Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konover Construction
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 10:21, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 10:21, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. --Fang Aili 說嗎? 23:02, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
PROD tag removed by creator User:Konover with no explanation. Article seems to be promotional in nature about a company that doesn't seem to meet WP:CORP. W.marsh 20:35, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There are several construction companies with Konover as a name (Google test), it seems this might be vanity or misleading; either way, I agree with nom Hobbeslover 02:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If this company meets WP:CORP, it may be due more to criticism of labor practices and a lawsuit over a workplace injury (actually this incident has received a fair amount of coverage). What's interesting about this article is that half of it is about a labor activist who is critical of the company's practices. If it's intended to be promotional, I doubt the company would include this information, and certainly not a link to the Web site of the critic [1]. In any case, none of this has a bearing on the company being notable. It just seems odd to the paranoid amongst me. ScottW 03:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Vanity or not, it doesn't seem to meet WP:CORP.ScottW 12:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete advert. Stifle (talk) 00:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.