Jump to content

User talk:ZLEA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user helped get "Basketball Hall of Fame commemorative coins" listed at Did You Know on the main page on August 29, 2019.
This user helped get "Continental Currency dollar coin" listed at Did You Know on the main page on August 14, 2019.
This user helped get "General Dynamics–Boeing AFTI/F-111A Aardvark" listed at Did You Know on the main page on July 24, 2020.
This user helped get "Republic XP-69" listed at Did You Know on the main page on July 24, 2020.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 919181512a (talk | contribs) at 00:20, 8 February 2023. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

 Main Talk Awards To Do Sandbox Resources Bird Watching 



>

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

Administrators' newsletter – September 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).

Guideline and policy news

  • A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
  • An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
  • The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.

Miscellaneous

  • The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
  • Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.

Tech News: 2022-36

23:20, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Junkers Ju 187

See 187 Strassenbande. There's often a reason for this sort of vandalism, if one is curious enough to find out! (Blame my OCD-like real tendencies.) BilCat (talk) 22:09, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-37

01:48, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to get WikiProject Amateur Radio back on the air!

Hi, I'm Dr vulpes (💬📝) and I'm currently doing my best to resurrect the amateur radio WikiProject. A lot of the articles need some serious work and so I'm trying to organize an article improvement drive in October. If you're interested check out the link to the drive and the project page. Right now everything is in the planning stages, trying to find people interested, articles to focus on, etc. So if you know anyone who would like to help out feel free to invite them! If you no longer interested in this project that's a-ok just remove yourself from the list on the project page and I'll never badger you again. 73! Dr vulpes (💬📝) 00:13, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-38

MediaWiki message delivery 22:14, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, September 2022

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-39

MediaWiki message delivery 00:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

Administrators' newsletter – October 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


TheWikiWizard- September 2022

Hey, ZLEA! Here is the September 2022 Issue for the TheWikiWizard in October! We apologize for the delay.

Humor

  • It's time for Christmas, summer is coming to an end
  • What are you giving Santa for Chirstmas? (He told me to for you to leave more cookies and the Halloween Candy)
  • Halloween, give out money instead :P

Wiki(p/m)edia News

  • A discussion in regards to the new vector skin on EN Wikipedia had taken place, you can find it here
  • The Foundation Elections occurred learn more here
  • Quite a few successful RFA's took place, some include Z1720, and Dan Cherek! Congrats to all the successful RFA's!

Editor's Notes

  • Thanks for your patience as we are late with issues, you can join us if you want to help out!
  • Please note that sometimes the system may deliver this twice to you, but I only send it once
Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.

See you in the next issue! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 00:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-40

MediaWiki message delivery 00:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-41

14:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, October 2022

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-42

MediaWiki message delivery 21:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-43

MediaWiki message delivery 21:21, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

Tech News: 2022-44

MediaWiki message delivery 21:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2022-45

MediaWiki message delivery 00:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the name of Chengdu Wing Loong-10

Wing Loong is name for export given by the manufacturer Chengdu while WZ-10 is a newly released formal designation by Chinese People's Liberation Army. Using Chinese military designation prioritizing over manufacturer export name is a convention on Wikipedia for Chinese military aircraft articles. For example Chengdu J-10, J-10 is the formal designation while FC-10 is the export name. Same as Xi'an JH-7 and its export name FBC-1, Chengdu J-7 and its export name F-7. Or the article can be redirected to "Chengdu WZ-10 / Wing Loong-10" as compromise. Infinty 0 (talk) 00:25, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infinty 0 WP:AIR/NC states that "If the type has multiple names then either use the most common or none if this would cause confusion." Both "Chengdu WZ-10" and "Chengdu Wing Loong-10" are acceptable titles for the article, but we have to choose one or the other. Titles with multiple aircraft names are generally used for aircraft families, such as Gulfstream G650/G700/G800, not single types with differing export designations. - ZLEA T\C 00:30, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCIX, November 2022

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:33, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shahed Saegheh

There is just no source for what i changed, the drone has never been advertised as possessing stealth technology and doesn't possess it

Israeli propaganda used this when they shot down one using their F-35, making advertisement for it by telling "we shot down a stealth UAV" when it is not the case

It just doesn't require a source, this is how it was advertised, without mentioning any stealth capability, meanwhile a lot of people thinks it is stealth because it resembles to the Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel which was advertised as possessing stealth, Saegeh wasn't advertised possessing it

The edit was to make clear to people looking into it that it is not a stealth UCAV, so no one could use this to make propaganda

If it was used during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and shot down by Ukrainian forces, i am 100% sure they would have claimed they shot down "a stealth UAV" and trashtalking Iran, when it is not at all a stealth UCAV, and not advertised as such 2A01:CB04:133:8000:6A1F:E744:AB67:3B72 (talk) 18:12, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid a absence of sources is not good enough. Unless there is a reliable source which specifically states that it has never been advertised as a "stealth UAV", we cannot make the statement in the article. What is known is that numerous western observers have labeled the aircraft as a "stealth UAV", and to my knowledge Iran has made no attempt to refute these claims. I suggest you read WP:VNT. - ZLEA T\C 18:27, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What is deranging is that there is not even a single Iranian source on the article beside western medias or persian language affiliated and "analysis" from Saudi/Israeli funded think tanks, more deranging is that it contains sources from The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, reading the first line of the wikipedia article of this think tank will make you understand what it is, you just can't make a neutral article using those organizations and think tanks for something about Iran, it is like putting a Russian think tank or analysis of an Ukrainian weapon and using it to make claims, or using an Indian outlet for claims concerning Pakistan
[36] There is an Iranian source with the pictures of the advertised drone, there is no mention of stealth, neither on Shahed 171
In almost every Iranian made weapons article, there is barely mentions of Iranian sources, but western analysis, this Iranian sources does not mention stealth, western sources thinking it is stealth isn't a valable source for making a claim that it possess stealth technology 2A01:CB04:133:8000:6A1F:E744:AB67:3B72 (talk) 18:40, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Again, the fact that Iranian sources don't mention stealth technology isn't enough. If there is an Iranian source which refutes the west's claims of stealth technology, then we can change the article. It's not a problem Wikipedia can fix.
On a side note, the article doesn't claim the aircraft is a stealth UAV in the first place. The only appearances of the word "stealth" are in the source titles. - ZLEA T\C 18:46, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
At least remove the Washington Institute sources 2A01:CB04:133:8000:6A1F:E744:AB67:3B72 (talk) 19:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't believe a source to be reliable, feel free to bring it up at WP:RS/N. - ZLEA T\C 19:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-46

MediaWiki message delivery 21:53, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:B-17 family

Hi, I have a couple quick questions on Template:B-17 family

  • The groupings for Bombers and Transports have linefeeds in them, rather than spanning a single line–is that intentional or ? Just checking.
  • I was thinking to sub-divide the Notable aircraft entries into Extant and Non-extant (or similar wording)–does that seem OK, or any concern?

Thanks. Dmoore5556 (talk) 23:27, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dmoore5556 The linefeeds in the "Bombers" and "Transports" were intentional. Both are split into the two different designation schemes used ("Bombers" is split into Air Force and Navy designations, "Transports" is split into "modified Bomber (B)" and "Cargo (C)" designations). As for "Notable aircraft", I think it would be a good idea to split the section. - ZLEA T\C 23:39, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification on formatting, and for sub-dividing that section in the Template. Dmoore5556 (talk) 23:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

44-6393 Starduster

Hi, the lead to List of surviving Boeing B-17 Flying Fortresses notes that only six surviving planes saw combat. Five of those planes currently have Wikipedia articles; the one that doesn't is 44-6393 Starduster. I was thinking to create an article about that plane, as I believe its provenance makes it notable. I wanted to get your input as to if doing so seems worthwhile? Dmoore5556 (talk) 03:34, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dmoore5556 If you can find enough reliable sources, by all means go for it. I'm not familiar with that aircraft's history, so I doubt I would be able to help much. - ZLEA T\C 03:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'll work on it as time permits. Multiple sources indicate it was the command aircraft of Lt Gen Ira C. Eaker, commander of the Eighth Air Force, which adds to its notability. Dmoore5556 (talk) 03:54, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-47

MediaWiki message delivery 23:20, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SH-3 Sea King/S-61 family

Hi Z, I'm thinking about creating a navbox for the Sikorsky SH-3 Sea King/S-61 family, but wanted to make sure you don't already have one sandboxed somewhere first. If not, I could work one up in a day or so. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 05:33, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BilCat I had considered making one, but I never got around to doing so. You can go ahead and do it. - ZLEA T\C 05:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. BilCat (talk) 06:53, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've got it started at Draft:Template:Sikorsky S-61 family, and will move it to Template:Sikorsky S-61 family when its done, if you want to go ahed and watch the page. I added a hidden field for "Accidents" where you have it in the S-70 box, but I'm not planning on adding those right now.
I also added a "Names" field, as I believe those are useful. I wasn't sure if you omitted that on purpose in some of your other boxes, but some readers only know aircraft by their names, or they have no designations, especially British aircraft, such as the Commando variant of the Westland Sea King. BilCat (talk) 00:06, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done BilCat (talk) 01:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I'm not against a "Names" section, but I sometimes forget to put one in. - ZLEA T\C 03:01, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
BilCat Is the Sikorsky HH-52 Seaguard a member of the S-61 family? There are links in the "See also" section indicating that the aircraft are related, but there is no mention in the article of commonality between the two types other than similar layout and engine (which doesn't necessarily imply relation). - ZLEA T\C 03:09, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, it seemed as close a connection as with the S-55, so I went with it. BilCat (talk) 03:13, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

Tech News: 2022-48

MediaWiki message delivery 20:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).

CheckUser changes

removed TheresNoTime

Oversight changes

removed TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2022-49

MediaWiki message delivery 00:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CC, December 2022

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikiWizard - December 2022

Hey, ZLEA! Here is the December 2022 issue for the TheWikiWizard! We've been dormant for a few months!

Humor

  • How many times will you write 2022 in 2023??
  • Don't write Christmas Cards/do gift shopping in December, do it in the summer!

Wiki(p/m)edia News

Not much to report this issue, but we do have these to report!

  • Quite a few RFAs took place since the last issue of this newsletter. You can view more here!
  • The Voting for a sound logo is taking place on Wikimedia Commons, head over to that link to find out more!
  • The Arbitration Committee Elections is happening on the English Wikipedia. (The elections may have finished by the time you see this message, please check the page for the date and time of the election deadline)

Editor's Notes

  • Have a great holiday and new years! We'll see you in 2023.


Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.

See you next time. Happy Holidays! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 02:43, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This issue was delivered to you with MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on 02:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-50

MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-51

MediaWiki message delivery 23:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RE: article "Shahed_129"

Hi please refer to this article by a reputable source on "martyr" vs "witness" translation of the word "Shahed" in this precise context. If you disagree, I am happy to discuss with you. https://english.elpais.com/international/2022-10-12/iranian-suicide-drones-russias-new-favorite-weapon-in-ukraine-war.html2607:FEA8:1F9F:A00:DE5:CAFD:B9A6:BD68 (talk) 23:02, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

Happy Sixth First Edit Day!

Hey, ZLEA. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Chris Troutman (talk) 19:39, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
  • Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.

The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-02

MediaWiki message delivery 01:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why

Special:Contributions/90.254.56.9

is this you?, how about leaving me alone.and get this account off my talk pageJackson883941 (talk) 01:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson883941 That's not me. A CheckUser can confirm. - ZLEA T\C 01:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Very odd. BilCat (talk) 04:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As Heironymous Rowe seems to have implied, I wouldn't be surprised if the IP was Jackson883941. There are a few minor differences in comment style, such as the fact that the IP usually capitolized the first letter in a sentence while Jackson883941 did not. However, it's probably not a coincidence that the IP harassed Jackson883941 in addition to three admins. The IP's choice of admins to harass puzzles me as well. Heironymous Rowe was involved in this discussion started by Jackson883941, and 331dot participated in several other discussions on the same page and also had blocked the IP in December. As for Sdrqaz, I do not see any connection. - ZLEA T\C 05:15, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm surprised Jackson hasn't been indeffed before. They've been extremely uncivil in the past, not just recently in our interactions with him. As to the IP, hopefully someone will run a checkuser on them. BilCat (talk) 05:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As the comments on Sdrqaz's page, I guess we'll see what happens in 18 days. Someone's block will probably end, and be reinstated shortly thereafter! BilCat (talk) 05:30, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I just discovered this IP which made very similar edits to User talk:69.127.80.35 as 90.254.56.9. I've added all three IPs to my watchlist, as something tells me it isn't over. - ZLEA T\C 06:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Veddy intwesting! See also this edit and following. BilCat (talk) 07:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And this too. That was a particularly nasty user. Seems Jackson been socking for a while now. BilCat (talk) 21:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And this one too. And I've had bad interactions with both of them. Makes me wonder if there's another connection somewhere to another sock farm. BilCat (talk) 21:16, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

Tech News: 2023-03

MediaWiki message delivery 01:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-04

MediaWiki message delivery 23:44, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

T-54

Thanks for finding and adding that. I wonder what they'll name it. Goshawk? Maybe Stratoliner? BilCat (talk) 06:13, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The T-44 was named "Pegasus", so perhaps something mythological and/or Greek. - ZLEA T\C 16:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the T-44 is named "Pegasus", as mentioned in the Navy press release, but that didn't stop the Air Force from "stealing" the name for the Boeing KC-46 Pegasus. The convention up until then was to only have one name at a time for aircraft in service. My suggestion was a snide/sarcastic way of saying that the T-54 should "steal" a name from an in-service Boeing product. ("Stratoliner" would be an absolutely ridiculous name for multi-engine trainer!) Anyway, since aircraft names are approved by the Air Force Department, I doubt something like that would happen. The Navy might ought to request "Pegasus II", since both the T-44 and T-54 are King Airs, but I still doubt the AF would approve it either. So we'll see. They might go for a bird name, as with the TH-73 Thrasher. We'll find out eventually. BilCat (talk) 19:58, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Canada Goose"! - Ahunt (talk) 22:58, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-05

MediaWiki message delivery 00:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
  • Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

Tech News: 2023-06

MediaWiki message delivery 10:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AMCA Propaganda

The above source you mentioned isn't readable & not free. it's a Paid book not a article. cannot be used as source Mailmax2018 (talk) 19:04, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

your beloved User talk:Hello642s vandalized page about Turkish Earth Mailmax2018 (talk) 19:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mailmax2018 Please read WP:SOURCEACCESS. Non-free and offline sources are indeed usable on Wikipedia. Just because you don't want to spend money to buy it doesn't mean it can't be used. Also, there is no excuse for making personal attacks. Even if a user has vandalized an article, you shouldn't call them "an idiot". - ZLEA T\C 20:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 202, February 2023

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

About that revert of my edit of HAL Tejas Mk2 i believe the revert to be wrong since the max speed is at altitude unless sea level is specified. There is no source specifying max speed at sea level. This aircraft hasn't had it's first flight yet so i don't expect anyone to find a reliable source that specifies that the claimed max speed is at sea level. Not everyone editing wikipedia understands Mach conversion and how it relates to altitude so i think it's just a bad conversion behind the current value 919181512a (talk) 00:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]