Jump to content

User talk:Johnpacklambert: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Please stop.: delete rubbish
Recent AFDs: new section
Line 131: Line 131:
==WP:NFOOTBALL==
==WP:NFOOTBALL==
Hi Johnpacklambert, regarding [[WP:FOOTBALL]] and these two recent article you have nominated for deletion ([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maksim Agapov|1]] & [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahidul Alam (footballer)|2]]) players who have appeared in an official international match are considered notable per [[WP:NFOOTY]]. Thanks [[User:Inter&anthro|Inter&anthro]] ([[User talk:Inter&anthro|talk]]) 13:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi Johnpacklambert, regarding [[WP:FOOTBALL]] and these two recent article you have nominated for deletion ([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maksim Agapov|1]] & [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahidul Alam (footballer)|2]]) players who have appeared in an official international match are considered notable per [[WP:NFOOTY]]. Thanks [[User:Inter&anthro|Inter&anthro]] ([[User talk:Inter&anthro|talk]]) 13:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

== Recent AFDs ==

Could you please respond to the questions that have arisen on you talk page and in several recent Football AFDs, rather than just blanking the discussion? [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 21:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:01, 27 February 2017

The old part of my talk page was moved to User talk:Johnpacklambert/Archive 1 , User talk:Johnpacklambert/Archive 2, User talk:Johnpacklambert/Archive 3, User talk:Johnpacklambert/Archive 4, User talk:Johnpacklambert/Archive 5 and User talk:Johnpacklambert/Archive 6

Adding categories, meow!!! cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵ3at BULAGA!!! 02:07, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As an FYI, I did come back and work on this article. The right sources were obscured quite a bit by the number of articles about his books, but I think I found some good sources to round the article out.--CaroleHenson (talk) 02:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Beauty Pageant AfD's

JPL, Thank you for that background. I have recently returned after a years-long wikibreak, so I am not familiar with some of the personalities. BTW, the RfC you indicated had a redlink. Did it get deleted some point in the past? Thanks again. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see it now. Thanks. I see that the consensus was that an explicit standard needed to be set. I'm just getting back into things here, so I'm not feeling like the one to restart that. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Go further down, item 61 proposes a standard.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies, I didn't read down far enough. I think it is an extremely reasonable standard, and will go there and say that. Maybe we can get other parties to chime in. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think that discussion has gotten to the point where starting a draft guideline is possible, so I went ahead and created one at Draft:Notability (beauty pageant participants). It looks like there is general agreement with your proposal. Cheers Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some gingerbread cookies for you

Gingerbread cookies
Somebody needs to recognize your efforts for taking the pageant bull by horns. Thanks! Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 03:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Great working with you. Happy Holidays/New Year to you and yours. Quis separabit? 06:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Holiday card

Wishing you a Charlie Russell Christmas,
Johnpacklambert!
"Here's hoping that the worst end of your trail is behind you
That Dad Time be your friend from here to the end
And sickness nor sorrow don't find you."
—C.M. Russell, Christmas greeting 1926.
Montanabw(talk) 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Best Wishes

Johnpacklambert,

I wish you the best this holiday season.

May the new year bring you nearer to your dreams.

BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 01:09, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:47, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Talkback

Hello, Johnpacklambert. You have new messages at Beemer69's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Happy New Year. It's been about 10 days since anyone has made any suggestions at the Draft. I think it may be time to start moving it from draft status. There has been no attempt to change the line: "Winners of sub-national level pageants or subsidiary awards...are usually not notable for such per se..." I welcome your advice as to what the next step should be. Other efforts to publicize the "debate" have drawn little to no response, so I'm of the mind to simply move it to WP space and be done with it. Thanks. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alea iacta est over here. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Indian television actresses requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tagishsimon (talk) 10:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elijah Abel

I'm reviewing this article. Perhaps you have some thought on the subject: Talk:Elijah_Abel#GA_Review. 10W40 (talk) 04:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fighting systemic bias

I just saved the article on Mongolia's current foreign minister from being prod deleted on the alleged ground of no sources. The issue of weather Mongolian government sources can be used for such a purpose is still open. I found ones from Russia, China, Nepal and a mention in a Reuters article. This is actually Tsend Mucnkh-Orgil's 2nd term as foriegn minister, and he has also been Mongolia's justice minister. No one from Europe or the United States who was even a 10th as notable would be put to prod deletion on no sources claims, and definately not have the article last 4 days there.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Bosso DiGiacobbe

This individual contacted me on my facebook page and threatened to go to the press if I did not restore the article on her. I really do not appreciate people trying to use Wikipedia as a platform for their self promotion. I just hope some people in the press will not run with another story to try to smear Wikipedia as sexist, and will actually take time to consider what is meant by reliable stories. When the coverage of her is her blog, her Linkedin page, an add article on her wedding, or a one sentance add article on someone elses wedding we are not talking about reliable, 3rd party sourcing. There is some 3rd party sourcing, but it is weak, and all focused on her being Miss Delaware USA. The following is a copy of what she said there "You're friends on Facebook Owner/Photographer at This Lovely Life Studied at Rutgers School of Law–Camden JAN 20TH, 11:31PM

Hi John,

I wanted to reach out to you about my wikipedia page. You deleted it and said there was nothing notable about me. That was pretty hurtful, considering I competed in Miss USA, was on a reality TV show on the CW Network, interned at the DE Supreme Court and am family friends with former VP Joe Biden. I also have 24,000+ followers on instagram, run a successful blog called This Lovely Life, and modeled at the Home Shopping Network.

I wanted to come to you first before taking this further to see if we could resolve this. Please get back to me as soon as you can because my wikipedia is linked on my media kit and resume and is now a broken link that many have pointed out to me. Thank you in advance for being understanding. Nicole MON 1:13PM You accepted Nicole's request. Eikipedia is not a place for self promotion. Being friends with the family of a vice president and being a contestant in Miss USA do not make one notable. You need to find another way to promote yourself and not try to misuse Wikipedia as a tool of self promotion. 10:07AM

"Competing in Miss USA does not make one notable." Interesting. I will see if the press agrees. And being a successful blogger with 25,000 fans, with photography work featured on Huffington Post, and USA Today is not notable? Graduating law school is not notable and interning at the DE Supreme Court for Chief Justice is not notable? Wow. I'm looking forward to seeing what the press has to say about all of this. You seem to try very very hard to suppress any success women have had. Very unfortunate.

Oh and participating on the CW's Network TV show is nothing to be noted either right? Yet celebrities and reality TV show stars get their own page. Hmm... I find your logic flawed entirely and really look forward to talking to the press.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have to say none of this makes a person notable. "Photography works featured on Huffington Post and USA Today". Is she claiming she is a photo-journalist? Where are the 3rd party reliable sources that cover her as such? She wants us to declare her notable just because she graduated law school. Graduating law school is 100% not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitomi Tanaka (3rd nomination). As you have participated in a previous AfD on this article, you may be interested to comment on this third AfD. Thank you. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 00:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]


Ustinov Artur

I'm ready to stand up for him. The man entered the top ten graduates of my course! He deserves to be here! Stefan Petrov — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.154.190.32 (talk) 20:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ustinov Artur

Buenas noches señoras y señores! Y en que en realidad el problema? Por favor, añada la información acerca de este hombre!!!! Marika — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.64.185.92 (talk) 21:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ustinov Artur

Hi! I ask you to add the article Ustinov Artur! Thank you! ♥♥♥

Ustinov Artur

Good afternoon! On what basis is blocked article Ustinov Artur? You make mistakes. If you continue to do this action, I will complain of you. This is a decent man. Anastasia

Marko Arapović AFD

Would you consider withdrawing your AfD nomination of Marko Arapović? He actually does meet the WP:NBASKETBALL standard as he played in Euroleague competition last year. He also meets a second SSG (WP:NOLYMPICS) by playing for the Croatian team in last year's summer games. There hasn't been much traction in the discussion, but it would save a lot of time and effort if the nomination could be withdrawn. Thanks. Rikster2 (talk) 12:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFOOTBALL

Hi Johnpacklambert, regarding WP:FOOTBALL and these two recent article you have nominated for deletion (1 & 2) players who have appeared in an official international match are considered notable per WP:NFOOTY. Thanks Inter&anthro (talk) 13:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent AFDs

Could you please respond to the questions that have arisen on you talk page and in several recent Football AFDs, rather than just blanking the discussion? Nfitz (talk) 21:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]