Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinnok's amulet: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Shinnok's amulet: delete |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:*Can you offer a single solitary [[WP:RS|reliable source]] that establishes the verifiable notability of this fictional item separate from the game? One? Even a tiny one? No? Then why are you wrongly insisting yet again that because the article looks good it satisfies the objections raised in the nomination? Does substance actually mean anything to you at all? Or do you just look at the pretty pictures and the lovely blocks of text when you make your decision? [[User:Otto4711|Otto4711]] 21:37, 22 October 2007 (UTC) |
:*Can you offer a single solitary [[WP:RS|reliable source]] that establishes the verifiable notability of this fictional item separate from the game? One? Even a tiny one? No? Then why are you wrongly insisting yet again that because the article looks good it satisfies the objections raised in the nomination? Does substance actually mean anything to you at all? Or do you just look at the pretty pictures and the lovely blocks of text when you make your decision? [[User:Otto4711|Otto4711]] 21:37, 22 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
:*And another thing...do you have any grasp of the difference betwwen ''asserting'' notability and actually being notable? Simply asserting notability gets an article past ''speedy'' deletion. The topic must then ''live up'' to that assertion of notability through sourcing. "It asserts notability" is ''irrelevant'' to an AFD. [[User:Otto4711|Otto4711]] 21:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC) |
:*And another thing...do you have any grasp of the difference betwwen ''asserting'' notability and actually being notable? Simply asserting notability gets an article past ''speedy'' deletion. The topic must then ''live up'' to that assertion of notability through sourcing. "It asserts notability" is ''irrelevant'' to an AFD. [[User:Otto4711|Otto4711]] 21:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per nomination. Being part of something notable, doesn't make the subject automatically notable. [[User:RobJ1981|RobJ1981]] 22:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:26, 22 October 2007
AfDs for this article:
- Shinnok's amulet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Delete - fails WP:N, WP:FICT, WP:PLOT. An in-universe description of the game plot that revolves around the amulet. No reliable sources attest to the real-world notability of this fictional item. Otto4711 15:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep: Major plot element of one of the all-time most successful video game series and the nice-looking article asserts notability by indicating its context in multiple games from this wildly popular series. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 16:29, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Can you offer a single solitary reliable source that establishes the verifiable notability of this fictional item separate from the game? One? Even a tiny one? No? Then why are you wrongly insisting yet again that because the article looks good it satisfies the objections raised in the nomination? Does substance actually mean anything to you at all? Or do you just look at the pretty pictures and the lovely blocks of text when you make your decision? Otto4711 21:37, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- And another thing...do you have any grasp of the difference betwwen asserting notability and actually being notable? Simply asserting notability gets an article past speedy deletion. The topic must then live up to that assertion of notability through sourcing. "It asserts notability" is irrelevant to an AFD. Otto4711 21:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Being part of something notable, doesn't make the subject automatically notable. RobJ1981 22:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)