User talk:Deb: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:58, 7 October 2013

we are trying to write a page about Business and Management research based on the book 'Research methods for business students'. And we did not find any page about this subject. We have searched : management and business research, research in business, research management. We didn't find anything. Could we have just half an hour to improve the page ? Following wikipedia standard.

Coming here to ask why I deleted your article? Read this page first...

And please SIGN YOUR POSTS, otherwise I don't know who is asking me the question!

Archives: 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

Deletion of Cenex

Dear user,

I am user Andrei.Varban and I noticed you have deleted the Cenex page. All information was referenced according to both internal information from the company website and external information from other websites. Please highlight the sentences you believe require rewording and those who you believe require additional references. If not additional external references (links) exists this doesn't mean the information is not accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrei.varban (talk • contribs) 11:56, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately references from the company website are not considered independent, and there were no others. Deb (talk) 11:58, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How could I add information about the company and its projects if other independent sources have not talked about it? How much can I use from the company's website? Finally, could you provide me the deleted page code via email at andrei.varban@cenex.co.uk so I can redo the work in the sandbox and try to find independent articles mentioning the projects? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrei.varban (talk • contribs) 12:06, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"How could I add information about the company and its projects if other independent sources have not talked about it" ...sums it up. If they haven't, you can't. Ciao! Basket _Feudalist 12:10, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will look for third party sources. Could I please have the wiki code back as I didn't save my work and would like to have the structure Please email it to andrei.varban@cenex.co.uk and I will include sections for which I can also have independent references? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrei.varban (talk • contribs) 12:17, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of 3D copyshop

Check out the "debate" below. If you are a new editor, it will give you an idea of how not to get your own way. Deb (talk) 08:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Debate

In your deletion comments, you claim: "CSD:G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: no refs except a spammy link"

I note that you totally failed to abide by the condition that "improvement or deletion of an offending section, if practical, is preferable to deletion of an entire page".
You could have, in this case, removed the alleged "spammy link" but you instead opted to delete the page.
I have read and understood "Reasons for deletion":

1. Content that meets at least one of the criteria for speedy deletion As you glaim, G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion

"Pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. Note: An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion. "Promotion" does not necessarily mean commercial promotion: anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organisation, a point of view, etc."

So my intention with writing the page was to "describe the subject from a neutral point of view". Apart from poor style, I think my article did indeed do that and I simple linked to the two currently most popular community hubs / repositories for 3d printed objects.

2. Copyright violations and other material violating Wikipedia's non-free content criteria n/a

3. Vandalism, including inflammatory redirects, pages that exist only to disparage their subject, patent nonsense, or gibberish n/a

4. Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject) According to G11, you think the page was unmbiguous advertising? Who was I supposed to be advertising for exactly?

5. Content forks (unless a merger or redirect is appropriate) n/a

6. Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes) n/a

7. Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed The page was deleted so quickly we did not even have the chance to look and find more sources!

8. Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP and so forth) n/a

9. Articles that breach Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons n/a

10. Redundant or otherwise useless templates n/a

11. Categories representing overcategorization n/a

12. Files that are unused, obsolete, or violate the Non-free policy n/a

13. Any other use of the article, template, project, or user namespace that is contrary to the established separate policy for that namespace. I believe I got the naming / capitalisation right?

14. Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia 3D copyshops are real places just like 2D copyshops (photocopying shops) are real places. The technology is just newer.

Desired Outcome / Resolution

With great power comes great responsibility young wiki editor. Please refrain from using the delete button before the edit button.
You appear to delete first and have other people ask questions later and in this case, your actions killed the collaborative process which was meant to create a great page. I suggest you open a dialogue with users in the future in accordance with your own communities guidelines.
I would like you to restore the deleted page immediately and please don't simply delete it again without discussing it first. Samthetechie (talk) 7:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of List of Major Appliances

Why on earth did you delete my page? I had just created it less than an hour previously and am still writing/editing it. Nyth83 (talk) 13:57, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now I see you changed the title of the article. I was in the middle of editin and my page dissapeard on me and I lost a bunch of edits. Very frustrating. Could you please check with my before you make a change like this? The name you changed it to is not appropriate as there are many gas burning ranges in the list and there are also a few wood and coal burning ranges also. Nyth83 (talk) 14:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You called it "List of Major Appliances". That would mean "Iron", "Cooker", "Television" and so on. Please give it a bit of thought. Deb (talk) 14:44, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article title included the word 'major' to specifically exclude small appliances. I inserted a reference to the article Major appliance in the summary intro. I also moved the article to remove the word 'electric' from the title. Nyth83 (talk) 15:13, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it didn't include the word "manufacturers", which is what you actually wanted to list! Deb (talk) 15:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I left 'manufacturers' in for now even though the list includes both the brand names and the names of the manufacturers. Most consumers, I do not believe, make a distinction between the brand and the manufacturer. It is even more confusing because of parts sharing. For example, I recently service a Kenmore refrigerator that had an LG water valve in it. If you have a suggestion about how to title the article to clarify this I will gladly move the article again. Nyth83 (talk) 15:55, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's fine, it's just you are missing the point about the difference between an appliance and a brand/manufacturer. Deb (talk) 19:25, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Desnos Toussaint Yed Page

Hi Deb I noticed that you removed my contribution, I want to confirm and verify that this is not promotional or advertising content, I will re upload the content. can kindly not remove it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desnos_Toussaint_Yed Thank you Zwelisikhakhane — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZweliSikhakhane (talk • contribs) 13:19, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please let me know when you do. Cheers. Basket _Feudalist 13:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have Added The References, The content was pre approved by Desnos himself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZweliSikhakhane (talk • contribs) 13:33, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, that is irrelevant, as the content gets approved by other WP editors and under various policies, not the subject themselves. Which I would have thought been pretty obvious. Basket _Feudalist 14:01, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On edit: The situation seems to have resolved itself, my friend. Basket _Feudalist 14:44, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Fernanda Gomes page

Hello. I think Fernanda Gomes as a brazilian artist has enough international interest and recognition to be in the Wikipedia. Sorry for not adding basic data. There is information on http://www.informador.com.mx/cultura/2011/287015/6/una-muestra-sin-nombre.htm, and if you re-create the article, or let me do it, I will add some basic data to give the article a proper start. Thanks. Caravasar (talk)

Deletion of Pedro Barateiro page

Hello. I think Pedro Barateiro as a young portuguese artist has enough international interest and recognition to be in the Wikipedia. Sorry for not adding basic data. There is information on http://independent.academia.edu/PedroBarateiro, and if you re-create the article, or let me do it, I will add some basic data to give the article a proper start. Thanks. Caravasar (talk)

Deletion of Veit Stratmann page

Hello. I think Veit Stratmann as an artist has enough international interest and recognition to be in the Wikipedia. Sorry for not adding basic data. There is information on the French Wikipedia (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veit_Stratmann), and if you re-create the article, or let me do it, I will add some basic data to give the article a proper start. Thanks. Caravasar (talk)

Deletion of Line and Space Article

Hi Deb, I disagree with your speedy deletion of this page, I don't believe it was advertising. Line and Space is a prominent architecture firm that has been designing buildings for over 30 years and sources from books and notable magazine articles were used clearly supporting statements in the article. Thier buildings are often used as precedence studies for college students and I thought it would be helpful to have an article on Wikipedia. I hope you can help un-delete the article or let me know what led you to think it was advertising so I can edit the page. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emstarace (talk • contribs) 22:41, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deb, I've looked over the articles that you have referred me to and still feel that article that I wrote is relevant. There are many articles on Wikipedia about architecture firms and architects that are in the same tone as mine that lack citations, and those pages were not deleted, I think they were left posted to give other contributors a chance to improve them. I don't understand why this article about Line and Space is not afforded the same opportunity. If you can be more specific about which statements you feel are advertising or lack NPOV I can edit them or add more specific citations. Thanks Emstarace —Preceding undated comment added 18:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

new

No ijust want to make this company on wiki, whats wrong with this

Nomination of India Future Society for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article India Future Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India Future Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Singularity42 (talk) 22:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree with your deletion

Hi Deb, I created the Perry Noble entry, not as a means for promotion, but rather to start a page that had never existed for a prominent person. The article was written from a neutral point of view, highlighting a few notable events in the person's life. I also did my best to cite sources. What specific changes would you suggest in order to create the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonhortonsc (talk • contribs) 17:22, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Deb,

It seems as many pages have been deleted by you, some maybe deserving of your decision, but I was reading a page yesterday about pbolist and today it is gone with indication that you had flagged it for deletion. The article seemed to be written from a neutral stand point and did have crappy sources, but I have also worked with pbolist and know that it is a credible company operating out of florida, maybe you could post some revision suggestions instead of simply flagging pages.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmyrossfield (talk • contribs) 01:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Substing templates

Hi! Just wanted to remind you that when you use a welcome template on someone's talkpage, that you should always substitute the template. (For example, you should use{{subst:welcome}} rather than {{welcome}}.) Cheers, — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 23:41, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Wales Coast Path WikiProject

I see you're a member of WikiProject Wales and have contributed to Welsh articles. There's a new project, Llwybrau Byw!|Living Paths! under development which you might be able to contribute to. Lonely Planet rated the coast of Wales "the best region on Earth" in 2012, yet there is a very low number of articles on the history and culture of places along the Coastal Path and the many and various activities and attractions. This promises to be an exciting project as it gathers momentum with many Users joining in. Let's make this WikiProject, like the path itself, the best on earth! Cymrodor (talk) 08:07, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NicoBloc

Hello Deb - ref your message about NicoBloc page being promotional. After the previous comments about promotion, you will see that there is no promotion or advertising just a statement as to what the product is, how it works and a reference to independent scholarly published articles. What specifically do you find to be promotional? Haymark99 (talk) 08:23, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

need help with edits to Lettingweb ltd 10/09/2013

Hello Deb, could you suggest a few edits to the Letting web Ltd page that was taken down this morning. There was no intention of creating advertorial content but the company helped out quite a bit communicating the my deposit Scotland project last year as well as having a history on the Scottish property scene so I thought they were worthy of a bit of recognition.

Kindest regards, Fenella — Preceding unsigned comment added by GalliesDfox (talk • contribs) 11:06, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of RNB Research

Dear Deb

We refer to your recent communication sent.

Please note there is no promotional or advertising material for the page RNB Research.

We recently did changes to the page removing some memberships of the company which it was not.

We have only provide true information non promotional.

Also RNB Research is one of the largest research agency in India and is the only agency have predicted correct election results for the last 20 years.

you can check all tv new channel etc.....

We would like you to advsie what you though was promotional so as we can explain you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rnbradhey (talk • contribs) 11:40, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Other Typist

Hello Deb,

I noticed you deleted an article about the 2013 novel The Other Typist with the reason that it's promotional. I'm not entirely sure what made the article promotional. Can you shed some light on this?

I read Wikipedia:DEL-REASON#Reasons_for_deletion

Thank you

-- Joel M.Chat ✐ 20:10, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Vicidial Page

Hi Deb,

Vicidial is an opensource project and the page was just a start to get the community to start to contribute. I don't understand why it was taken down. The are pages for microsoft office, Ubuntu linux, ect. all kinds of software. Please put the page back or explain the difference? I understand why you would think it is advertising, but it's an opensource porject. I never once say it's the "best" or "grandest" or left my own opinion. referencing ect will follow as soon as the community approve. Please see this forum post. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rudolfmdlt (talk • contribs) 20:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's funny how people think something that's free can't be advertised. Deb (talk) 03:36, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point.

So before I reference the article and fix the technical aspects that got it removed - what about the content was "offensive"? Can you give me a short bullet list of things to fix as far as content is concerned so that I can fix it, reference it and the submit it for review? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rudolfmdlt (talk • contribs) 08:21, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing was "offensive" as far as I'm aware. I've given advice on your talk page.Deb (talk) 09:30, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've followed the process on this and decided to give it a try myself, here is my version of the Vicidial page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DomeDan/sandbox I'm (as Rudolf) a user of the software and have no interest in advertising it, been reading the guides and have tried to write it by the guidelines, but notability was a bit hard, found at least one third-party source but the rest is mostly companies describing vicidial because they commercially offer the service of installing it and I don't want to use that as references. DomeDan (talk) 14:55, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip! I will seak assistance in the Teahouse and then try to move it wiki/Vicidial when its done! DomeDan (talk) 16:08, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of MachineWorks Ltd. page

Hi deb, I don't think the page I created should have been deleted. It was an unpromotional page which I had not finished adding too before it was deleted. The page was about MachineWorks Ltd. and was aimed at speaking about the history behind the company which involved changing the standards of the CAM industry by making it standard to have the simulation type products. Could you let me know what could be done to get the wiki page up? Thanks --Max.machineworks (talk) 14:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Shadows of Esteren page

Hello, Deb. Thank you for your attempt to assist with my post, but I feel that you were too quick to delete it entirely. I feel that as a newcommer to wikipedia, your assistance in structuring the page to suit better with wiki standards would be more beneficial and useful for me, rather than simply rushing to take it down. Please could you perhaps consider assisting with it in a more constructive and structural manner? I did mention on the talk page of the entry that additional support and assistance would be very much appreciated, so if you could please do so, I would be very happy with that. Many thanks! Justin.Parallax (talk) 10:17, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

STA Travel page

Hi Deb, Thank you for letting me know about the deletion of my post; I have reviewed the post in detail and will resubmit one which has been appropriately edited. As a new user of Wikipedia, you can be assured that I read the welcome page and guidelines before starting on my first post. I also read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DONTBITE. As a newcomer to Wikipedia, it would have been more helpful of you to point out the areas of the article that appeared promotional, so that I could learn from it, rather than deleting the entire article so soon after posting. On my next attempt, I would still appreciate your constructive help and assistance. Many thanks! ~~Stephomitchell~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephomitchell (talk • contribs) 16:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I find it very odd how people think my sole purpose here is to help them out with articles that don't meet the criteria for inclusion. It's even stranger how often, after the article has been deleted and they have been told why, they proceed to upload the same article with identical wording and expect a different result! Aren't people funny? Deb (talk) 16:57, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Your repeated violation of WP:BLP and WP:OR at The White Queen (TV series)‎ must stop. Strakey's general comments about Philippa's works made before the Television series aired cannot be WP:COATRACKED into the article about the TV series. Consider this your final warning about WP:BLP violations. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:17, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're cracked. Basket _Feudalist 12:52, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since I'm not guilty of any violations, feel free to take it as far as you like. (Incidentally, his name's Starkey, not Strakey.) Deb (talk) 15:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Alba page

Thanks for prompt New Page patrol and heads-up re link. I will find another. Bellagio99 (talk) 18:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Great Value Storage page

This page that I created was deleted. I can add more sources and pertinent information if needed. It's a large self-storage company that spans across the US, and the information that was written is just facts about the company. Also, I do not see how it is blatant advertisement. It was written with a similar structure to the CubeSmart page, which is currently active.

Kalel2323 (talk) 18:58, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...not for much longer, thanks for drawing it to my attention CubeSmart has just been nominated for deletion. Cheers! Basket _Feudalist 19:49, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! That is what is meant by "shooting oneself in the foot"
Well done,

!
— Gareth Griffith-Jones | The Welsh Buzzard: Cardiff born and bred | — 19:59, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if I understand what's going on. I was discussing reasons why I didn't feel that the page I created should be deleted and provided an example. In doing so, I hoped I could get feedback on what would be more appropriate information so the page isn't deleted, but it just seems like you're very smug about deleting pages. Gareth's comment was useless as well, as CubeSmart was just an example not a page that I created. My foot is unharmed. Regardless, I am not trying to pull a fast one or trying to be slick by any means, just trying to put my company's facts and history online. So let me try this again. Is the Uncle Bob's Self Storage page a better example to follow?
Kalel2323 (talk) 22:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was *winking*. Apologies if you were upset by my post, but it was in response to Basket _Feudalist's post, not yours.
— | Gareth Griffith-Jones | The Welsh Buzzard | — 22:26, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was responding to Basket as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalel2323 (talk • contribs) 22:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know. That was clear to me.
— | Gareth Griffith-Jones | The Welsh Buzzard | — 10:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Kalel, any other pages you want deleted, you'll let me know, eh? Cheers- Basket _Feudalist 10:19, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great, so you're just a douche. Well thanks for the help and advice. Kalel2323 (talk) 13:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Catverine. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Holden Viaduct, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Catverine (talk) 21:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "The White_Queen_(TV_series)#Historicity". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 00:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Beekman School

Hi Deb,

I took your comments and made a number of revisions to The Beekman School. Please let me know if I need to add/edit change anything else. Also, how do I remove the two flags that are currently on the page?

Thanks! dbosleyjr — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbosleyjr (talk • contribs) 19:08, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How to create and edit a new page without be deleated

Deb - this is someone from the New York City Comptroller's Office writing a page for the first time. Checkbook NYC was currently being edited. I assume most articles take a few days to write completely. How can I do this without the page being delete before I'm finished? Is there a way to restore the previous work? Thanks 19:34, 17 September 2013 Deb (talk | contribs) deleted page Checkbook NYC (A1: Short article without enough context to identify the subject)Awimber (talk) 21:53, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Band Scrims and Band Backdrops

Deb - please clarify why you have deleted this page. The article was encyclopedic in nature. If you'd like a more diverse range of sources (the original articles did indeed have sources to only one external website since that is the best site for band banners info), please let me know. I appreciate your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themark1234 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How to re-use abandoned user name?

Hi Deb, you had deleted an unused page (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yoose/quant&action=edit&redlink=1) and I was wondering if it is possible to re-use the username 'yoose'? Our company YOOSE (www.yoose.com) would like to create a wikipedia article about the company and use the yoose username for that. Thanks for your help Christian Geissendoerfer CEO, YOOSE Pte. Ltd. Singapore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgeissendoerfer (talk • contribs) 08:57, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Snark

"(fixed edit by 202.81.243.116, who I'm sure wasn't really trying to disguise the fact that he wrote this section in two instalments)" You didn't sign or date your summary at all, yet you imply that my not cluttering my summary with timestamps documenting every revision I make is "disguising" something? You may have noticed that I repaired the coding error you made (because it also screwed up the following contributions), but managed not to take a swipe at you in the edit comment. You're not taking the High Road in this issue. 202.81.243.116 (talk) 15:49, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

-)

Crushpath

Hey Deb -- I tried to make the Crushpath piece objective. Can you let me know where it failed? The company is rather large and worthy of a listing. Thank you JoshAnish (talk) 21:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I told u not to mess up with my page I was editing it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laura moody woody woods 2002 (talk • contribs) 14:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

breaking links

Hi,

When moving an article like Wik Mungkan language (), could you leave a redirect so incoming links aren't broken ?

Thanks , — kwami (talk) 20:09, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are no article links to this, nor should there be. Deb (talk) 21:02, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not anymore , because I fixed them . But there were a couple dozen linked through half a dozen redirects . The redirects would've gotten deleted if we hadn't caught them in time . — kwami (talk) 01:38, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Testing "Opensooq" before going LIVE

Hi Deb, You ordered to delete "Opensooq" page.. So I changed the content and posted on my userspace: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Existed .. Please, have a look, let me know if the content is okay to create "Opensooq" wikipage again, if not please edit it and make it sound wikipedic. Thanks ~ Existed Sept 22, 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Existed (talk • contribs) 13:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Deb,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, — Scott • talk 12:27, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Jim Munroe, Magician page

Deb, I created the initial Jim Munroe, Magician page due to the fact that I search for "Jim Munroe" and only found a page for Jim Munroe, the Canadian author. The basic page I created was for the purpose of providing clarification on the other Jim Munroe. This is not an attempt at advertising but an honest attempt by a fellow, al beit novice, wikipedia member to expand the information presented on wikipedia. Please restore the deleted page. Jimdmurphy (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:30, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deb, when you reverted the changes that I made to the Jim Munroe, author page, you left a comment "even if there was an article on him, it wouldn't be at this title", but did not give this novice contributor a suggestion on the proper title. I am assuming that "Jim Munroe (magician)" is the appropriate title. Correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimdmurphy (talk • contribs) 14:00, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Retallack

Hi. As a contributor to the AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Retallack on Greg Retallack I let you know that there is a debate going on the article's talk page Talk:Gregory Retallack about how to implement the findings of the AfD . Xxanthippe (talk) 00:08, 26 September 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Frances de la Tour

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Frances de la Tour#Possible copyright violation. -- Trevj (talk) 15:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Template:Z48 -- Trevj (talk) 15:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review of DYK Abhilash Tomy

Hi, I received a message saying you had reviewed this dyk nom but I dont see any review on the page. Could you clarify? Thanks. Regstuff (talk) 11:59, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Parvin Mirzazade

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am working for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Azerbaijan and created a page for H.E. Parvin Mirzazade, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary. Unfortunately it has been deleted. Please instruct me, how to restore or create the same page without having any problems.

Here's the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parvin_Mirzazade

Deletion of Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies

Hi Deb, Today you deleted an entry I did for the above mentioned journal and mentioned "advertising" and "soapbox." In no way was I "advertising" anything with my entry about a FREE online access journal to which I am not affiliated. I am a graduate student at the University of Houston-Downtown in the Master of Science in Professional Writing and Technical Communication program and this was an assignment for my class. Please explain to me what you feel I was "advertising" and what "soapbox" you feel I was on. Msjameecox (talk) 17:24, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Msjameecox[reply]

Deletion of ecoPayz

I fail to see how the page i created could be altered to make it so that it doesn't appear as advertising.

This isn't advertising as I am not asking people to perform any sort of action. This is purely an informational piece. I fail to understand how you can write an article detailing the information of a company, product, term without giving all the relevant information.

This is an article describing the company. Many other pages give information on companies. Indeed on of our competitors Neteller also has a page on Wikipedia which is very similar to the one i wrote.

R martin84 (talk) 15:26, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. Deb (talk) 16:39, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DELETED Liam Hanrahan Page, could you point out any advertising or such from that page, otherwise it needs re-instating, no links or anything were put on it, Tom Sefton

Could you not just take out the #teamhanrahan bit? sounds a bit drastic taking the whole page out, just saying!!

Congratulations

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.

```Buster Seven Talk 13:57, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, that's nice - thanks! Deb (talk) 14:54, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HAHA it is extremely easy to get to 10000000000 edits: just delete EVERY BRAND that is not Coca Cola, Apple, Facebook, Twitter, GM, .... Yeay! Congratulations! Keep it going — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkatzman (talk • contribs) 15:40, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And by nailing Philippa Gregory to the wall a 1000000 times!!! Basket _Feudalist 15:52, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pyinstaller A1?

I don't see how Pyinstaller was lacking in context. It clearly said it was a program that packages Python scripts into executables.-- Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 15:47, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it didn't - it said it was an "addon". And what's an executable, anyhow? Deb (talk) 17:19, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)...A Plantagenet in Tudor England perhaps?

Basket _Feudalist 17:47, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one! Deb (talk) 21:07, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re: Edit warring

Thanks! Anything in particular that drew you to post your message on my talkpage? Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 11:12, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Almost too afraid to ask - but yes please! Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 11:45, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+we are trying to write a page about Business and Management research based on the book 'Research methods for business students'. And we did not find any page about this subject. We have searched : management and business research, research in business, research management. We didn't find anything. Could we have just half an hour to improve the page ? Following wikipedia standard.
 {{bots|deny=DPL bot}}
 {{bots|deny=BracketBot}}