User talk:Arman ad60: Difference between revisions
Arman ad60 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Doug Weller (talk | contribs) Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on History of Islam. (TW) |
||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
I am copying within Wikipedia. It will take some more time. I will give the sources later.[[User:Arman ad60|Arman ad60]] ([[User talk:Arman ad60#top|talk]]) 23:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC) |
I am copying within Wikipedia. It will take some more time. I will give the sources later.[[User:Arman ad60|Arman ad60]] ([[User talk:Arman ad60#top|talk]]) 23:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC) |
||
== December 2015 == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:History of Islam]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Doug Weller|Doug Weller]] ([[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]]) 21:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:39, 6 December 2015
Article talk pages
Please WP:ARCHIVE talk conversations instead of simply removing them, as you did at Talk:History of Islam. clpo13(talk) 02:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2015
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Doug Weller (talk) 07:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Belated welcome
|
The above provides a good basic summary of some of our most important policies and guidelines. It would probably be in your own interests to review them. John Carter (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Your sandbox
I've deleted it because of your copyright violations, which you deny although they are obvious. As an aside, words like "sadly" aren't appropriate for an encyclopedia. Anymore copyright violations and you may be blocked. Doug Weller (talk) 14:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Sandbox
I am doing some experiment about the article in this sand box. I am writing here based on the other articles about them in Wikipedia. But I am writing in my own language. And in terms of sources I am using the sources from there.Arman ad60 (talk) 20:21, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia
I am copying within Wikipedia. It will take some more time. I will give the sources later.Arman ad60 (talk) 23:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
December 2015
Your recent editing history at History of Islam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller (talk) 21:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)