Jump to content

User talk:Ze972: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Zirid dynasty.
Warning: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Battle of Sagrajas.
Line 8: Line 8:


[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not add or change content, as you did at [[:Zirid dynasty]], without citing a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]]. Please review the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 20:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not add or change content, as you did at [[:Zirid dynasty]], without citing a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]]. Please review the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 20:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to add [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|unsourced or poorly sourced]] content, as you did at [[:Battle of Sagrajas]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 --> [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 20:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:41, 28 August 2022

Original research and unsourced material

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Rustamid dynasty, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. This applies also to information communicated through images, such as flags or maps presenting historical information. R Prazeres (talk) 18:01, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ze972, you have just tried to re-insert your original research at the Rustamid dynasty page after it was already reverted. If you do this again your account may be reported for edit-warring (see WP:EDITWAR for what this means) and you may be blocked from further editing. Instead of repeating the same edits after they've been reverted, you may discuss your proposed edits at the article's talk page. R Prazeres (talk) 20:19, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You have yet again added unsourced original research at Hammadid dynasty, despite an earlier warning about this behaviour on another article. This constitutes disruptive editing. Once again, if you continue to add or re-add your own original research to articles you may be reported to the administrators' noticeboard. R Prazeres (talk) 21:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Zirid dynasty, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 20:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Battle of Sagrajas, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 20:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]