Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:42, 8 August 2014

Arbitration Committee proceedings

Case requests

Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.

[edit]

Open cases

Currently, no arbitration cases are open.

[edit]

Recently closed cases (Past cases)

Case name	Closed
Yasuke	13 Nov 2024

Clarification and Amendment requests

Currently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.

Arbitrator motions

No arbitrator motions are currently open.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Carrite, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Morris Hillquit. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Marek.69 ^talk 20:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy thoughts

Not alone

Thank you. Good to know I'm not alone in that view. Antandrus (talk) 17:58, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That made me a grouchy Santa. Carrite (talk) 18:01, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

the Bad Site

Saw your comment on FAs at WR: "I've submitted none of my articles to the A/GA/FA process and I never will. When I'm done, it's a B -- and it's perfectly......................... satisfactory.".

Same here. I think Fishery Protection Squadron is my best one, but I can't be bothered to put it forward for GA and go through all the nonsense with the manual of style and dashes in the right place. It teaches people, and that's good enough for me. The Cavalry (Message me) 00:58, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

✰

		The Original Barnstar
		Came here via my watchlist, which I have seen you on frequently. You have expanded quite a few of my stubs. Thanks for that! Reading your talk page you also appear to be doing a lot of other work I approve of, so cheers :) jorgenev (t\|c\|s) 07:29, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

I do know that you have clear views on administration. At the same time, in one perspective of mine, there might be no harm in giving mature editors like you additional tools that they may utilize in times of need to improve the project; and may not utilize when they are editing. Of course, my view may be gravely incorrect. But there's no harm in asking you - would you up for adminship? It'll be a privilege to nominate you. Kind regards. Wifione ^Message 18:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Summary of reply: "Thanks, but no thanks." Carrite (talk)

Silk Purse Award

		Silk Purse Award
		I am both pleased and honored to present you with the Silk Purse Award in appreciation for your improvements to the Cynthia Basinet article, essentially changing what was seen as a sow's ear into a terrific silk purse. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:38, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say hello Thanks and Happy New Year.

		The Original Barnstar
		I see you are still encouraging new editors and you are helping anyone who asks you to in a mature and objective way. Just wanted to say I have never forgot how you help me in the first few weeks when I wanted to throw a computer monitor out of the window at times. You are the best wishing you a great 2012 It is always reassuring to new editors that you are here JoeyD2010 (talk) 08:24, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Sadly, too few disputes here seem to be independently resolved well. Your actions at an AfD are deeply appreciated and deserve recognition. VQuakr (talk) 00:32, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For your special work to help build the place where neutral should be keep! Farewellmyfriend (talk) 02:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar

The Genuine Barnstar

Tim, this is just the second barnstar I've ever presented. You and I haven't chatted much in recent months, but every time I see your work here, I am impressed and gladdened that an editor such as you is active here. I took this photo in Petaluma, California, home town of my father-in-law, and also home of Jewish socialist chicken ranchers 100 years ago. That's the milieu he grew up in. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:40, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		For your excellent detective work in finding solid sources for Donald Duncan. Thanks for your hard work! I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 21:22, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for your sensible comments at Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost/2012-10-01/Paid_editing.

Bearian (talk) 20:50, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Carrite/Tim,

It is another moment of integrity, one in a long list, where the principal, principled defenders of free speech and critics of harassment of conservatives are leftists, notably you (Carrite). Well done! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 11:43, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	For being level headed, helpful and polite wrt Sally Season Sædon^talk 00:48, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About zombies

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		For this. Made me chuckle. Good work! xanchester (t) 09:12, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just the right words

		The Socratic Barnstar
		For giving it the whoopty fuckin' doo on the Lynette Nusbacher AFD NetNus (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

For making me smile at the end of a long day. Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 11:10, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I left a more detailed comment at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/Proposed decision#General thanks to the parties & participants, but I wanted to thank you and the other parties to the arbitration case for your excellent conduct throughout the process. You should also know that the case is due to close in a few hours (about midnight UTC at the earliest). Hersfold non-admin^(t/a/c) 17:21, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I misjudged you

You would make a great administrator.

Hypothetically speaking, I mean. Obviously it's not for everyone. Kurtis ^(talk) 20:10, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nice words. We are indeed dealing with hypotheticals here, as I have no interest in the buttons. Happy editing. Carrite (talk) 20:23, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know that, which is precisely why I used the term "hypothetically speaking". :-) Kurtis ^(talk) 14:17, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for creating the new Victor Kamkin Bookstore article, and for all of your work to improve Wikipedia! Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:07, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	For this comment. Bearian (talk) 17:28, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	For your kind words here. Bearian (talk) 20:20, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Passing comment

Beautifully said. Really. I wish everyone on the project would read that, especially the long-time contributors, the more burnt-out ones. Antandrus (talk) 03:53, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate it very much, you're one of my Wikipedia heroes. Best, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 04:21, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

For making me laugh today. I loved the Timbo rule about IP editors being dressed moose at hunting season time. FYI you have two rule #6.

...William 00:38, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		For keeping up the spirit of collegiality and not allowing differences over policy to become personal. Coretheapple (talk) 18:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar

Brilliant!

"It's a mix of grey hats and black hats currently. We all agree that the black hats need to become grey hats pronto or to wind up at Boot Hill. Yee haw. WMF is trying to eliminate both grey hats and black hats by banning headgear. That won't make spottin' the bad guys any easier, pardner! Carrite (talk) 16:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)"

Whoop-ee-ti-yi-ow git along little dogies! (Gandy yodels a soothing tune to the herd as she rounds um up and heads um out.) Gandydancer (talk) 17:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You Have Mail...

Civility Specialist II

Tell me you are joking! This sounds like a really bad dystopian film. Viriditas (talk) 10:06, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just trying to keep an open mind... Carrite (talk) 14:34, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Carrite, I just want to let you know how much I appreciate your great sense of humor. We need more of that around here. Viriditas (talk) 00:33, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Khazar2

I assumed you were being ironic here, as I'm British. But I often get that wrong with Americans and assume they are being ironic when they're not. If you were being ironic, can you explain why please. DeCausa (talk) 12:53, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message - I'm glad you see it that way too. DeCausa (talk) 15:39, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bulimia Banquet

added a link pointing to El Segundo

Friedrich Wilhelm Fritzsche

added a link pointing to Reichstag

Mystic Records

added a link pointing to Silvertone Records

Rank and File (band)

added a link pointing to New Wave

The Flyboys (band)

added a link pointing to The Avengers

Youth Brigade (band)

added a link pointing to Oi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent AfD

Hey, Carrite. I hope this AfD merge result turned out better than you anticipated: Florida Gators football#Ring of Honor. Let me know what you think. I'm still tightening the text in the particular section, but there's also a huge job to purge a lot of the cruft that the article has accumulated as a whole over the years. Too many young editors think these articles should be a repository of every detail of the current season, and it inevitably creates an unsourced mess in search of an editor. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:30, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dirtlawyer1 - You're good. Hmmm, I wonder if there should be two different levels of content people at Wikipedia: "Contributors" and "Editors." You're an Editor. (You're right about drive-by newbies dumping in cruft, that is a tendency for "big" topics over time...) best, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 17:35, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Media Viewer RfC draft principles & findings

Hello. This is a courtesy note that the draft findings and principles in the Media Viewer RfC case have now been posted. The drafters of the proposed decision anticipate a final version of the PD will be posted after 11 August. You are welcome to give feedback on the workshop page. For the Committee, Lord Roem ~ (talk) 02:41, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interim reply

Hi, I'm away from home with limited internet access this week. I'll email you when I return, on the weekend. Tony (talk) 10:40, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

McCullough

I suggest you copy and preserve the various links for article improvement. Either off-wiki or in your sandbox. My feeling is the article will be AFD'd, but building a new one that will pass muster would be helpful. In the meantime, McCullough's experience with WP can provide "experience" or background for new poetry. Something like "How do I love Wikipedia? Let me count the edits...." – S. Rich (talk) 15:42, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orange Mike got this one wrong. I usually hate working on pieces that are bogged in bitter AfD debates — not wanting to flush three hours of work if it ends Delete — but I might just make an exception here. This strikes me as one of those cases that Wikipedia a a project really needs to get right. Carrite (talk) 15:47, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hi, I have learned a lot about Wikipedia in the last 24 hours, and I appreciate note. It will work out however it works out. I'm not going to sweat it. Thank you. 107.107.58.92 (talk) 21:03, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Humour

[1]. "Children are very time-intensive pets, as anyone who has spent time around them and their owners knows". You know, that could have been quite funny if you'd done it right. Instead it makes you look like a massive fucking cock. Just saying. Pedro : Chat 20:33, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was pretty funny. I invite you to now kindly keep off of my talk page as part of my Zero Tolerance for Harassment by Imbeciles™ policy... PING!!! Pedro Carrite (talk) 20:38, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More than a pleasure Carrite. I don't try to deal with the fuckwits on here if I can, but in this instance I thought I'd make an exception - once and only once. Cheers. Pedro : Chat 20:42, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:38, 8 August 2014 edit Carrite (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 94,932 edits →Humour ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:42, 8 August 2014 edit undo Pedro (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 22,738 edits →Humour: not a problem! Next edit →
Line 291:		Line 291:

	: I thought it was pretty funny. I invite you to now kindly keep off of my talk page as part of my Zero Tolerance for Harassment by Imbeciles™ policy... PING!!! {{u\|Pedro}} [[User:Carrite\|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite#top\|talk]]) 20:38, 8 August 2014 (UTC)		: I thought it was pretty funny. I invite you to now kindly keep off of my talk page as part of my Zero Tolerance for Harassment by Imbeciles™ policy... PING!!! {{u\|Pedro}} [[User:Carrite\|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite#top\|talk]]) 20:38, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
			::More than a pleasure Carrite. I don't try to deal with the fuckwits on here if I can, but in this instance I thought I'd make an exception - once and only once. Cheers. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Pedro\|<b>Pedro</b>]] : [[User_talk:Pedro\|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;"> Chat </font>]] </span></small> 20:42, 8 August 2014 (UTC)