Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shotokan Karate Union: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:53, 8 April 2015

Shotokan Karate Union

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This organization exists, but I see nothing to show it's notable. The sources appear to be either event results or not independent, but I'll admit I couldn't find many of them. However, the burden of proof is on those creating the article to show there's significant independent coverage.Mdtemp (talk) 15:05, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Quite a bit of notability discussion on the article's Talk page. My comment there was that it is hard to tell whether this is anything more than a UK centered small grouping.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:44, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep notable organization based in the United Kingdom. Passes GNG. CrazyAces489 (talk) 21:52, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any supporting evidence or is this just another of your votes to keep all martial arts articles? Papaursa (talk) 17:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I voted to delete Kimbo Slice, so how is that a keep to all martial arts articles? You seem to not like me. Lets try to keep things civil. CrazyAces489 (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. They unquestionably exist and they have tournaments. Neither of those make them notable. I'm not seeing the evidence of significant third party coverage. Niteshift36 (talk) 22:28, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep agree with CrazyAces489 observations in addition they have affiliated members in other countries http://wckf.org/ http://wckf.org/members.php Bazatom (talk) 09:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)— Bazatom (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

What do the links do the World Christian Karate Federation have to do with this discussion? Papaursa (talk) 17:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like i walked between a personal grudge fight so not wishing to get involved in that but i agree with crazyace489 again, when he says "lets try to keep things civil." Although i thought the answer to the question was self evident, nevertheless the answer is, nothing other than the WCKF are members of the SKU http://wckf.org/ and the second link supplied http://wckf.org/members.php shows the spread of countries that are represented as members Bazatom (talk) 19:53, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Delete'''. They unquestionably exist and they have tournaments. Neither of those make them notable. I'm not seeing the evidence of ''significant'' third party coverage. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 22:28, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 ::'''keep''' agree with CrazyAces489 observations in addition they have affiliated members in other countries  http://wckf.org/   http://wckf.org/members.php  [[User:Bazatom|Bazatom]] ([[User talk:Bazatom|talk]]) 09:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)<small>— [[User:Bazatom|Bazatom]] ([[User talk:Bazatom|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bazatom|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small>
-::What do the links do the World Christian Karate Federation have to do with this discussion? [[User:Papaursa|Papaursa]] ([[User talk:Papaursa|talk]]) 17:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
+::What do the links do the World Christian Karate Federation have to do with this discussion? [[User:Papaursa|Papaursa]] ([[User talk:Papaursa|talk]]) 17:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)<br />
+Sounds like i walked between a personal grudge fight so not wishing to get involved in that but i agree with crazyace489 again, when he says "lets try to keep things civil."  Although i thought the answer to the question was self evident, nevertheless the answer is, nothing other than the WCKF are members of the SKU http://wckf.org/ and the second link supplied http://wckf.org/members.php shows the spread of countries that are represented as members [[User:Bazatom|Bazatom]] ([[User talk:Bazatom|talk]]) 19:53, 8 April 2015 (UTC)