User talk:TTTAssasinator

Recent edit to Born to Kill (gang)

Unsourced content added. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. However the content you added did not have a source. All content on Wikipedia must be verifiable Thank you! MrBill3 (talk) 13:25, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, TTTAssasinator! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! MrBill3 (talk) 00:29, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Clarity in referring to a reference

Greetings and thank you for your contributions.

When referring to a reference in your edit summary using the citation number is potentially problematic as the citation numbering changes as refs are added or removed. To provide a better frame of reference I suggest using the author's last name and the year. For your recent edit to Born to Kill (gang) that would be "English 1995".

Some articles and/or content are more likely to be contested than others. For any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged adding inline citations is a good idea. It is a mixed bag here on WP with some articles having a citation (or multiple) for each sentence, some having them more or less at the end of each paragraph and some poorly or vaguely sourced. I think having a citation on each sentence can clutter an article unnecessarily so I am not suggesting you add a cite to every sentence.

Best. - - MrBill3 (talk) 11:09, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BTKBannerParade.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BTKBannerParade.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VinhVuFuneral.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VinhVuFuneral.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charles Sobhraj in 1995.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charles Sobhraj in 1995.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Đại Cathay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Triad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Năm Cam

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://factsanddetails.com/southeast-asia/Vietnam/sub5_9f/entry-3449.html. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:43, 9 April 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, TTTAssasinator. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

DYK nomination of Song-Lý War

Hello! Your submission of Song-Lý War at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! HaEr48 (talk) 07:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@HaEr48: Hello, I have addressed the citation in the section "Aftermath" of the article. This is in regards to the DYK Nomination of the Song-Lý War article recorded on April 22. Thanks in response. TTTAssasinator (talk) 21:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Song-Lý War

On 29 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Song-Lý War, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the borders negotiated after the Song-Lý War largely remain as the current boundaries between China and Vietnam? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Song-Lý War. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Song-Lý War), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help verify translations of articles from vi

Hello TTTAssasinator,

Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from vi to English Wikipedia?

File:Language icon.svg

This would involve evaluating a translated article on the English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original vi article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:

There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages including vi, using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown, including some articles translated from vi. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.

If you can help out, that would be great. Here's a sample of the articles that need checking:

Nguyen_Anh_9 ✓ Pass
Trần_Độ ✓ Pass
Phuong Dung ✓ Pass
The Dance Of Death

All you have to do, is compare the English article to the vi article, and assess them "Pass" or "Fail" (the {{Pass}} and {{Fail}} templates may be useful here). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then assessing it, that's even better, but it isn't required.) Also please note that we are assessing accuracy not completeness, so if the English article is much shorter that is okay, as long as whatever has been translated so far is factually accurate.

If you can help, please {{ping}} me here to let me know. You can add your pass/fails above, right next to each link, or you may indicate your results below. Thanks! Elinruby (talk) 04:41, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Elinruby: I have evaluated the articles and compared them to the articles in the Vietnamese wiki. The article Nguyen Anh 9 is a faithful translation of the original Vietnamese article and is almost word per word, so it checks out. The Trần Độ article also was faithful in regards to the original article, although it was much shorter, and the Phuong Dung article was also accurate in terms of information to the original article. As for The Dance of Death, I could not find the equivalent Vietnamese article, so I am unable to evaluate it at this moment. Hope this helps.TTTAssasinator (talk) 02:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TTTAssasinator: that is really helpful, thank you! I am going to update the last with these. Elinruby (talk) 10:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TTTAssasinator: - according to the history it is translated from here, but that looks like it's an error message (?) I know that is a clueless question but that is why I am asking for help ;) Elinruby (talk) 10:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ethnic groups in Vietnam

Hi, I have seen that you are active in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Vietnam. I have just edited this template. Please read Template talk:Ethnic groups in Vietnam#No Thai people in Vietnam. May be you can check if my edit is correct, thank you -Carlo58s (talk) 05:08, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TTTAssasinator. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TTTAssasinator. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Translation help?

I found you from the list of translators, so I hope you can help me. I am working on Draft:Longan witches broom-associated virus and I have used google translate to get me most of the way, but it seems that the Vietnamese terms for the disease do not use the word 'witch'. The terms I found are chổi rồng trên nhãn,^[1] chổi rồng hại nhãn, bệnh chùn ngọn, bệnh chổi sể, and bệnh hủi nhãn.^[2] Google lends me to believe that these terms refer to dragons and not witches, which seems plausible given the idiom 'witches broom' doesn't necessarily mean anything in Vietnam. I am hoping you can provide a good literal translation, and hopefully I can use it as a DYK hook for halloween or something. Let me know if I'm close or not. Thanks! --Nessie (talk) 02:57, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Viện Cây ăn Quả Miền Nam. "HỘI CHỨNG CHỔI RỒNG TRÊN NHÃN VÀ BIỆN PHÁP QUẢN LÝ" (ppt). Integrated Pest Management Innovation Lab (in Vietnamese). Retrieved 12 September 2019.
^ "Chổi rồng hại nhãn" (html). Cấm nang Cây Trồng (in Vietnamese). Retrieved 12 September 2019.

[1] Viện Cây ăn Quả Miền Nam. "HỘI CHỨNG CHỔI RỒNG TRÊN NHÃN VÀ BIỆN PHÁP QUẢN LÝ" (ppt). Integrated Pest Management Innovation Lab (in Vietnamese). Retrieved 12 September 2019.

[2] "Chổi rồng hại nhãn" (html). Cấm nang Cây Trồng (in Vietnamese). Retrieved 12 September 2019.

[1]

[2]