User talk:Otolemur crassicaudatus

Recent attacks

I wonder why did you ignore the situation in Orissa in the article. --Avinesh Jose (talk) 07:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

I did not ignored it, I missed it. This fact will mentioned.Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 07:21, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Many unnecessary edit war happening on the article as you can see in the history, which makes hesitant users. Anyhow, you just carryon, let me join shortly. And one more thing that if you could alter the search keywords in google for more supportive news links. Thanks. --Avinesh Jose (talk) 08:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

RE:Wikipedia:WikiProject New page

Sounds like a great idea, and i would be willing to help out with what ever needs to be done. But, be careful about spamming users talk pages as you may find yourself in a bit of trouble. Cheers! Tiptoety ^talk 08:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Bardeep2

Just a quickie note - It is up to the user what goes on their page. If they add an insult, just blank it. Infuriating as this editor is, it is their right. However, I suspect it won't be long before he gets himself blosked, not if he carries on the way he is vandalising our pages. Cheers for correcting his edits, BTW :-) StephenBuxton (talk) 18:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

your r everts of TestDriver's work on the supercheats page

OK i am meaning no disrespect to your job and what you do . but . the user known as TestDriver was just improving the vocab and grammar of said page and was not i repeat was not vandilising the page . i personally asked him in said site to help us with this article by improving first the grammar . and also help us get independent resources and to help it comply with the standards. the reason i did this is because i fail to have the grammar capabilities do do said task .

respectfully

Neptis (talk) 19:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

CPM

It is probably best to ignore the anon IP for the time being. They cannot do anything to the article while it is semi-protected and it appears they are not willing to engage in a civil and reasonable debate. As such, the best policy is probably to ignore them until they have calmed down.--Conjoiner (talk) 15:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Excuse me

Hello, I'm Humpty Dumpty secretary. Would you tell me WHy did you remove my edit on Tamil Eelam? I edited only (+ja)link. What's my mistake?--Humpty Dumpty secretary (talk) 10:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

• Sorry, I'm speaking english so litte. Your question, why I think correct for my edit? or You say, I need explain my edit in edit summmary? I wrote +ja, so Is it inadequateness? why do you think vandalism my edit?--Humpty Dumpty secretary (talk) 11:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• Ok, thanks a lot. actually, there are same case on my meta wiki edited. Will the my name be bad?（－ω－；）you know, my skill is low level so I didn't mean more edit briefly. only link. It was relieve, becouse no my mistake.Do you mind if I remove your edit on Tamil Eelam?--Humpty Dumpty secretary (talk) 12:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• (report) I revised and explain in edit summmary. It's solve so User:Humpty Dumpty secretary(talk) revised revision of User:Otolemur crassicaudatus(talk) again. Thank you for everything.--Humpty Dumpty secretary (talk) 16:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Please review Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunscoill Gaelgagh

Hello, please review the AFD for Bunscoill Gaelgagh. It seems likely that you may change your mind on your !vote. Thanks, JERRY ^talk _contribs 01:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

User talk:SHOUT357437943

Hi there - just to let you know I reverted your vand4 warning to the above user. They've only vandalised twice, and I've given them vand2 and vand3 respectively. Any further vandalism would warrant a vand4, but I don't think it's warranted just yet. Thanks! Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 15:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

ANI

[1]. Care to comment?Ghanadar galpa (talk) 12:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

or here [2] Ghanadar galpa (talk) 12:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

A new user appears out of thin air

There is a new guy, [3] who has appeared and joined User:Soman and User:Conjoiner in blanking text on CPI(M) critical of them. A well-coordinated team of three CPI(M) edit-cabal will game the WP:3RR system and Disrupt wikipedia to make a point. I will keep out of the talk page for a day or so to calm down. However, I suspect that the Communists will not.Ghanadar galpa (talk) 15:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)