User talk:Mieszko 8

Welcome!

Hello, Mieszko 8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 19:35, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

SPI

I have asked for a Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Astronomer28 regarding your latest edits at Nicolaus Copernicus. HerkusMonte (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

WP:3RR

You're edit warring on Nicolaus Copernicus. You may be a sock, in which case this is irrelevant, but if not: please be aware of WP:3RR and related matters.

See-also: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Mieszko_8 reported_by_User:William M._Connolley_.28Result:_.29

William M. Connolley (talk) 18:09, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello Miesko 8. Please see WP:AN3#User:Mieszko 8 reported by User:William M. Connolley (Result: ). At first glance, it appears that you and Astronomer28 have both been editing against the long-term consensus about the nationality of Nicolaus Copernicus. It is possible you may be blocked for edit warring. You may be able to avoid sanctions if you will reply in the above discussion and agree to wait for consensus before changing the article again. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 20:09, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring at Nicolaus Copernicus

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Mieszko 8 reported by User:William M. Connolley (Result: Blocks). EdJohnston (talk) 06:05, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Warring to change the nationality of Nicolaus Copernicus, an article where nationalist disputes have occurred many times in the past. EdJohnston (talk) 06:13, 26 February 2013 (UTC)