Jump to content

User talk:Jone Rohne Nester: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Fuhghettaboutit (talk | contribs)
Warning: Adding unreferenced controversial information about living persons. (TW)
Line 17: Line 17:
:Hi {{ping|Fuhghettaboutit}}, thanks for your message and feedback! In my opinion this article failed W policies on multiple levels but I chose G11 , probably not the best option. Anyways, as far as I can see I am not the only one who proposed this article for deletion. But once again thanks for your feedback! [[User:Jone Rohne Nester|Jone Rohne Nester]] ([[User talk:Jone Rohne Nester#top|talk]]) 10:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
:Hi {{ping|Fuhghettaboutit}}, thanks for your message and feedback! In my opinion this article failed W policies on multiple levels but I chose G11 , probably not the best option. Anyways, as far as I can see I am not the only one who proposed this article for deletion. But once again thanks for your feedback! [[User:Jone Rohne Nester|Jone Rohne Nester]] ([[User talk:Jone Rohne Nester#top|talk]]) 10:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
::Hi Again. That's not the issue. There are different deletion processes for different content. This was not subject to G11. Period. That does not mean it should not be deleted but through the proper process. There are pages that do not meet any speedy deletion criteria, so they must be prodded or taken to [[WP:AFD|AfD]]. There are also pages that meet none and also cannot be prodded but can only be taken to AfD or another [[WP:XFD|discussion process]], depending on what page is involved. You have to learn the processes and what is within and without their ambits to known which to use for what. For the speedy deletion criteria, the parameters are highly refined and generally strictly construed. Best regards--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] ([[User talk:Fuhghettaboutit|talk]]) 14:28, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
::Hi Again. That's not the issue. There are different deletion processes for different content. This was not subject to G11. Period. That does not mean it should not be deleted but through the proper process. There are pages that do not meet any speedy deletion criteria, so they must be prodded or taken to [[WP:AFD|AfD]]. There are also pages that meet none and also cannot be prodded but can only be taken to AfD or another [[WP:XFD|discussion process]], depending on what page is involved. You have to learn the processes and what is within and without their ambits to known which to use for what. For the speedy deletion criteria, the parameters are highly refined and generally strictly construed. Best regards--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] ([[User talk:Fuhghettaboutit|talk]]) 14:28, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

== June 2017 ==
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop adding unreferenced or [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|poorly referenced]] biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as [[Wikipedia:Libel|defamatory]] and is in violation of [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|Wikipedia policy]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. ''At two AfDs, you have stated that individuals who have been good enough to play first-class cricket are [[WP:MILL]]. I would point out to you that WP operates a strict [[WP:BLP]] policy and you must not make assertions of that nature to denigrate a person's prowess. ''<!-- Template:uw-biog3 --> <b>[[User:BlackJack|Jack]] &#124; <sup><i>[[User talk:BlackJack|talk page]]</i></sup></b> 15:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:38, 12 June 2017

Hi Jone. Sorry i did not do it intentionally as am new to wikipedia and was trying to figure things out. I have taken your feedback and will learn more about some guidelines. I have also made significant changes to the article. Please review the same. Appreciate your feedback. Apologies for my behaviour. User: DG999 — Preceding unsigned comment added by DG999 (talkcontribs) 11:49, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have changed your CSD for Honeywell group into a redirect to Honeywell. "Honeywell group" could be a search term people use, so it's good to have that redirect and discourage additional articles being created. Regards pseudonym June 10, 2017 talk 11:58, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello talk, Thanks a lot. I am aware of the existence of an Honeywell article. But the Honeywell Group I am trying to create is a different one. In fact, it is a group registered in Nigeria. It is only a co-incidence that there is an Honeywell in the USA. Please advice.

@SurajRokafela:Ah, good point. I have moved this to Draft:Honeywell Group, where you are welcome to edit the page. I have removed most of the previous contents as I noticed it had been taken from existing sources, which is a violation of Wikipedia's guidelines on copyright infringement. I invite you to create an article in your own words about the company, but please ensure that all claims are cites with verifable third party references that can establish notability of the firm. If you have any questions, please let me know on my personal talk page. I am happy to review the page when done and help move to main article space. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 13:17, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jake Brockman: Thanks a lot. I will keep you posted.

Declined speedy deletion nomination of My Daddy My Heart

Hello Jone Rohne Nester. Speedy deletion work is important and I do appreciate the effort. I would just ask that you please review the criteria carefully because accuracy is also important. On that issue, I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of My Daddy My Heart as constituting unambiguous advertising or promotion under CSD G11. That criterion did not apply because the page did not contain any promotional text I could see, much less being "exclusively promotional", and that would need to be "fundamentally rewritten" to become encyclopedic.Template:Z158--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:01, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Fuhghettaboutit:, thanks for your message and feedback! In my opinion this article failed W policies on multiple levels but I chose G11 , probably not the best option. Anyways, as far as I can see I am not the only one who proposed this article for deletion. But once again thanks for your feedback! Jone Rohne Nester (talk) 10:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Again. That's not the issue. There are different deletion processes for different content. This was not subject to G11. Period. That does not mean it should not be deleted but through the proper process. There are pages that do not meet any speedy deletion criteria, so they must be prodded or taken to AfD. There are also pages that meet none and also cannot be prodded but can only be taken to AfD or another discussion process, depending on what page is involved. You have to learn the processes and what is within and without their ambits to known which to use for what. For the speedy deletion criteria, the parameters are highly refined and generally strictly construed. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:28, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. At two AfDs, you have stated that individuals who have been good enough to play first-class cricket are WP:MILL. I would point out to you that WP operates a strict WP:BLP policy and you must not make assertions of that nature to denigrate a person's prowess. Jack | talk page 15:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]