Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Book (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfy. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Book (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is premature. The film is in production (though it's not clear in which state exactly) and there are simply no references discussing it. Also note that the username of the creator suggests a possible conflict of interest. Finally, it's not clear if the film's title is "The Book" or "The Black Book". Pichpich (talk) 16:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question... I literally started working on this 5 to 6 minutes before you flagged it. The Film title is the Black Book, however there is a redirect for that to an earlier film and as I am new and not sure how to put that change up, modified things so I can still move forward. As for the premature nature of the article, we are already filming and are close to finishing. I have seen several other films in progress on here. I didn't realize, with the amount of Personal bio pages on here that it would be a conflict of interest. Topherchambers (talk) 16:13, 23 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Topherjchambers (talk • contribs) [reply]

Userfy if User:Topherjchambers wants to save the content in his userspace. The film is not yet established as notable under WP:NFF, but maybe it will be notable when it is released. If the film is actually going to be titled The Black Book rather than just The Book, the proper title for the article would be The Black Book (2017 film) per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films). But that would only apply if the film is notable enough to warrant an article at all. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy, with the caveat that even when this film is complete it may not meet Notability guidelines for films or General notability guidelines. The creator is reminded that Wikipedia is not for promotion, self- or otherwise, and subjects only warrant encyclopedia articles when they have already received significant third-party attention. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:30, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.