User talk:New England: Difference between revisions
→Block: comment |
what world do you two live in? |
||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
::It seems that I have to go offline, and Oldwindybear will be posting to [[WP:ANI|ANI]] about this. Regardless, I still find this block to be totally inappropriate, and unless damning evidence to the contrary exists, my view is stationary at the above. 'Night, '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 10:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC) |
::It seems that I have to go offline, and Oldwindybear will be posting to [[WP:ANI|ANI]] about this. Regardless, I still find this block to be totally inappropriate, and unless damning evidence to the contrary exists, my view is stationary at the above. 'Night, '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 10:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
:I agree completely with Daniel. I have watchlisted this page, so I'm likely to see any unblock request that comes along. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 10:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC) |
:I agree completely with Daniel. I have watchlisted this page, so I'm likely to see any unblock request that comes along. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 10:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::[[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]It appears that you both endorse open lying. This person lies openly about who nomianted the bear - I did - and then claims he nominated TomStar for nominating him, when I nominated him, and you endorse that? Wikipedia is pitiful if you two are examples of admins. No wonder I nominated the bear! I find your attitude pitiful. You allow open lying - there is no dispute about this, I nominated the man, this user claims someone else did, despite knowing that to be a lie, and then claims the bear nominated him as a payback, and you find all that just fine. The bear's only fault is he tries to be too reasonable. I think this person should be blocked for life. You will probably block me for telling the truth, while endorsing this user lying throughout wikipedia. [[User:Stillstudying|Stillstudying]] 11:30, 16 July 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:30, 16 July 2007
This is New England's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
My RfB
Thank you, Black Harry, for participating in my RfB, which ended unsuccessfully with a final tally of (80/22/3). |
By the way, I truly hope that you change your mind and return. Don't let disagreements bring you down, we all have them on Wikipedia. :-) Best regards, Húsönd 21:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thanks in part to your support, I am Wikipedia's newest bureaucrat. I will do my best to live up to your confidence and kind words. Andre (talk) 09:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC) P.S. I hope you reconsider and come back to the project. If not, good luck in your endeavors.
Welcome back!
Welcome back, BH! I'm glad that you decide to return!! Клоун 14:06, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm glad too; welcome back! Acalamari 23:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Block
I have blocked you for one week for the comments you made about me on TomStar's nomination talk page. You accused me of nominating him for having nominated me. That was provably false. He did not nominate me, Stillstudying did, and he formatted the nomination. Further, the links you placed showed that I never said, as you claimed, that I nominted him in return for nominating me. I blocked you for 24 hours, and lifted it after teling you I would block you again if you continued false statements. I warned you that continued false statements would result in another blocking, and you made additional false statements last night on the RfA talk page. I have blocked you for one week for making false accusations. I will not lift it. Perhaps someone else will, but I would hope they would make a stand for our policies on false accusations and wikipedia assume good faith which you have grossly violated. old windy bear 09:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- I will unblock you immediately if you wish me to, New England. It is totally inappropriate for an administrator to block someone they are clearly in a dispute with. The fact about whether you were even lying is in dispute, and for the person who is accusing you to act as prosecution, judge and executioner (proverbially) is utterly ridiculous. Daniel 10:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- It seems that I have to go offline, and Oldwindybear will be posting to ANI about this. Regardless, I still find this block to be totally inappropriate, and unless damning evidence to the contrary exists, my view is stationary at the above. 'Night, Daniel 10:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- I agree completely with Daniel. I have watchlisted this page, so I'm likely to see any unblock request that comes along. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 10:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Heimstern Läufer DanielIt appears that you both endorse open lying. This person lies openly about who nomianted the bear - I did - and then claims he nominated TomStar for nominating him, when I nominated him, and you endorse that? Wikipedia is pitiful if you two are examples of admins. No wonder I nominated the bear! I find your attitude pitiful. You allow open lying - there is no dispute about this, I nominated the man, this user claims someone else did, despite knowing that to be a lie, and then claims the bear nominated him as a payback, and you find all that just fine. The bear's only fault is he tries to be too reasonable. I think this person should be blocked for life. You will probably block me for telling the truth, while endorsing this user lying throughout wikipedia. Stillstudying 11:30, 16 July 2007 (UTC)