User talk:212.178.233.111: Difference between revisions
→Use talk page: new section |
Warning: Three-revert rule on List of Serbian flags. |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
First of all, welcome to Wikipedia! I assume good faith in the last days, but decisions on Wikipedia are made by consensus ([[WP:CONS]]), primarily through disscussion on talk-page ([[WP:TPG]]), treating each other with consideration and respect ([[WP:CIVIL]]). If you need help, please do not hesitate to contact me. --[[User:WEBDuB|WEBDuB]] ([[User talk:WEBDuB|talk]]) 19:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC) |
First of all, welcome to Wikipedia! I assume good faith in the last days, but decisions on Wikipedia are made by consensus ([[WP:CONS]]), primarily through disscussion on talk-page ([[WP:TPG]]), treating each other with consideration and respect ([[WP:CIVIL]]). If you need help, please do not hesitate to contact me. --[[User:WEBDuB|WEBDuB]] ([[User talk:WEBDuB|talk]]) 19:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
== September 2020 == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:List of Serbian flags]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|the bold, revert, discuss cycle]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''Edit warring is not going to help you -- discussing on the article's talk page will. Please use the talk page to gain consensus for your revision (clearly- your revision does not have consensus if so many editors are undoing your edits).''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> —[[User:MelbourneStar|<b style="color:#E22">Mel</b><b style="color:#F20">bourne</b><b style="color:#F73">Star</b>]]<span style="color: #FF9F00;">☆</span>[[User talk:MelbourneStar|<sup style="color:#407">'''''talk'''''</sup>]] 10:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:40, 16 September 2020
September 2020
Your recent editing history at Flag of Serbia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —MelbourneStar☆talk 10:38, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Same goes for you. Stop deleting content of article while discussion is still ongoing.
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:212.178.233.111 reported by User:MelbourneStar (Result: ). Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆talk 10:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Use talk page
First of all, welcome to Wikipedia! I assume good faith in the last days, but decisions on Wikipedia are made by consensus (WP:CONS), primarily through disscussion on talk-page (WP:TPG), treating each other with consideration and respect (WP:CIVIL). If you need help, please do not hesitate to contact me. --WEBDuB (talk) 19:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
September 2020
Your recent editing history at List of Serbian flags shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Edit warring is not going to help you -- discussing on the article's talk page will. Please use the talk page to gain consensus for your revision (clearly- your revision does not have consensus if so many editors are undoing your edits). —MelbourneStar☆talk 10:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)