User talk:Zachlita: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:40, 24 December 2015

Zachlita, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Zachlita! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Civility

Hello, I'm Brianhe. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Dodge Tomahawk that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please don't describe other editors' contributions as "stupid comment" as you did here. - Brianhe (talk) 21:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you joking?

You said my edit was not civil, but it was the summary you were talking about not the edit. Dont remove my edit because you dont like the summary.Zachlita (talk) 21:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not joking. All of your communication on Wikipedia is part of the record, including edit summaries. It was the incivility of your edit summary that caught my attention, as much as the actual deletion of content which is also problematic. Are you willing to engage in a polite, consensus-based community process? If not, your contributions here will be of limited value. You might want to review WP:PILLARS; civility is one of the five core principles here and is non-negotiable. - Brianhe (talk) 21:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First time you said to me you changed my edit cos I was rude. Now you change your mind? ive edited wikipedia before i know about discussion and dont appreciate your condescending tone. i didnt call anyone stupid. I called their edit stupid. criticize the edit not the editor. if you wanna talk consensus look at the article, there are a million editors saying remove the stupid speed stuff and maybe 1 or 2 saying dont. follow the consensus.Zachlita (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 Dont remove my edit because you dont like the summary.[[User:Zachlita|Zachlita]] ([[User talk:Zachlita|talk]]) 21:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 ::I'm not joking. All of your communication on Wikipedia is part of the record, including edit summaries. It was the incivility of your edit summary that caught my attention, as much as the actual deletion of content which is also problematic. Are you willing to engage in a polite, consensus-based community process? If not, your contributions here will be of limited value. You might want to review [[WP:PILLARS]]; civility is one of the five core principles here and is non-negotiable. - [[User:Brianhe|Brianhe]] ([[User talk:Brianhe|talk]]) 21:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
+First time you said to me you changed my edit cos I was rude. Now you change your mind?
+ive edited wikipedia before i know about discussion and dont appreciate your condescending tone.
+i didnt call anyone stupid. I called their edit stupid. criticize the edit not the editor.
+if you wanna talk consensus look at the article, there are a million editors saying remove the stupid speed stuff and maybe 1 or 2 saying dont. follow the consensus.[[User:Zachlita|Zachlita]] ([[User talk:Zachlita#top|talk]]) 21:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)