User talk:YumeChaser

Singles vs EPs

I know you follow WP:NSONGS for premature singles, but I thought it was strange to treat some of them as songs, as they are more like albums (or at least EP's) than songs. In fact, iTunes often treats them as EPs. Take the Sunrise/Sunset single by Hamasaki. It's clearly not just a song. Anyways, I took it to the discussion page of WP:NSONGS, and I figured you'd want to put in your input. Also, I salute you for your diligence with keeping these pages. We're lucky to have you. Glaexeaus (talk) 15:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

A "song" per Wikipedia Music is a non-single or a B-side, see here I don't know why but it is. It doesn't matter what iTunes treat it as because iTunes treats mostly everything with more than one song as an EP. We can't treat them as an album or an EP because they weren't released as such. If the artist releases it as an EP or an album, then and only then and we say "okay the page can stay since the released date and track list has been confirmed". Another issue with the page is the lack of sources the page can't stay as a stand alone with one source saying it exists. Yes, "Sunrise/Sunset" is a single and people call songs singles. Which is mostly likely why they have it under WP:NSONGS. MS (Talk|Contributions) 16:45, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Brexx

Hey!

Sorry about not replying yesterday, I went off-line for the day just a few minutes before you sent me that message.

Anyways, I concur with Nishkid, that was a nice catch. I'm usually pretty good at picking out Brexx socks from a mile away so feel free to ask for a second opinion if you come across any more.

Thanks! Big Bird (talk • contribs) 12:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Yuna Ito

Where is the source about Yuna Ito = Korean ??? --Kookyunii (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me that it needed a source. Now it is sourced from a reliable source, I should add. MS (Talk|Contributions) 18:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Don't Dare to Warn me discourteously before you find the detailed reason of the situation. Observe the proprieties. Your words and actions often made me displeased. -- Kookyunii (talk) 19:03, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

It's actually a KNOWN fact that she is Korean, so a source IS not needed. A quick Google check would have told you that a it would have came from a reliable source too. But after someone else removed the categories that I got the source. I haven't said anything negative to you before and I don't plan on starting. As for my actions, I am just following the rules. So sorry if they displease you. MS (Talk|Contributions) 19:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

She Wolf

In that case, I'll remove the template. Admc2006 (talk) 05:07, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Nami Tamaki - Negai Boshi

Okay, sometimes the name of the song isn't completely in the chorus, and sometimes it is. I don't understand why you're saying it's Negai Hoshi. There have been other songs with the same kanji, and it's been Negai Boshi. Hoshi is never used, please be more precise at least, 'cause it makes more sense to just call it Negai Boshi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuubari (talk • contribs) 06:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

I have reported you for violation the three revert rule. I asked you to discuss the problem not once but twice. You should have done so after I asked you the first time. Now onto Negai H/Boshi, if you knew a bit of Japanese you'd the kanji 星 means Hoshi and not Bōshi (某氏). Anyway, I'm going to redirect the page to Friends! seeing how the article fails both WP:NSONGS and WP:N. Have fun editing and don't leave a reply here, it makes no sense since I have already reported you. Also, I'll just remove it since you didn't want to talk it out when I asked you to. MS (Talk|Contributions) 06:42, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Last Friends

An article isn't supposed to be in both Category:Japanese television dramas and Category:Drama television series at the same time; the Japanese category is already a subcategory of the general one. Unfortunately, HotCat doesn't offer the ability to explain why a category is being added or removed. Bearcat (talk) 06:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of honorific titles in popular music (2nd nomination)

As one of the largest contributor to this article, I wanted to let you know that the article is currently up for deletion. Ikip (talk) 19:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

TVXQ

Can you give me a good reason why I can't add the Guinness World Records part on the TVXQ article besides saying that it's trivial? It's pretty noticeable to be listed in the book. Even the world's tallest man has an article on Wikipedia because of that. Someone963852 (talk) 00:45, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

I didn't say that it was just trivial read the edit summary again, I believe there was more than just "Remove for being trivial". Having the most number-one singles for a foreign artist in Japan is an achievement, having the largest fanclub and the most pictures taken are not. The record holds no importance whatsoever. So what they got the largest fanclub and the most pictures taken. What importance does that have to the article? None, all of that is basically a fun fact. And I don't see you are bringing up the world's tallest man here, because TVXQ's article doesn't exist because of the Guinness World Record. MS (Talk|Contributions) 01:02, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, it doesn't matter how many pictures they have taken or how big their fan club is, but being in the Guinness World Records is definitely a big accomplishment. As for the tallest man thing, that was just an example of how an average person would become well known because of their record. A few even have their own article on Wikipedia, even though it's just a few sentences short and that Wikipedia is not a record book.. ([1][2]) I'll leave it for now to avoid edit-warring but I'm still not impressed or even persuaded one bit by your response. Someone963852 (talk) 01:13, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Look who's talking.

You already broke the 3-revert-rule on TVXQ by reverting my edit. You're just lucky no one reported you yet. [3][4][5]Someone963852 (talk) 22:59, 15 August 2009 (UTC) I didn't revert your edit I removed it. THEN I reverted your edits. MS (Talk|Contributions) 00:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:BonesS1.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BonesS1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 10:59, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Touch Me!

On August 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Touch Me!, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

OK

Would U like to participate in the That's Where You Take Me deletion nomination Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/That's_Where_You_Take_Me_(2nd_nomination) ?? --PlatinumFire 20:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism accusations

MS, I don't disagree that you can delete comments from your talk page; I was, however, treating your edit summary as a response, and responding to it.

With regard to deleting entries rom your talk page, please note WP:TALK, "The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user." TJRC (talk) 00:19, 25 September 2009 (UTC)