User talk:Jmundo

---

Merry Christmas

	<font=3> Wishing you a "Feliz Navidad and a Happy new Year" Tony the Marine (talk)

Riff driven songs

Hi - someone has nominated the entire article on Riff driven songs for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Riff_driven and vote whether to delete or keep the article. Thanks! Geĸrίtzl (talk)

RfA thankspam

		Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which failed with 90/38/3; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral. Special thanks go out to Moreschi, Dougweller and Frank for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for your participation. I am currently concentrating my efforts on the Wikification WikiProject. It's fun! Please visit the project and wikify a few articles to help clear the backlog. If you can recruit some more participants, then even better. Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Itsmejudith (talk), 22:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Denbot (talk) 22:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Manuel Olivieri Sanchez

That was funny about your history teacher in Mayaguez. I believe that history teachers should stop relying only on what is written in the history books and should be required to research what they teach.

You see, history books are often written by biased historians who are influenced by the political powers of their countries, who determine which texts are going to be distributed in the educational system. That is the reason that many truths are often omitted and hidden. The Nazis' did this and so has every government. When I was in school, the history books made no mention of the Afro-American contributions, much less those made by Hispanics. When the United States took over Puerto Rico, the new government eliminated the history texts written by Brau and instead introduced the Americanized version written by the appointed head of education, Paul Miller. No wonder our own people are under the impression that we are underachievers who can only live of the American welfare system.

That is why I have made it my mission to write the truth and unbiased historical facts of our people. I love writing about people like Manuel Olivieri Sanchez, who had the "cojones" to do what he did, yet he like many others have fallen into the cracks of history and been forgotten. I just hope that our people by reading what we have written will say: "WoW! We are much more then entertainers and sportspeople."

Sorry for taking up so much of your talk space amigo, but I just wanted to share my believes with someone. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Jmundo. You have new messages at Politizer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Review and Disposition of Individuals Detained at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base and Closure of Detention Facilities

Thanks for putting the Copy to Wikisource template on that article; I didn't know that such a template existed. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 20:13, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boot Camp (film)

Your words here were much appreciated. Thank you. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:13, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Island Country

Hi. The delete proposal is restored. If there are references to support that the term is not a neologism, please provide them.Wotapalaver (talk) 11:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

A centralised discussion which may interest you

Hi. You may be interested in a centralised discussion on the subject of "lists of unusual things" to be found here. SP-KP (talk) 17:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Rollback

Hiya. I've fulfilled your request for rollback. Please review WP:RBK or ask me if you need any help with the tool. Thanks, and happy editing. Pedro :  Chat  16:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Indie Hardcore

Hi. Regarding your speedy tagging of this article. I think the context is clear and enough to identify the subject. So I feel the tag is inappropriate. Thanks. --Efe (talk) 07:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Bernie mac redirect

It didn't work anyway. in the history, while my edit was the most recent and said 24 bytes-redirected.... it didn't work. typing bernie mac into the box went to bernie mac as it appeared before the vandalism. Why? 192.156.234.170 (talk) 19:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

14th Dalai Lama

Dear Jmundo. The contents of 14th Dalai Lama#Foreign relations include number of incorrectness and deneutralize contents.

Wrong: Japan's government had been relatively quiet about the violence in Tibet

Correct: Japan's government declared the anxiety for "both side" violence in Tibet[1]

Wrong: out of deference to Beijing,

Correct: Japan's government is not under P.R.C.

Wrong: Tokyo does, however, grant visas to the spiritual leader, who has visited Japan fairly frequently.

Correct: Tokyo does, however, grant single Transit visas only for a "passenger" who will visit United States.

Also, The 14th Dalai Lama has close relationship between Shoko Asahara whom a cult guru in Japan. ja:ダライ・ラマ14世#日本の宗教との関係

I hope those contents must be correct up ASAP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.150.154.247 (talk) 05:20, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

nice get ;)

User talk:72.209.181.219 - destroy them vandals! BTW, if you want me to I can setup a talk page archive like mine... just say the word...--Cerejota (talk) 06:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

On it!--Cerejota (talk) 06:38, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

I think I am done. It is set to archive every 30 days, but I am not sure how it will work it now. Lets see. If something breaks just let me know and I can fix it.--Cerejota (talk) 07:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Latin Europe

Hey, I replied to your comment. Cheers 84.13.166.159 (talk) 20:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Puerto Rican Campaign

Jmundo, after studying the situation from every point of view, I have come to a conclusion in regard to the infox discussion which I believe may be a just one. Please check it out and express if you agree. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

LDS section

Hello J, thank you for your recent edits on the discussion page for the LDS article. Upon further review I see no need for any pictures. Given an article devoted to Prop 8 and the very limited manner in which the article addresses this topic, I see no need for a picture. However, I do appreciate your participation. Duke has a history, but I will let you experience first hand. Compromise is not a strong suit for him. I doubt he knows you so you would be a good neutral party to continue participating. My comments, even when we agree, will only goad him on if history serves. --^StormRider 20:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Re:My apologies?

I don't understand, you haven't done anything wrong. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

• You have done the right thing by translating the article. Too many people hide behind false truth's and what we have done is provide the real truth which has been omitted by baised historians for too long. I am not going to put up with that users nonsense anymore. I am just waiting to see if Caribbean HQ and Cerejota will express themselves once more to put the matter to an end. Tony the Marine (talk) 06:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

• I want to apologize for my actions during the Puerto Rico Campaign situation. My intentions were to act as mediator and instead I became frustrated with Durero. I would be totally unfair if I do not give credit to his valid observations. Even though we at times got off the main topic which was the contents of the inbox, I believe that the final addition (caption) to the infobox is justifable and will help clear any misunderstandings. By Durero pointing this out in the first place, I think we will be able to aviod future edit warring on this particular topic in the future. Gracias a todos, Tony the Marine (talk) 20:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Bandera

Gracias por avisarme. Ya me he puesto a ello. --Durero (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Menudo dropped by label

With Charlie Walk the former president of Epic Records fired, the Menudo (band) group has been officially dropped by the label. Walk who tried to reinvent the group failed. The two singles "Lost" and "More Than Words" had only meger record sales. Sony BMG took the failed Menudo attempt out on Walk and did not renew his contractNY Post Article and dropped Menudo from its label effective Dec 2008

The story is verified through the NY Post link and also the www.epicrecords.com site shows Menudo removed from the roster of Artist plus Billboard magazine announced it.

If you disagree lets talk before removing the sourced information or place it for a vote dispute.

I wish you well and thanks for reading.--66.229.250.178 (talk) 00:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

I am now under this account thanks.--APCEdits (talk) 01:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Puerto Rican citizenship

Wonderful and much needed article. I just wikified, but the last sentence "Certificates of Puerto Rican citizenship are issued ..." will need a citation. This is great because after it is done we wikilink to other articles and categories. What would be great is if we could upload images of the acts in question. Tony the Marine (talk) 01:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

• Just wanted to share with you the following: It is in the Section VII of Foraker Act of 1900 where the creation of a Puerto Rican citizenship for the residents of the island is stated. This citizenship was reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court in 1904 by its ruling in Gonzales v. Williams (Isabel Gonzalez one of my favorite people) which denied that Puerto Ricans were United States citizens and labeled them as noncitizen nationals. As I have always stated, the Jones Act of 1917, imposed United States citizenship upon the citizens of Puerto Rico, since the people of the island were not consulted nor asked if they wanted siad citizenship and the only reason that the U.S. implamented U.S. citizenship upon the people of Puerto Rico was to fill the military with manpowere upon the U.S. involovement in World War I. Puerto Rican citizenship was again reaffirmed on November 18, 1997, by the Puerto Rican Supreme Court through its ruling in Miriam J. Ramirez de Ferrer v. Juan Mari Bras. Mari Bras, however, through his renouncing of U.S. Citizenship, sought to redefine Section VII as a source of law that recognized a Puerto Rican nationality separate from that of the United States. Tony the Marine (talk) 01:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Pope John Paul II

A revert error from my side, thnx for fixing it. --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 16:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Smiles!

Cerejota (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

==Carlos Vélez Rieckehoff==‎

Ever hear of Carlos Vélez Rieckehoff? not too many people have, but he stated before the U.S. Congress that the very seizure of Puerto Rico through the Treaty of Paris of 1898 was null, since Puerto Rico had already been granted autonomy from Spain. He compared the invasion of Puerto Rico to the attempt of Russia to take over Finland in the 19th century. He pointed out that an international conference examining the issue had determined that "the rights of a country to national liberty is free from war conquests and diplomatic treaties." Interesting person. Tony the Marine (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

PR citizenship

Here is a note that User:Pr4ever left in my talk page which my interest you:

"Several observations about this interesting subject. I don't think that Ferrer vs Mari Bras is the definitive last word on this subject. Days before that opinion was published, then Gov. Rosselló signed into law a bill introduced by then Sen. MacClintock that reaffirmed the domiciliary nature, under the U.S. Constitution, of the Puerto Rican citizenship. Although lack of knowledge of a law does not excuse one from complying with it, the truth is that the justices did not really have any knowledge of that new law as their opinions were being released. Thus, there is no reference to a law, that may very well dispose of the issue, in the Court's opinions in Ferrer vs Mari Bras. Now, the bill's author is the new Secretary of State and, within a few weeks, the Court's 3-1 PDP majority will, for the first time in history, become a 3-out-of-7 minority! According to a radio news story I heard, MacClintock has continued issuing PR citizenship certificates, but has delegated signing them to his Deputy Secretary (very much in keeping with MacClintock's diplomatic way of dealing with issues---fulfilling his legal obligations without violating his personal convictions!). If a test case were filed to enjoin him from issuing future certificates, with his law and with PDP'ers about to be in the minority on the Court, who knows what will happen! Pr4ever (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)" Tony the Marine (talk) 05:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 5, Issue 6	8 February 2009	About the Signpost

News and notes: Elections, licensing update, and more	Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs"
Dispatches: April Fools 2009 mainpage	WikiProject Report: WikiProject Music
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Advina

Adivina quien esta jodiendo orta vez? Check out who is questioning the "GA" status of "Black history in Puerto Rico" in the talk page:Talk:Black history in Puerto Rico? Tony the Marine (talk) 04:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

I put a level 2 warning. His comment towards Carribbean HQ as "Propaganda HQ" etc are certainly a violation of all policies.--Cerejota (talk) 03:23, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009

From the editor — A new leaf

Commons Picture of the Year
Picture of the Year 2008 begins voting

News and notes
Flagged Revisions, historical image discovery, and more

In the news
Political tiff, error repeated in press, predictions of doom

Dispatches
How busy was 2008?

WikiProject report
WikiProject Gaelic games

Discussion report
Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations

Features and admins
Approved this week

Technology report
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Arbitration report
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 06:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for digging up those extra sources for Rare Disease Day. That helps a lot. If you have a moment, would you be able to help with adding the IntraMed source a bit to the second paragraph of the article (about the 2008 rare disease day), just because I don't read Spanish very well? rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 18:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Actually, never mind, I have just tried adding it. But could you double-check my translations (of the article title and of the relevant quotes) when you have time? Thanks again, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 18:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

{{helpme}} I just received this email: "Someone from the IP address 67.163.188.156 requested that we send you a new login password for the English Wikipedia." Should I worry about this? --J.Mundo (talk) 15:42, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

nah, nothing they can do with it, all password emails go to you, worst they can do is send it a few more times--Jac16888^Talk 15:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Bandera

Por cierto sobre esto, se me había pasado contestarte bien. La diferencia es que yo sí aporté referencias que demostraban que Puerto Rico era parte de España y que, por tanto, es innecesario incluirlo en el infobox. Y lo de incluir una bandera secesionista (porque en 1898 eso es lo que era) es realmente escandaloso. Tú, por contra, quisiste imponer una bandera sin referencias ni nada que apoyara tu tesis de que es la correcta. La que el Wikiproyecto ha decidido colocar "por consenso" ni siquiera es la que tú decías. Y, por cierto, sigues sin incluir referencias en la discusión del artículo y ya van a pasar dos semanas... Esperamos algo que indique cuál es el azul correcto. Saludos. --Durero (talk) 17:10, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Ah, ¿sí? Pues yo lo que leo en [2] es que la bandera que tú querías imponer (File:Flag of Puerto Rico (Light blue).svg) es "Light Blue: Preffered and widely used by pro- independence groups." Conclusión: ni aportaste ni has aportado referencias. Saludos. --Durero (talk) 17:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Ciertamente, me importa bien poco la bandera de Puerto Rico. Pero sí intento que la Wikipedia sea lo más correcta posible y no insulto a nadie. Por tanto no pienso rebajarme y dedicarte ningún insulto. En lo que sí estamos de acuerdo es en que no queremos discutir entre nosotros. Así que si no tienes nada útil que aportar (lo más probable). Me despido sin más. Saludos. --Durero (talk) 17:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

My dear, this is an etiquette violation; please, do not continue in this way or I will ask for a block for you. -- Netito⁷⁷⁷ 19:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh no, los bibliotecarios of the Spanish Wiki are here! This must be a bad joke. --J.Mundo (talk) 19:55, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

And I was blocked for callining a user muñequita over there, but I guess calling someone "my dear" isn´t "un abuso de confianza". De todos modos, yo le di el bienvenido, y espero que él no lleve las pendejadas de Wiki es. p´áca consigo. ¡Qué cara más dura! ¿No?Die4Dixie (talk) 21:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

La verdad es que espero que aprenda él un poco acerca de como edificar un proyecto colaborativo y que regrese a Wiki es. con un poco de perspectiva. Wiki es. podría hacer bien en imitar lo que tenemos por áca. En mi vida he visto bibliotecarios tan caprichosos. Parece que creen el proyecto español es su encomienda personal. Son unos déspotas y siempre echan mucha crema a sus tacos. Pues, mi oferta es sincera, y si hay algo en lo que le puedo ayudar, lo haré. Cuídate.Die4Dixie (talk) 22:21, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jmundo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked by user:drini without any warnings. The reason for the block was for using the Spanish term "joder". The term is used commonly by Puerto Rican, see my talk page. This is my first time using the term, I don't understand why I was block without no warnings. --J.Mundo (talk) 04:37, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See below. Clearly had warnings. Calling others names, and using abusive language, is clearly against the rules en inglés o en español. Also, you should read Our Talk Page Guidelines which clearly state "No matter to whom you address a comment, it is preferred that you use English on English Wikipedia talk pages. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large." Attempting to hide your personal attacks by using Spanish is poor form. Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, you were blocked for thr overall tone of your message, telling people to go away, stop fucking and acting as all mighty. You're not a newbie. You know you were crossing the line but thought that using spanish would get you off the sanction. -- m:drini 04:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikilawyering won't get you anywhere. Netito warned you and you instead made a sarcastic remark. You were warned and you dismissed the warning jokingly instead of retracting. Sanction applies. -- m:drini 04:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

I disagree, and ask you that you strike the claim of wikilawyering as uncivil, or you will be blocked for incivility. Netito and Duerero have been harassing Jmundo and WikiProject Puerto Rico, and people have a right to be exasperated. Maybe somethign is being lost in translation, but his remarks were not sarcastic, they were exasperated and powerless, because he had been pushed into a corner. --Cerejota (talk) 05:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you had a warning; then, you said me "do not fuck me" and then you said me "despot"... in spanish and in English it is an atack and you had a warning. -- Netito⁷⁷⁷ 04:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

I didn't use the term or communicate with the user after the first and only warning. I undid my last edit, so that doesn't count. By the way ask any Puerto Rican about the use of the term "joder": "In Cuba and Puerto Rico, the word is used in all of its meanings, but the terms of intercourse are the least used." 1. This in any way was a "legal threat, death threat, or issue of similar severity to result in a block without warnings. I don't see any warnings to Netito, after alll he called me "my dear" (doesn't seem like a formal warning either). --J.Mundo (talk) 05:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Netito, you are misrepresenting Jmundo: he said "stop fucking with me", not "do not fuck me". There is a clear difference: one is an exasperated expression, the other a personal attack. I think the admins should look at this. --Cerejota (talk) 05:48, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Furthermore, he didn't call you a despot, he called your behavior "despotic". And elaborated for a few sentences on what he considers "negative" interactions with you and durero, and then what he calls the "positive" values of collaboration. Far from a personal attack, it was a statement of support of our values as wikipedians. This whole thing smacks me of WP:GAME and missusing the language barrier to get away with a punitive block that doesn't benefit the community. --Cerejota (talk) 05:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

{{unblock|I'm accused of using Spanish when the other editor writes in Spanish, and was warned by other editor to "focus on the content, not the editors." 1. I still don't understand why I was not given a proper warnings when this editor and I where in heated debate and it was not a random profanity, but a sign of frustration. --J.Mundo (talk) 05:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC)}}

{{unblock|User was not given a proper warnings. A simple discussion should have taken care of what seems to be a vendetta from the Spanish project. Tony the Marine (talk) 14:10, 18 February 2009 (UTC)}}

I have received a request to unblock User: Jmundo. After viewing the situation I believe that there may have been an overreaction and that said block may have been unjustified over a simple issue which could have been solved in a simple discussion after the posting of a proper warning. I have therefore lifted the block with the intention that a civil dialogue can be carried out. Tony the Marine (talk) 14:10, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

{{help}} My request for unblock was granted, but I can't edit, because my IP is autoblocked. Thanks, --J.Mundo (talk) 15:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Just follow the instructions at {{Autoblock}}, and you should be good. NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 15:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Heh, blocked for using "joder", how utterly ridiculous, cultures clash without a doubt. ¡Hay que joderse! Por cierto, Durero, si te importa tan poco la bandera de Puerto Rico, deja al tema morir de una vez. Si no te gusta buscar un consenso con otros usuarios, mantente editando paginas que solo discutan a España. Mientras tanto, respeta las culturas ajenas y a sus banderas. Porque si de hablar mal se trata, de la "Madre Patria" hay mucha tela que cortar. - Caribbean~H.Q. 19:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Rare Disease Day

rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you for taking the time to dig up so many sources at the Rare Disease Day AfD. Your efforts are very helpful, and I will try to incorporate as many of the references as I can into the article soon. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 15:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

no hay por que agradecer...

Be more patient, you are not alone... bullies have to be faced upfront. HAPPY EDITING!--Cerejota (talk) 19:18, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

[[3]] you are invite to comment here.Die4Dixie (talk) 21:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)