User talk:Volunteer Marek

What do you think?

[[1]]

Important

[[2]] [[3]]

DYK for Lucas Welfare Cost of Fluctuations

On June 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lucas Welfare Cost of Fluctuations, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman 02:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

I wanted you to know I appreciated your statements on the 3RR notice board. It appears I still have much to learn regarding the policies and guidelines. To that end I have decided to relinquish rollback and return to manual editing for the near future. I want to earn the trust of editors in general; that desire is stronger with regard to those, like yourself, that have gone out of their way to help and support me. See ya 'round Tiderolls 00:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Lublin Ghetto

Ladnie ci zrobilem? A na pl mnie zbanowali. --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 01:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

1RR limit

Thatcher 03:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

reminder

remember when you said this? Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spieprzaj dziadu!. Ostap 15:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Lublin Ghetto

Thank you for your note. It's an interesting article. Frankly, I'm surprised Wikipedia didn't have an article about the ghetto previously. Thanks for taking care of that. :-) — [[::User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] (talk · contribs) 03:45, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

WP:AE

Hi, Skäpperöd just started another WP:AE against me and he also mentioned you and Jacurek.. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. Loosmark (talk) 17:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Lucas on cost of recession

Nice article. I've added a little bit on the equity premium, will expand if I get time.JQ (talk) 21:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

RfCU for Viriditas

Although you are not a party, I am letting you know that I cited an attack upon you and a comment of yours to Viriditas -- as one of many comments by other editors to Viriditas re his/her posting behavior -- in the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Viriditas, which covers Viriditas' WP:Wikihounding campaign. Mosedschurte (talk) 05:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Lublin Ghetto

On July 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lublin Ghetto, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Giants27 (

c|s) 08:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Appeal

Thanks for your note. I don't have any issue with you mentioning me. Good luck with your appeal. It does seem unfair that you would be sanctioned before you were given warning. — [[::User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] (talk · contribs) 04:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Please see also Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification#Request for clarification: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren#Discretionary sanctions.  Sandstein  13:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Notification

Notice of editing restrictions

File:Yellow warning.png

Notice: Under the terms of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren, "any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict (defined as articles which relate to Eastern Europe, broadly interpreted) if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.

Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision by an uninvolved administrator; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines."

Note: This notice is not effective unless given by an administrator and logged here.

-- Thatcher 20:11, 6 July 2009 (UTC)