is the usual container category for continents, countries and regions. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
support per nom Mason (talk) 02:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Human rights under the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Human rights in the Middle East. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 19:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory and one article. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:44, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
support per nom Mason (talk) 02:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Women's rights by region[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 19:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. The subcategory is already part of Category:Women's rights in Asia. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
support per nom Mason (talk) 02:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Internet censorship by region[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Internet censorship. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 19:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Mason (talk) 04:18, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Post Soviet states[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 19:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, the intention is apparently to group post Soviet states, but that is not something that we normally do. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Marcocapelle, a sort of related point about the Soviet Union categories: should they not be named as former countries are. Like the Russian Empire categories are, for example, Category:People from the Russian Empire, should it not be Category:People from the Soviet Union rather than Category:Soviet people. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:English tennis people[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:English sportspeople by sport. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: has only one category layer. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:English tennis people by county[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename all as nominated. For clarity, Category:Tennis players from Greater London currently redirects to Category:Tennis people from Greater London; consensus here is to overwrite the redirect. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 19:59, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Contains only tennis players AND is better for navigation. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Rename the rest but merge Category:Tennis people from Greater London to the redirect of Category:Tennis players from Greater London. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
support per nom Mason (talk) 02:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:German tennis people by state[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 19:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Contains only players AND makes navigation easier. Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
support per nom Mason (talk) 02:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Australian tennis players by state or territory[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Contains only players and is consistant with the category name. Also, I would not advise mixing ALL tennis people in one category as it makes navigation harder. Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Rename the rest but merge Category:Tennis people from Western Australia with the redirect of Category:Tennis players from Western Australia. Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
support per nom Mason (talk) 02:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Establishments in Gran Colombia by century[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, there is no reason to diffuse by century because the country existed for only 12 years. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Mason (talk) 22:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chechen criminals[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:11, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Merge as this is an intersection between ethnicity and criminality, which is isn't ok Mason (talk) 06:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dual merge per nom. It would be different for Chechen independence fighters but that is not what this category is primarily about. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cultural depictions of female monarchs[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 24#Category:Cultural depictions of female monarchs

Category:Establishments in the Kingdom of Dahomey by century[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 19:47, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There is no "Establishments in the Kingdom of Dahomey" either rename or upmerge to Events in the Kingdom of Dahomey Mason (talk) 03:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Proslavery activists killed in the American Civil War[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining intersection. It's interesting, but there's not a need to intersect pro-slavery activists who are killed during a specific war. It's the same issue as Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_October_29#Category:Slave_traders_killed_in_the_American_Civil_War Mason (talk) 03:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ancient Chinese LGBT people[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Mason (talk) 03:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining intersection. Mason (talk) 00:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Changed my mind, after seeing that there are other ancient LGBT categories Mason (talk) 03:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Gran Colombia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overlapping category. This country lasted from 1819 until 1831. There's only one person (Mary English (Anglo-Colombian)) who isn't also in the child category Category:Presidents of Gran Colombia‎. Furthermore, "Gran Colombia" isn't ever mentioned on her page Mason (talk) 00:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cricketers from the Dominion of Newfoundland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: dual merge to Category:Dominion of Newfoundland people and Category:Cricketers from Newfoundland and Labrador. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 19:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: underpopulated category. only category member is described as a "Newfoundlander" not a "Dominion of Newfoundland" cricketer etc. Same situation as Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_November_22#Category:Journalists_from_the_Dominion_of_Newfoundland Mason (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Caribbean Rhodes Scholars[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Rhodes Scholars. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 19:44, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unhelpful for navigation to isolate caribean people from the other rhodes scholars. Mason (talk) 00:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, the parent category has been diffused by nationality only. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Newfoundland Rhodes Scholars[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Canadian Rhodes Scholars. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 19:44, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Intersection between region and award is not defining. The USA doesn't have subcategories by state. Category:American Rhodes Scholars Mason (talk) 00:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That might work too, and would require some purging. - RevelationDirect (talk) 15:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge The category header contains (unsourced) information the Rhodes Scholarship article does not: "Starting in 1902, the Dominion of Newfoundland was accorded Rhodes Scholarships as its own geographic constituency." Even assuming that's true, having a separate category up until 1949 when Newfoundland formally joined Canada might make sense but that's not what's going on here: the articles don't normally give a date of receiving the scholarship and based on my guessing with birth dates, this includes post-1949 winners. In practice, this just appears to be a provincial category and fails WP:OCLOCATION. - RevelationDirect (talk) 15:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Businesspeople from the Dominion of Newfoundland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: dual merge to Category:Businesspeople from Newfoundland and Labrador and Category:Dominion of Newfoundland people. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 19:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge: intersection between regime and occupation is not defining. Similar situation to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 22#Category:Journalists from the Dominion of Newfoundland Mason (talk) 00:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_December_15&oldid=1191568485"