User talk:Shimeru: Difference between revisions
→T2 SDE: recreated article |
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/436th Transportation Battalion (United States) |
||
Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
::There does appear to be a paucity of 3rd party sources, but I recreated the article with different content because the subject is notable. See [[Talk:T2_SDE]]. [[User:Obankston|Obankston]] ([[User talk:Obankston|talk]]) 20:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC) |
::There does appear to be a paucity of 3rd party sources, but I recreated the article with different content because the subject is notable. See [[Talk:T2_SDE]]. [[User:Obankston|Obankston]] ([[User talk:Obankston|talk]]) 20:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
==Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/436th Transportation Battalion (United States)== |
|||
You deleted [[436th Transportation Battalion (United States)]] even though there was no clear consensus to delete in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/436th Transportation Battalion (United States)]]. You apparently ignored the ''Keep'' argument, and you gave no reasons for why you deleted the article. AfD's are not a vote, and unless there is a clear consensus (not a majority) for deletion the article must not be deleted. If the closing admin unilaterally deletes the article after a discussion, ignoring arguments to keep the article, then why do we even bother having discussions? I request that you restore [[436th Transportation Battalion (United States)]] because there was no clear consensus to delete the article. [[User:Inniverse|Inniverse]] ([[User talk:Inniverse|talk]]) 04:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:01, 13 August 2010
Welcome to my talk page. If you leave me a message here, I will respond here. If I leave a message on your talk page, you may respond there; I'll be watching it. I prefer to have the entire conversation in one place; it makes it easier to follow. Also, if you leave a message here, please do not subsequently edit it except for grammar, spelling, link correction, and similar technical aspects. Thank you.
GOCE Newsletter
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive! We have now passed the halfway point, so here's an update. Progress Report - Progress toward the targets has been good. 751 articles out of the approximately 1,600 we would like to get completed by the end of the month were done by July 15, so we will be very close to meeting the target for volume. However, we would like to clear all of the 2008 articles from the backlog, and there are still 892 left to do. Please consider choosing one of these older articles when looking for something to copy edit. If we focus our firepower we can completely wipe out 2008 from the queue. Participation Report - 95 people signed up for the July drive. This is a great result compared to May, when we had 36. However, in May only one person that signed up didn't do any copy edits, and in July only 59 of the 95 have posted any copy edits on the big board. The task may seem insurmountable but please remember that if all 95 participants copy edit just one article a day from now until the end of the month, we will eliminate 1,300 more articles from the backlog. So please consider participating at whatever level you can! All contributions are appreciated. This newsletter was prepared for the GOCE by Diannaa (Talk), S Masters (talk), and The Raptor Let's talk. |
10k+ Copy Edit
The 10k Copy Edit Barnstar | ||
For copy editing the following articles:
during the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 backlog elimination drive. The Raptor You rang?/My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions 14:01, 1 August 2010 (UTC) |
Barnstars
The Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Star | |
For exceptional copyediting efforts during the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive, 80 articles with a combined total of 200,392 words, Shimeru is presented with this exclusive, brilliant, Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Star. --Diannaa (Talk) 17:32, 1 August 2010 (UTC) |
Special Barnstar: Largest Single Article | ||
This Special barnstar is awarded to Shimeru for editing the largest sinlge article during the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 backlog drive: List of Kenichi: The Mightiest Disciple characters (original size: 35,890 words). Your contributions are appreciated!--Diannaa (Talk) 18:14, 1 August 2010 (UTC) |
- Thanks! It's been a lot of fun, although I think I'll take a break for a couple of days; I usually don't edit at that pace. Shimeru 19:31, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Leaderboard Award—5K Articles—Co-Winner | ||
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Shimeru for copy editing 13 articles of 5,000 words or more during the WP:GOCE July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thank you so much for your contributions to the project. --Diannaa (Talk) 17:01, 2 August 2010 (UTC) |
Leaderboard Award—Word Count—Winner | ||
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Shimeru for copy editing articles totalling 200,392 words during the WP:GOCE July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thank you so much for your contributions to the project. --Diannaa (Talk) 17:01, 2 August 2010 (UTC) |
Leaderboard Award—Number of Articles—5th Place | ||
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Shimeru for copy editing 80 articles during the WP:GOCE July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thank you so much for your contributions to the project. --Diannaa (Talk) 17:01, 2 August 2010 (UTC) |
GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks to all who participated in the drive! Over 100 editors—including Jimbo Wales—signed up this time (nearly triple the participants of the May drive). This benefited the Guild as well as the articles in need of copy editing. You can see from the comparison graphs that we increased the number of completed copyedits substantially. Unfortunately, we were not able to meet our goal of completely wiping out 2008 from the queue. We also were not able to reduce the backlog to less than 6,000 articles. We suspect people were busy with real life summertime things, at least in the northern hemisphere! We were able to remove the months of January, February, March, April, and May from the backlog, and we almost wiped out the month of June. We reduced the backlog by 1,289 articles (17%), so all in all it was a very successful drive, and we will be holding another event soon. We'll come up with some new ideas to try to keep things fresh and interesting. Keep up the good work, everybody!
Coordinator: ɳorɑfʈ Talk! Co-coordinators: Diannaa TALK and S Masters (talk) | Newsletter by: The Raptor You rang?/My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 18:17, 1 August 2010 (UTC).
PACIFIC MERIDIAN PAGE
What the fuck? I spent 3 days translating this article from Russian Wikipedia! And you guys just deleted it without sending any notice to my e-mail! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Meridian_(film_festival)
I rewrote all text except official documents! I have all rights to use all information from that site!
I insist on restoring the page! Right NOW! Roman Naumenko (talk · contribs) 01:41, August 5, 2010
- I am composing a message to Roman Naumenko (who sent me the same note) giving my reasons for the ProD and explaining a little bit about how proposed deletion works. It would help if I had a copy of the article, for reference. Can you put it into my user space? I assume Roman kept a copy. Thanks. Peter Chastain (talk) 11:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Romanization for words of English origin
On the MOS:JP talk page, a discussion has been started about including or not including romanizations for words of English origin, such as Fainaru Fantajī in Final Fantasy (ファイナルファンタジー, Fainaru Fantajī) (for the sake of simplicity, I called this case "words of English origin", more information on semantics here).
Over the course of a month, it has become apparent that both the parties proposing to include or not include those romanizations cannot be convinced by the arguments or guidelines brought up by the other side. Therefore, a compromise is trying to be found that will satisfy both parties. One suggestion on a compromise has been given already, but it has not found unanimous agreement, so additional compromises are encouraged to be suggested.
One universally accepted point was to bring more users from the affected projects in to help achieve consensus, and you were one of those selected in the process.
What this invitation is:
- You should give feedback on the first suggested compromise and are highly encouraged to provide other solutions.
What this invitation is not:
- This is not a vote on including or excluding such romanizations.
- This is not a vote on compromises either.
It would be highly appreciated if you came over to the MOS:JP talk page and helped find a solution. Thank you in advance. Prime Blue (talk) 11:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
T2 SDE
Please restore this article. The article was deleted for lack of reliable sources to establish notability. The main website for the subject matter is T2 System Development Environment. The subject appears notable to me - if all mentions in Wikipedia of T2 SDE were wikilinked, this article would be referenced from 13 articles. Obankston (talk) 07:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- According to the deletion discussion, the article was deleted because of a lack of independent third-party sourcing. Do you know of any books, magazine or journal articles, or other such sources that would address those concerns? We can't reference ourselves. Shimeru 08:45, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- There does appear to be a paucity of 3rd party sources, but I recreated the article with different content because the subject is notable. See Talk:T2_SDE. Obankston (talk) 20:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/436th Transportation Battalion (United States)
You deleted 436th Transportation Battalion (United States) even though there was no clear consensus to delete in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/436th Transportation Battalion (United States). You apparently ignored the Keep argument, and you gave no reasons for why you deleted the article. AfD's are not a vote, and unless there is a clear consensus (not a majority) for deletion the article must not be deleted. If the closing admin unilaterally deletes the article after a discussion, ignoring arguments to keep the article, then why do we even bother having discussions? I request that you restore 436th Transportation Battalion (United States) because there was no clear consensus to delete the article. Inniverse (talk) 04:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)