User talk:6k7de3x4v

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Shenzhen. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. HXL's Roundtable, and Record 23:08, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Shenzhen

Go to Talk:Shenzhen and discuss your reasoning for removal of Deng and See Also. In the meantime, I have reverted back to the stable version, i.e. before any reverting regarding the two was done. --HXL's Roundtable, and Record 23:52, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Listing of Deng is for the safety of certain ethnic groups. Also Shenzhen is NOT the place to advertise other SEZ.

I asked you to go to that page, not here. And what ethnic issues? What safety? And how are we advertising other SEZs? The article only mentions the group of SEZs, not all of them. In my mind, if X is part of a larger and significant group Y, then Y should be mentioned. --HXL's Roundtable, and Record 00:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Again, it is NOT recommended to mention Deng as his name will be associated with certain ethnic group. Other SEZ do not do for Shenzhen, just because Shenzhen is a success, do not take the success work of Shenzhen and link to other SEZ and other COUNTRIES. If other SEZ want to be successful, this is not the place. Shenzhen is Shenzhen.

How will his name be associated with Hakkas or Han? There is/was no mention of him being a Hakka or Han anywhere in this article. I can make no sense out of your SEZ argument. There are no countries linked there. For a guide on "See also" sections, see this. --HXL's Roundtable, and Record 00:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Again, it is the safety of Hakka people. Even though mentioning Deng in opening up Shenzhen is positive, you forgot the negative side. Are you familiar with ethnic issues and are you Hakka?

(6k7de3x4v (talk) 00:20, 18 January 2011 (UTC))

what safety? what is the negative side? Urban problems? He still was the opener of SZ, regardless of the effects, so you still have not addressed the question. and no, I am not Hakka. --HXL's Roundtable, and Record 00:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

You cannot associate Deng publicly with Shenzhen as this will cause ethnic issues. Are you Chinese or foreigner?(6k7de3x4v (talk) 00:30, 18 January 2011 (UTC))

Explain how it will cause ethnic issues. I am from Luoyang, and I would have known about this if my parents did. --HXL's Roundtable, and Record 00:34, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

I believe that you are in Luoyang which only has your ethnic group so you will not understand. I believe that you are a young person with no real life experience.(6k7de3x4v (talk) 00:38, 18 January 2011 (UTC))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Shenzhen, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. nn123645 (talk) 01:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Shenzhen constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 01:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

3RR

Please note that Wikipedia has a rule that requires that people do not Edit war--that is, you may not just continually revert the changes of others. While edit warring in general is forbidden, there is a very strict, specific rule called WP:3RR that says that you may not revert the work of other editors more than 3 times in a single 24 hour period. You have already passed that on Shenzhen. Since you are a new user and presumably don't know this rule, I will issue you this warning. Note that if you make any more reverts on that article today, you will be reported and your account will be blocked. What you need to do now is go to the article's talk page and discuss the change you want. I can tell you, though, that you may not remove the See Also section--this is not about transferring the success of one city to another. See Also's are fundamental sections of most longer Wikipedia articles, because they help people navigate through related topics. But, again, most importantly, stop edit-warring immediately. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)