Jump to content

User talk:Lenin and McCarthy/archive1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:Lenin and McCarthy

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:15, 3 April 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

Hello, Lenin and McCarthy/archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair 11:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just have to mention that wow, I like your username! -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 07:36, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Complaint

Encyclopeidas are meant to be informative and give out accurate representations of historical and current events they are not supposed to give a briefs summary of what has happened and are not supposed to misinform the reader of what is occuring or has occured. as the encyclopedia is an online encyclopedia space is not an issue as it would be for other encyclopedias such as the encyclopedia britannica. so your sliiming doiwn of all pages is loonacy and without merit or bases

this is beyond personal i respect nothing you do you want the worst of the worst on the internet and this is your way to prevent the truth about what happened form being ther you want to standardize and remove information from an encyclopedia the whole point of an encyclopedia is to be informative and give all the information.Lucy-marie 18:06, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This was originally added to my userpage. Lenin & McCarthy 19:55, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oi why'd you delete my page? Reihillrog

Informal Mediation requested

I have requested informal mediation for our dispute 2006-05-30 Razer (Robot) Mediation Cabal Lucy-marie 13:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy-Marie, after I declined a request to fully-protect some of the Robot Wars pages, told me on my talk page that she "will not instagate a new round of this war".

Given this, do you think you could make a similar pledge not to restart the edit war in return until the dispute is resolved? Both of you seem to be willing to take steps towards that even if the form of dispute resolution hasn't been fixed yet. --Sam Blanning(talk) 13:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi folks. Lucy-Marie has asked for my help with resolving the dispute over the Razer (robot) article. As a first step, please could you post a brief summary of your view on the disagreement on the 2006-05-30 Razer (Robot) mediation page so I can get a feel for where the situation lies. Kcordina Talk 14:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bat-template

Thanks for that edit. I'm not adding it to pages yet, just so I could revisit in a week or so after I started it, and see what it lacked. You filled a LOT of holes in the template. If you want to start adding it, go for it. I modelled it on the Template:Superman.ThuranX 01:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I think we can start putting it out there, and let others take a crac kat improving it. Just keep an eye on it, so we don't get clowns dropping EVERY SINGLE storyline, LOL
Please take a look at the Template. A pair of editors intent on reducing the screen size of the template have edited it down to the point where it's nearly useless. I've tried to work with them, but one in particular is intent on reducing it further and further and further. I could use your opinion.ThuranX 17:05, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Anytime, man. I replied under this section, because this was the page that I first said that in regard to. Yeah, I like your editing style and your calm, good faith mannered way of doing it. I need to make up a list of editors I respect on my userpage, I think. ThuranX 22:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Punisher 2

This article's been nominated for deletion. If one future comics film goes, more will follow. I'd like some help tightening it up. Thanks. ThuranX 23:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Closing Time

Glad you liked it. I've been wanting to add screenshots to the B&B ep articles for a while now. - Chadbryant 12:59, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two-Face

There's a debate about an image over at Talk:Two-Face#Straw_Poll. I'd appreciate your thoughts. Thanks. ThuranX 03:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Superman DVD covers

Please leave the DVD covers. They show the easiest way for contemporary audiences to view the films. The posters provide no familiarity. Since these films are not modern, the most appropriate images are the DVD covers. --CmdrClow 05:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:B & B

Hey, sorry about that...But thanks for helpin' me out with that. I can't do it all.--Suit-n-tieWhat Have I Done?! 00:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jigsaw

I think parody sections are irrevelant to the article. That, and stuff like webcomics are not relevant enough to be featured in an article. And if anything, it'd be better suited to Billy's article.--CyberGhostface 13:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cold Cold Heart

The source for that comment was an email sent to me by a press officer from the BBC's press office. As I'm new to Wikipedia, i wasn't sure how you could quote such a source. any help would be appreciated. if you like i could forward the email to you.--MintyGreen 09:48, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Borat

I saw you nominated Borat for assessment as a good article. I posted some comments on the talk page of the Borat article. - Ilse@ 13:12, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SH images

I'm sure those images are ok (there were about 20 of them in total, not just the bill skins fifth one). I took those images myself. Didn't steal them from anywhere at all. --Thaddius 00:30, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll wait until it becomes an issue, which it isn't really. Feel free to do it yourself though. --Thaddius 00:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
For future reference {{game-screenshot}} is the template for game screenshots. You'll note that all the screenshots I uploaded contain this template. --Thaddius 15:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well if the influences page is deleted then there will be no rationale at all. All that work for nothing. You'll note I haven't uploaded the rest of my images, which cover about 90% of the remaining points. If the page is deleted, I won't bother. --Thaddius 15:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When it comes to those images, I understand your concerns about fair use, yet many have criticized those influences points as unprovable without images as PresidentEvil's study guide on gamefaqs (where most of these points are listed) has been rejected as a source many-a-time. This is my effort to keep SOME of these points alive and well as I feel they are interesting and significant to the game article. If the influences page DOES end up being deleted I will be forced to move most of those points back into the SH page, but severely cut down as no one wants another list there. Right now I'm caught between numerous editors on both sides criticizing both having the influences on the main SH1 page and the influences as their own page. There really is no 'win-win' situation for all these people. Either the points stay off of wikipedia, or one of these two groups is going to be disappointed.

As for images from SH2, I am getting all these images from SH1 using a PSX emulator and sadly SH2 is for PS2, not PSX\PS1, so I cannot guarantee my ability to get those images for you. I can TRY if you want cause there are PS2 emulators, but the chances of there beings graphics glitches are much higher (you'll notice that two of my SH1 images are rather buggy looking while others are almost too crisp for the PSX hardware). Again if you want me to look into it, I can, but I'll have to get back to you on it. --Thaddius 15:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SH2

I'm sure that's a viable source because it's IGN. There are those that might be a little uppity since IGN has made mistakes in the past, but I won't contest it. --Thaddius 17:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As for the two links you showed me, the first is a dead link (gamefaqs doesn't work right sometimes, I'll check it out in greater detail later) and the second, about the video for the scariest game thing, is a youtube-like video, yes, but it is the episode of x-play where they determine that SH2 is the scariest game. And since it seems to be from the G4 website... I think that's the best source you can have since its from their mouth. --Thaddius 14:55, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SH2 requested pic

Can't get it for you man. SH2 does not work on the emulator. Best I could do was find Image:Nursedemon.jpg image that was already uploaded and on the SH creatures page. I'll let you know if I find anything else though. --Thaddius 02:29, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I never said anything about Lynch and the Book of Lost Memories. I've never read\seen the book so I can't verify that for you. --Thaddius 19:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SH2 GA thoughts

I hacked my own part to it and tried to clean up some of the references and misplaced in-line citations. I removed one bit in the influences section because the article was no longer live. The reaction section still needs some expansion. The best thing I can do is point you to other reception sections - check out MGS3's reception section - it's expanded and describes in a couple of paragraphs what the reviewers liked and didn't like. I also wrote the reception section for Super Princess Peach, which passed GA a few months ago. Hbdragon88 22:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Borat

Responded on my talk page.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 14:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is the movie "The Queen" fictional?

Hi. You added Tony Blair to the list of real people appearing in fictional context, which is very well, but one entry was the movie The Queen. I haven't seen that movie, but I was under the impression that it was not a fictional story but a dramatization of actual events following the death of Princess Diana. If so, it should not be listed on the list of real people appearing in fictional context. What's your impression of the movie? John Anderson 12:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Enemies of Batman

A tag has been placed on Category:Enemies of Batman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted in a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Category:Enemies of Batman is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on [[Talk:Category:Enemies of Batman]] saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. H. Carver 20:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Briarpatch Network

Thank you, vigilant new pages patroller, for tagging the article. I'll work on it. -- Paul (User:Lpgeffen) 21:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

People on Sunday

Seems you're greased lightning with the stubs tag. I've finished creating the page now; it looks fine to me. Great username, by the way! --Quywompka 12:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gomusic

You tagged the article while I was creating it, I left the tags, but I did post the site's url so that you know it's geniune. BuickCenturyDriver 10:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Saw victims is up for deletion.

Category:Saw victims is up for deletion. Feel free to comment on the discussion if you want to share your opinion. Thanks.--CyberGhostface 00:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really sorry about all this...I didn't know that the articles would be deleted as well. Maybe we can find others to defend our cause?--CyberGhostface 18:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just notified the House of Jigsaw forums.--CyberGhostface 18:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fahrenheit 451 (2007 film)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Fahrenheit 451 (2007 film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 17:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey there, speedy

Hello,

I came across some of your remarkably efficient work while helping another editor. I'd like to take a moment to encourage you to, when tagging articles under WP:CSD, please consider that new pages are just that -- new pages. Sometimes the author may need more than five minutes to establish notability or context, especially if they are new to Wikipedia.

Your desire to keep Wikipedia tidy is commendable. Thanks for also considering how policy can seem to WP:BITE new editors, potentially depriving Wikipedia of valuable future contributions.

Cheers, —Adrian~enwiki (talk) 2007-02-17 11:06Z

Manos articles

That would be a good solution, since "Manos" is notable, but the actors and characters are not notable independently of "Manos". If you're going to do the merging, make sure that all sourced information is reincorporated into the main article. Thanks! - Chardish 22:20, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lenin and McCarthy

That is the best username I've seen this month! Thanks for giving me a smile today. Thomas Dzubin Talk 18:29, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto ,just came by to same it made me laugh you should get a pic on the two of them for your user page :) (Gnevin 00:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I, too, find this name to be most excellent. Eris Discord | Talk 00:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One more thumbs-up for the user name Delfeye 20:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would think all fans of mc carthy like the name and i think it is ridiculous. ofcourse it made me laugh but i dont think it is of an unbiased excellence. Just to let ppl know one might also think this name is creepy.77.251.179.188 12:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Batman: Triumphant

Thanks for catching that. I've swapped out the prod template with a db-repost. EvilCouch 17:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Los Hermanos (Detroit)

Come on, don't delete my page, Los Hermanos are a tremendously influencial musical group. Half the music in the charts wouldn't be there if it wasn't for detroit techno. Instead, give me some tips on how to improve the page. Danielivatt 18:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Home beyond the sun

I removed the copyrighted info and replaced it. --L8K 15:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hob Nob Anyone?

I don't understand the claim for this to be deleted. Please explain further. Jimster 260 22:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated links and put references on. Much better now. Jimster 260 22:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red Hammer Test

Is there another article that discusses this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anthonynow12 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Possible answer to your question about LB:EF

You asked, "why didn't this page have an actual gameplay section before this point?" My guess is that some editors were more concerned with putting in as much criticism of the game as possible, and others (admittedly, that includes myself) were more concerned with balancing out that criticism. Of course, your question was probably rhetorical and you weren't really looking for an answer.  ;) Jinxmchue 14:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You edit on Dhulikhel Municipality

Hey, thanks for correcting the stub I put on Dhulikhel Municipality. I couldn't quite figure out the template. :) Sarc37 17:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Borat FAC

Responded.--The Negotiator 10:32, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Borat Picture

The new picture of Borat you place? It's nice! Alright! BaseballDetective 01:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Borat!

Two of them are still too large, but I don't like to continue to object over resolution when the images have been scaled down, because that's just nitpicky. I've withdrawn my objection, and I'll scale those two down a little more (from the original to minimize artifacts). By the way, Borat! was a double redirect for me. Would you mind fixing that and checking to see if there are any others? ShadowHalo 09:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that explains it. I figured that might have been the problem when the link at the top of the FAC was to a redirect. ShadowHalo 09:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Borat! Soundtrack

the line: "The folk music included in the movie has no connection to the authentic music of Kazakhstan" was removed. why?

1.its may be a useful hint especialy for the Borat fans who are not familiar with this kinds of folk music
2. I dont need to be ethnomusicologist to know that this music is not related to Kazakhstan in any possible way. Please check the Borat! track listing:

Thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chajeshukarie (talk • contribs) 15:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

L&M, what more "scientific evidences" do you need? The movie is not filmed in Kazakhstan (actualy its filmed in Romania); the music has absolutely no connection to Kazakh music (what Brega or Esma or Kocani Orkestar or Bijelo Dugme have to do with Kazakhstan?! They probably didnt have a clue where this country is until the movie came out); not a single word of Kazakh language is spoken in the movie instead they speak in Hebrew, Polish, Romanian, Armenian and what not, only not Kazakh); even Sacha doesn't look like a typical Kazakh men at all. The authors of this movie didnt bother with such geographical, ethnological or antropological details. its all one big joke.

Image reverted

I thought I did provide a source. It's http://www.bio.is/index.aspx?GroupId=38&TabId=42&NewsItemID=483&ModulesTabsId=35 bio.is --Steinninn 23:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Acopalypto

I'm sorry. You are a total retard. Paul Netto 05:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

My older brother has been vandalizing Epic Movie! Mewtwowimmer 05:51, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kent Hovind photo revert

I do not understand the reasons for changing the photo of Kent Hovind. Can you explain your reasons? Personally I think it is a better representation of him given current events and current age. Thanx. RiverBissonnette 19:19, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Borat on VHS

I did see an article somewhere that mentioned it, however, i am unable to locate it myself now. So until I find it again, i'll just leave it off. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Intersting (talk • contribs) 05:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Adolf Hitler

Re your refs to Hitler: A Study in Tyranny: Can you please add the date, publisher, and/or ISBN of the edition you're getting your page numbers from? It seems the book has gone through several editions, including an abridged one. --zenohockey 03:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bob the Goon

Hi,

If and only if we have a source that shows the character was in the movie, the redirect would be fine. Best wishes, Xoloz 16:19, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image

There's no option for the licence you wish to use because the licence isn't compatible with Wikipedia - it's Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 - Wikipedia cannot accept material that is declared to be "non-commercial use only". Whilst it may seem reasonable to restrict material that way, Wikipedia content is syndicated around the world on the internet and in print, frequently for commercial purposes. Non-commercial content is therefore useless to us. For that reason, such content is marked for speedy deletion automatically and deleted shortly after. For more information, you can visit this page. ⋐⋑ REDVEЯS 09:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Boratreg1scan.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Boratreg1scan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShadowHalo 20:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Plan 9 from Outer Space

No, I don't. I have Danny Peary's Cult Movies book which has a section on the film. I'll see if I can add something from it. (Ibaranoff24 20:23, 12 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Requesting unblocking from autoblock

checkY

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 66.230.200.151 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: —— Eagle101Need help? 22:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed —— Eagle101Need help? 22:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Informationclearinghouse.info

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Informationclearinghouse.info, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Informationclearinghouse.info is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Informationclearinghouse.info, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:52, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Young

Apu nominated the main Amanda Young picture for deletion. I've gave my thoughts and I'm going to notify others but if you could help I'd appreciate it. Thanks.--CyberGhostface 20:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Silent Hill Series

Sorry for the late reply, but first, I would like to thank you for your contributions in improving the SH2 article. I have completed the rest series so I can provide you with whatever information you would deem necessary in upgrading the article's quality. The best choice, in my opinion, is to gradually progress through the pages chronologically. It would obviously be best to go through the articles in which we already have sources available to make them better and not focus on those that haven't been released as of the moment, but I can understand if one wants to make Origins an exception since it is nearing release and, thus, may attract interest from fellow readers. May I suggest this as an acceptable list to follow by?

  • Main series, SH1, SH3, SH4, SH: Origins, Characters, Creatures

The Silent Hill movie article looks excellent and appears to be on par with other theatrical film pages, while I believe SH5, Arcade, and SH2 film have to wait before more details can be added to further their contents. I'll probably list possible changes on each individual talk page to prevent from being tedious with suggestions and cluster the discussion with text. Forgive the rambling, but give me your thoughts on this whenever you get the opportunity. Thanks for your time.

Hey, McCarthy. Its been a while since we last discussed the SH franchise, but I was wanting to ask for your opinion regarding whether the town itself should deserve its own seperate article to discuss the dark and mysterious history that has plagued the town and such? Get back to me with an answer when you get the chance.
Yes, I could possibly make the synopsis for the first installment much longer and more professional. My memory is rather rust on plot details, but I'll try and replay the title to refresh my mind. If you have an recommendations for additonal sources to prove some hidden details or plot elements, please let me know. Thanks.
Hey. I just wanted to say that I'm sorry for not getting around to typing a plot synopsis for the first installment yet. I'll probably have to force himself into sitting down and playing through the game sometime in the future when I get the opportunity. I will admit though that I'm currently in the process of redoing the List of Silent Hill monsters with proper references to explain the symbolism behind the creatures and I've been adding details to the info boxes in some of the articles.
Thanks for the IGN guides, Lenin. I thought those were only available in the paid subscription area, but I guess they've changed their policy recently. I attempted to add my revisions for the SH3 section, but everytime I do it cuts out the SH4 area completely and combines randomly with the Divine Creatures part. The links/references are completely fine though, so could it have something to do with image conflicts, my removal of the dead image links, or is there a text limit in some cases? If you can help me out here that will be great. Thanks again for the guides (since I really needed something for the The Room descriptions)!

I looked at the Silent Hill 2 article and everything seems expertly written and well arranged. The only thing that most are probably requesting is more citations (which in my opinion deteriorates the quality). However, I'll see what I can do based from the discussions on the 'Talk' page. I'm rather rusty at the moment so please bare with me. (Godzilla (talk) 01:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Verrieres Ridge

Thanks for removing the "poor ref". I actually reserved a meeting with the runners of the Calgary Highlanders Archives for this weekend, so I should be able to find the ref very soon.

Cam 20:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hitler

I only made 1 edit to it, that of adding a semi protect tmeplate to inform IP's or new accounts couldn't edit this article for now. As a result, I am going to re-add the template. Ellomate 04:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fine

write one thenTheManWhoLaughs 00:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Friend of Mankind

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article The Friend of Mankind, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Steve Dufour 13:39, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've included Template:Footer Works Adam Curtis and implemented it at the article on which you're working. Feel free to edit it as you see fit, and implement it in the articles for Curtis's other works, too. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 13:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the local/international split was just an example... though I'm not sure how it can actually be split. Perhaps overall criticism, then specific historical critiques? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Power of nightmares

Hello. I took a look at the article today which I worked on some time ago - I've basically retired from WP for the time being - and I believe the second paragraph which described the film in the lead was less accurate than the old paragraph. So I reinserted the old one. Feel free to consider or amend this at will. But I felt that the new paragraph just didn't correctly capture Curtis's thesis.

Regarding the GA failure, it was a bizarre travesty of a review that should be disregarded. To fail on such a clueless set of points is annoying and frustrating I know. What on earth was he thinking? I'd keep pushing forward and ask for more reviewers.-- Zleitzen(talk) 01:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Silent Hill AFD - a footnote

I've deleted the page, and many thanks.

I'm also using the deleted page as an example for a policy discussion, over at Wikipedia_talk:Deletion_process#Update_and_discussion_needed_on_merge_and_similar_closes for a few days. Feel free to comment if you have views :)

Many thanks! FT2 (Talk | email) 10:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant user name

One of my favorite so far on the encyclopedia. --Hemlock Martinis 09:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Adolf Hitler cph 3a48970.jpg

Ha you were right. It's been nominated for deletion already. howcheng {chat} 23:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bound (film) review

You commented some days ago that you would recheck the article on Bound (film) on its peer review. Would you mind doing so? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 16:37, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BenoitHouse

I don't think the image is replaceable (at the moment) because of all the tight security and that they would probably not want anyone to take photos at the moment. However, 3 or 4 months down the line, a photo may appear on a website like Flickr or something. I uploaded it mainly because I couldn't find any other photos of Benoit's house - I only found that one. Thanks for your concerns anyway. Davnel03 07:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Itchy & Scratchy & Marge

I have responded to your GA review of the article. -- Scorpion0422 18:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Silent Hill 2 (film)

I wasn't sure if it was appropriate, but wouldn't the wording for unreleased films at WP:NF, a guideline, take precedent over the merge discussion? I wasn't sure if it was proper to invoke that guideline, considering my stance of where it should go. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:23, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm not sure if they are. It's been a quiet discussion to merge so far. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:35, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Silent Hill 3

This site covers dialouge and memos throghout the games. i use it for a quick in game reference. Right before the mall shifts to the otherworld Heather meets Claudia for the first time and says "Claudia: Remember me, and your true self as well, also that which you must become. The one who will lead us to Paradise with blood stained hands." but no where yet does she mention birthing God. Its not until Heather comes home from the insurance building to see her murdered father, she runs up the stairs and her and Claudia says to her "Claudia: You will birth a God and build an eternal Paradise." Later Heather goes to Silent Hill to chase Claudia down for the murder of her father. She finally meets Claudia at the church, theres alot of dialoge here but I'll try to sum it up.. Claudia mentions that the world Alessa wanted is nearly here, Heather comments its not what she wants.. Claudia says "Not you, Your true self" refering to Alessa. Heather's tone changes and she begins to say "Oh but I am Alessa" and she starts saying things like she doesn't need another world.. Claudia comments" But you said it yourself. The world must first be cleansed with fire." Claudia after some dialouge reveals the plans of God: "Claudia: I wish only for the salvation of mankind.

Claudia: But for that to happen, the world must first be remade.

Claudia: And for that we need God."

Lastly in the conlusion w/ Heather & Claudia: "Claudia: Alessa, I’m saddened that you didn’t agree to this on your own.

Claudia: But I thank you for nurturing God with all the hate in your heart.


Claudia: It’s time for Mankind to be released from the shackles of sin that bind them.

[....]

Claudia: Why do you reject God’s mercy?

Claudia: Why do you cling to this corrupt world? You know that only God can save us.

Heather: And save you too? Happy ending?

Heather: I’d rather go to Hell.

Claudia: No, I don’t expect to be saved.

Claudia: That’s fine.

Claudia: Alessa, my dearest...

Claudia: For the pain I’ve caused you, I deserve no mercy.

Claudia: Even if it was to save mankind, it was too deep a sin.

Claudia: It was hubris for me to try to hasten the day of Her arrival.

[...]

Claudia: Just accept it, Alessa.

Claudia: The pain will dissapear.

Claudia: Oh, I’ve been waiting so long for this.

Claudia: Even as a child I saw the coming of this day.

Claudia: I knew that I would be a witness to it, Judgment Day"

As you can see there is much Christianity in Claudia's beliefs. She thinks that after Heather births God than the world will be cleansed by fire, all of humanity sins will be cleansed and ppl will be judged, but Claudia doesn't believe she will be saved. She kills Harry to fill Heather's heart w/ hatred to "nurture" God. God isn't mentioned as being 'rebirthed' per se, but it is as though it will be her "first" or "second" birth from the dogma. It also seems that before Alessa was burned in that ritual and admitted to the hospital that she wanted to give birth to God, as Claudia still believes Alessa does. But her feelings mustv'e changed during that 7 year time frame and Alessa probaly wasn't in contact w/ Claudia during that time. To further it the God Claudia births looks like Alessa before she was burned when she was 7, not the long haired Alessa from 1.

Maybe the events in one weren't considered totally "God"? I do know that Vincent mentions that Claudia was brainwashed by that "crazy, old hag" when refering to Dahlia as Heather/Alessa's mother. Anyways I hope this helps.

Xuchilbara 19:45, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Alessa

Thanks. We've had problems in the past w/ LM. Particurly the Valtiel page, which now that i think about it needs updating. I think its alright to have some editer who knows Japanese translate it, as long as they also have the original material in given language to compare and cite, but I know most SH editers just take from that fan source. I heard that the fan transaltion has mistakes, and I know for a fact that Another Crimson Tome is filled w/ translation mistakes & thats not a source that we want to make wikipedia look bad. 

Xuchilbara 17:54, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review on The Rocky Horror Picture Show

Why you son of a.....just kidding. Thanks for your review. I have posted a link on the talk page for others in case they have not noticed that a review was requested. If no one else makes these changes I probably will in the next week or so. Thanks again.--Amadscientist 23:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

T-Virus

Erm...what was the point in merging a large article with a stub and not putting the large files info in the stub? also you should have rather talked it over before moving T-Virus to Fictional Viruses in Resident Evil. OV Also... do you think there is more than 1 form of "T"? cos origonaly it took days before becomin zombies, first developing blisters, which become Buboes, which then pop and the flesh around them rott and fall off. in the other games, the don't feel anything and then get weaker + weaker and then have a fealing theyre gona be sick then transform (or if you're too injured to survive long enough for that: "die" (actualy stopping the heart and then take over the brain and then restart the heart)). -- OV

Your notability tag in a questionable newly created article was deleted

My spamming sense is tingling. It seems User:Genepooldesign was created just to spam for her (assuming) "publication", North Texas Journal. I notice that after her only edits were made to spam its website and article. In addition, the person removed the notability tag you placed on the North Texas Journal. I re-input the notability tag because I don't think it is either. (notable, of course) --Souphanousinphone 22:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Power of Nightmares

That's a good idea. Yeah, I saw where you'd said that somewhere else after I'd made the comment. I'll look around a bit too. Doctor Sunshine talk 21:06, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

Hi. You don't seem to be an administrator, but I can't work out why. Can I nominate you? --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 16:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. I don't feel quite ready for that sort of job. Maybe in a year or two but now now. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 16:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 16:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


SH 2 char.

Defenately. I've seen bunches of anime character lists, & if its a big enough series it includes another article on minor characters. (Not that SH2 has those) I think there are snippets of small info that could be added. Like Laura's VA (Which Idk anyway lol) & I do believe James's job was as a clerk. The references are really good, great work! Xuchilbara 20:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Yeah I think I can pitch in & i would love to. LM doesn't ofer too much on Maria but theres slight in game evidence to her supernatural origins. Xuchilbara 03:11, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I added to the Maria and PH sections. I tried to go in depth explanation about the Ph's origins and reason for existence. As for Maria i added a bunch of Born from a wich senerio stuff. (I saw you mentioned Ernest but not Maria really) I think the references to it needs tidying up, but I don't feel like doing it right now, I might fix those later tho. Xuchilbara 04:50, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cranmer

Thomas Cranmer has picked up its first supports for FAC. Would please check on it again and offer any more suggestions. Thank you for your help. -- SECisek 08:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Velvet

Hi. I was wondering in getting the article Blue Velvet (film) to a featured status. I was wondering if you could take a look or contribute as it would be appreciated and since you have helped with two other FA articles. CandyMountainLover 07:19, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Titanic images

Hi. I read your reply on the Titanic Images (Titanic DVD releases) and I mainly disagree with what you said. I would, however, not mind if Image:Titanicde.jpg is removed from the page, and Image:Titanicse.jpg replaces it. I couldn't find a good image for the 4-disc set anyway, so I guess this could do for both. If you want me to remove the cover for the 5-Disc set, I'll do so. Please see the page again and tell me if you like it. Limetolime 18:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Jigsaw

Right now, I'm mightly backed up. I'm peer reviewing Bianca Montgomery and Maggie Stone, while at the same time trying to turn Smallville (season 2), and Smallville (season 3) into pages that resemble my work on season 1. I'm also rewriting the Michael Myers page in my sandbox, and dealing with a FAR for the featured article Andrew Van De Kamp. I'll try and look over the page some, but my best advice is to study the Jason article, structure wise. I see that for the most part it is there already. I can tell you that the two images in the appearance section won't hold up, because they're simply eye candy. We know what he looks like in the films. Isn't there a comic book or other literature on him? I could have sworn there was some prequel information in another medium. I'd try and look for that type of stuff. I would look at Wikipedia:Citation templates, because some of the references are just web links. The "Bell on Jigsaw" stuff seems to be all about characterization, so it should be there. I'd try and look for web sources on how they cast Bell and whatnot. If I can, I'll see if the DVDs I own have anything about the creation of Jigsaw, or anything else that is useful for the article. I might just write everything down, this way the film articles can benefit from them as well. I don't know when that will be, because, as I said, I'm kind of backed up right now with a lot of other projects.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 19:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have encountered my friend

any comments or advice would be welcome! --Fredrick day 22:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saw Wikiproject?

User:Famguy3 suggested to me that we start a Saw Wikiproject. I was wondering if you have any ideas for starting or setting it up.--CyberGhostface 15:17, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I started one up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Saw.--CyberGhostface 21:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saw traps page is up for deletion

The List of traps in the Saw film series page has been nominated for deletion, and it would be great if you contributed to the discussion. Jack Of Hearts | Miss A Turn 00:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
For you work with Borat, I, Sharkface217, hereby award you this barnstar. Keep up the good work! --Sharkface217 09:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


You're quite welcome. Sharkface217 03:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough in-line citations

Perhaps you might like to comment on my stance over here? --Joopercoopers 15:36, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Saw September 2007 Newsletter


The WikiProject Saw Newsletter
Issue I - September 2007
Member news
  • The project has currently 13 members.
From the Members

Welcome to the first issue of the WikiProject Saw's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask. CyberGhostface 17:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pages Needing Cleanup
Current Debates
Monthly Collaboration
Newsletter Challange
  • Try to make the character articles more encyclopedic by making them less in-universe. See Jigsaw and Amanda's articles for guidance. Also see Jason Voorhees, which is a featured article. (Obviously there is more information on Jason available than the Saw characters, but it is worth looking at to see what's considered the best of the best.)
  • With Saw IV coming out, there is bound to be a lot of vandalism and speculations. Please keep an eye on the articles.
  • Try to invite more members to this project. If you know any Saw fans who are good with computers, invite them to Wikipedia. The more the merrier.

CyberGhostface 17:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Silent Hill 2

Hey, sorry for the late reply. Regarding the OR tag on the SH2 article, I haven't viewed the article in a while, it's probable the problems don't exist any more; remove the OR tag at your discretion (if you haven't already). Parjay ► Talk 14:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey i was told to complain here so I was just wondering man just why do you like dicks so much i mean i like dick cheney and dick armey but you like all the dicks so i was just wondering how you handle that many dicks in your life —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trover (talk • contribs) 21:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:V for Vendetta

Template:V for Vendetta has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Maccy69 18:13, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Saw September October Newsletter


The WikiProject Saw Newsletter
Issue II - October 2007
Member news
  • The project has currently 19 members.
From the Members

Welcome to the second issue of the WikiProject Saw's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

It's now "Saw Weekend" and Saw IV has been out for a couple of days now. (If you haven't seen it, don't worry, I won't spoil anything for you.) Because of this, a lot of the articles are probably going to need a bit of work. I'll go into more detail on other various sections. All in all, a lot of the 'challenges' from last month's newsletter are still here. Since the release of IV will probably be the last major release of info at least until next year's V we could probably just try to improve the information we already have.

We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask. CyberGhostface 18:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pages Needing Cleanup
  • List of traps in the Saw film series: This survived deletion, but it was recommended that we change the article a bit.
  • Detective Eric Matthews: This article could use a bit of clean-up to make it less in-universe. Since he's one of the few recurring characters outside of Jigsaw and Amanda, we could probably base it off off their formats.
Current Debates
Monthly Collaboration
  • Last month's monthly collaboration was Saw (film). As a guide, look at other featured horror film articles such as Halloween (1978 film) and Night of the Living Dead. More external information (such as behind the scenes, reception, etc) should be added if possible. A new one hasn't been decided yet. My suggestion would be to either work some more on Saw's article, or perhaps start a new collaboration.
Newsletter Challange
  • Try to make the character articles more encyclopedic by making them less in-universe. See Jigsaw and Amanda's articles for guidance. Also see Jason Voorhees, which is a featured article. (Obviously there is more information on Jason available than the Saw characters, but it is worth looking at to see what's considered the best of the best.)
  • Some of the plot articles seem to be overtly long. Without bowdlerizing them, maybe we could try to make them a bit shorter and concise.
  • Try to invite more members to this project. If you know any Saw fans who are good with computers, invite them to Wikipedia. The more the merrier.

--CyberGhostface 18:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SH4

I don't think it counts as "significant contributions" but I think I'll step aside and let a fresh pair of eyes review it. hbdragon88 22:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kerry in the Saw Template

At the Saw series template another user thinks that Kerry should be on the template (and probably get her own article, although he/she hasn't specified that yet) because she's been in all the movies thus far. I'm disagreeing, as I think it should only be for the major protagonists and antagonists. If you have an opinion for this, that would be great.--CyberGhostface 18:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

I left some comments on Talk:Silent Hill 4: The Room and would greatly appreciate your response so that I can address your concerns. Thank you. Macy's123 11:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response

By the way, I must say that you've got the best username I've ever seen. Seriously, my brother found it hilarious after I explained the history to him. Anyway, I'm tied up right now, but I'll issue a full critique of the article later, probably some time this weekend. Thanks. Ashnard Talk Contribs 17:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Zombie Nightmare

That's a pretty shoddy-looking link... I think that in the scheme of the Internet being a dynamic medium, it's OK, but I doubt that it'd survive a FAC process. A better source could be used, though. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 02:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'd say that it would be OK. Just be on the lookout for other resources; perhaps you can phase out that resource as you go along. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 02:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Merry Christmas!

CyberGhostface (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Don't overdo it on the fudge!

Spread the Holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaminglawyer/MerryChristmas!}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Wurm Online

You said it had no sources, but it would have been easier if you'd have labeled exactly what needs sourcing. Thanks Mollsmolyneux (talk) 21:47, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wtf is going on with you over at Manos page?

Wtf is that reverting my edits every three minutes? Reply to my points in talk and THEN maybe re-edit. Jesus... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.132.224.196 (talk) 00:50, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during December 31 2007 (UTC)

Warning
Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at "Manos" The Hands of Fate. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. John254 00:54, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you part of the Aspergers group too? It's my edits that are being repeatedly reverted. I am the one who edited in the first place and user levin reverted it back twice. And I am the one who even bothered mentioning at length why I edited. 91.132.224.196 (talk) 01:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black Sox scandal

You failed to indicate which version you restored from, and you clobbered some citations, so I took your actions to be vandalism. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 05:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was from November 18th. I restored the deleted parts into the current article, leaving the rest of the current article intact. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 06:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Saw January Newsletter


The WikiProject Saw Newsletter
Issue III - January 2008

Happy New Year, everyone!

Not much of a newsletter for today...I just wanted to report that OfficialSaw.com's website has undergone a massive renovation and has added character profiles and trap descriptions and the like. Why am I telling you this? Because it appears that our Wikipedia articles have been used for the site! (Check out the House of Jigsaw history section for one example). So feel proud, knowing that the articles that you have worked on have garnered notice from the folks at LionsGate...

--CyberGhostface (talk) 16:16, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Gerrard.

There are some references on the Lisa Gerrard page. Why is the nomination being opposed?

Glitter1959 (talk) 04:24, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Glitter1959[reply]


How many references does the page need?

Glitter1959 (talk) 00:14, 19 January 2008 (UTC)Glitter1959[reply]

Re: FAC

Oh man, do I feel dumb. I modified the support to reflect the reality of the article. I can't believe I did that....Wow. Again, great article, and I'm sorry about the mistake. Thingg⊕⊗ 04:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Define "negative"

Same questions I asked here.

At what point does a percentage become "negative?" 70%? 60? 50? The old American 100% = "A" and 60% = "F"? And what makes your POV definition of "negative" the norm? Why not leave it as "mixed" and let the reader decide how to judge the reviews instead of you pushing your POV on them? 67.135.49.211 (talk) 04:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Love your user name.

What a perfect 1950's evil vs evil juxtaposition. How perfect! OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 07:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lenin_and_McCarthy/archive1&oldid=1147967258"