User talk:Jaydoggmarco: Difference between revisions
→Jaydoggmarco, you are invited to the Teahouse!: new section |
→Edit warring at Kiki Camarena: new section |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation]]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> |
[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation]]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> |
||
== Edit warring at [[Kiki Camarena]] == |
|||
Hi [[User:Jaydoggmarco|Jaydoggmarco]], you need to find reliable sources (see here: [[WP:RS]]) to support and justify your edits to articles, including at [[Kiki Camarena]]. Otherwise, it's impossible for readers or editors to verify (see [[WP:V]]) what you say. ''[[El Pais]]'' is the largest and most respected newspaper in Spain, and it's not appropriate to remove material sourced to it unless you have a strong argument and contrary sources to bolster your claim. If you look at [[Talk:Kiki Camarena]] you will also see that I've provided a number of high-quality academic sources that go much further than ''El Pais''. |
|||
Similarly, if you want to describe the involvement of the CIA as a "fringe" theory, you need to explain what you mean and to provide sources justifying the assertion. |
|||
Lastly, you have already reverted the article twice. If you do so once more you will have crossed what is called the "bright line" in edit-warring (see [[WP:3RR]]. That means that you could be blocked for some time. Please do not do that. Instead I would hope that you make comments at [[Talk:Kiki Camarena]] and provide links to and quotes from reliable sources to support your arguments. Thanks, -[[User:Darouet|Darouet]] ([[User talk:Darouet|talk]]) 03:41, 31 January 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:41, 31 January 2019
Jaydoggmarco, you are invited to the Teahouse!
![]() |
Hi Jaydoggmarco! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 20 December 2018 (UTC) |
Edit warring at Kiki Camarena
Hi Jaydoggmarco, you need to find reliable sources (see here: WP:RS) to support and justify your edits to articles, including at Kiki Camarena. Otherwise, it's impossible for readers or editors to verify (see WP:V) what you say. El Pais is the largest and most respected newspaper in Spain, and it's not appropriate to remove material sourced to it unless you have a strong argument and contrary sources to bolster your claim. If you look at Talk:Kiki Camarena you will also see that I've provided a number of high-quality academic sources that go much further than El Pais.
Similarly, if you want to describe the involvement of the CIA as a "fringe" theory, you need to explain what you mean and to provide sources justifying the assertion.
Lastly, you have already reverted the article twice. If you do so once more you will have crossed what is called the "bright line" in edit-warring (see WP:3RR. That means that you could be blocked for some time. Please do not do that. Instead I would hope that you make comments at Talk:Kiki Camarena and provide links to and quotes from reliable sources to support your arguments. Thanks, -Darouet (talk) 03:41, 31 January 2019 (UTC)