User talk:Deciduous Maple: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:06, 9 March 2017

Welcome!

Hello, Deciduous Maple! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 21:58, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

December 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Black supremacy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

while I agree it does not belong in the first sentence,mconsensus on the talk page, and other talk pages dealing with supremecy, was to include it. Please start a new discussion to obtain a new consensus.

☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 15:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deciduous Maple, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Deciduous Maple! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	You deserve a barnstar for your valiant struggle at the white supremacy article. Keep the darkness at bay. Amlaera (talk) 21:47, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My edit summary

It occurs to me that my edit summary may seem a bit pointy: "The RfC is not closed. stop changing this before it closes". The general "stop" sounds like it's just directed at you, but that was not my intention. It's more a response to the multiple changes by multiple people to the contentious part of the lead before the RfC has run its course. While obviously I don't disagree with what you changed it to (i.e. I prefer it to the current wording), I think it should stay as it was at the outset until which time a clear consensus forms (and/or the RfC is closed). --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm Grayfell. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from White supremacy. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 04:40, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing about what I removed was necessary. Please don't revert edits that shouldn't be reverted. Deciduous Maple (talk) 04:54, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history at White supremacy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You've violated WP:3RR after specifically having been warned. Self revert now and resolve on the talk page. Grayfell (talk) 05:33, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"resolve on the talk page" That's what I've been trying to do all along, m8. Deciduous Maple (talk) 05:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, that's not how it works. Reverting to your preferred version against multiple editors and long-standing consensus is edit warring. You've made 4 reverts, and that's too many. Grayfell (talk) 05:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning about this. You know the rules about edits warring. You continued edit warring despite this warning in this edit EvergreenFir (talk) 07:22, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Grayfell (talk) 01:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

/pol/ thread

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/115678459/personal-army (archive)

Hello, /pol/. I come seeking assistance arguing for the editing of the "White Supremacy" wikipedia article. The article begins with calling white supremacy a "racist ideology," which I think should be removed. If any of you have an autoconfirmed Wikipedia account, could you please help me edit it as described? Also, participating in the talk page would be helpful as well.

I am Deciduous Maple, for the record.

Is this you? --ChiveFungi (talk) 23:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and so is this: http://8ch.net/pol/res/9442467.html Does it matter? Deciduous Maple (talk) 05:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 23:37, 8 March 2017 edit ChiveFungi (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,615 edits →/pol/ thread: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:06, 9 March 2017 edit undo Deciduous Maple (talk \| contribs) 66 edits →/pol/ thread Next edit →
Line 124:		Line 124:

	Is this you? --[[User:ChiveFungi\|ChiveFungi]] ([[User talk:ChiveFungi\|talk]]) 23:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)		Is this you? --[[User:ChiveFungi\|ChiveFungi]] ([[User talk:ChiveFungi\|talk]]) 23:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
			:Yes, and so is this: <nowiki>http://8ch.net/pol/res/9442467.html</nowiki> Does it matter? [[User:Deciduous Maple\|Deciduous Maple]] ([[User talk:Deciduous Maple#top\|talk]]) 05:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)