User talk:Hazar Sam

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Materialscientist,

Sorry for my late reply; I haven’t reviewed messages for a while.

Which citation are you referring to?

I wish you a peaceful and joyful day filled with warmth. Happy Christmas Eve. Hazar HS (talk) 11:38, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Psychloppos (talk) 09:31, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi Psychloppos, thank you for your message. I understand the importance of ensuring neutrality and transparency in editing Wikipedia pages. While I have made edits to improve the neutrality and sourcing of the article.

To maintain fairness and accuracy, I believe it is necessary for a third party to review the page before any further edits are made.

Concerning the Movement for a Pluralistic society, you should discuss it with the individual or group who created it for further clarification.

If there are specific concerns about my edits, I am happy to address them, and i welcome an indépendant review by an administrator to ensure the article meets Wikipedia’s guidelines.

Happy Christmas Eve to you. Wishing you a peaceful and joyful day. Hazar HS (talk) 11:33, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Good. Not commenting in the future that I am "fuelled by an unhealthy obsession" would also be in keeping with the Christmas spirit. Psychloppos (talk) 12:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hazar Sam. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Accusing another editor of engaging in defamatory edits is a violation of WP:LEGAL and can result in your being blocked. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 18:06, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

I appreciate your message, but you should read what he wrote and consider the aggressive way he behaved. I am not attacking anyone, but honestly, I am tired of the rules. It seems that a simple user’s comment is considered a violation, yet the same standards are not applied to admins or extended users. In reality, Wikipedia is losing its credibility and has become a platform dominated by small groups who seek to impose their ideas and points of view on others. I understand why newspapers and websites criticise Wikipedia. Best regards HS (talk) 18:27, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

It doesn't matter if you don't like the rules, you have to follow them. The standards are being applied to others, you're simply upset you aren't getting your way. And the whole "Wikipedia is losing its credibility" line has been spouted for decades, it's no more true now than it was in 2006. Sour grapes. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 19:06, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

If blocking me makes you happy, then by all means, crack on—I’ve no desire left to contribute. I won’t bite my tongue just to win your approval and keep engaging on a platform that’s rapidly losing its credibility.

Adiós, and may your block button never fail you!

Huzzah 2A02:C7C:AAE0:5600:F103:4C0:2321:C7AC (talk) 21:24, 26 December 2024 (UTC)