Jump to content

User talk:Peacemaker67: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
+ award
Line 66: Line 66:
<br />
<br />
<big><big>Cliftonian, Mrs Cliftonian and the two little Cliftonians. —<span style="border:solid 0px;color:#fff;background:darkgreen;box-shadow:darkgray 0px 0px 3px">&nbsp;&nbsp;[[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#fff">Cliftonian</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#fff">(talk)</span>]]&nbsp;</span> 20:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
<big><big>Cliftonian, Mrs Cliftonian and the two little Cliftonians. —<span style="border:solid 0px;color:#fff;background:darkgreen;box-shadow:darkgray 0px 0px 3px">&nbsp;&nbsp;[[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#fff">Cliftonian</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#fff">(talk)</span>]]&nbsp;</span> 20:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
|}

== Congratulations ==
{| style="border: 2px solid lightsteelblue; background-color: whitesmoke;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | [[Image:WPMH ACR (Swords).png|90px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |&ensp;'''The ''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Awards#A-Class_medals|Military history A-Class medal with swords]]'''''&ensp;
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid lightsteelblue;" | On behalf of the coordinators of the Military History Wikiproject, I am pleased to award you the A-Class Medal with Swords for your work on [[Yugoslav submarine Nebojša]], [[Yugoslav submarine Hrabri]], and [[Hrabri-class submarine]], all of which passed an A-Class Review between September and December 2015. Thanks for your ongoing efforts! Cheers, [[User:AustralianRupert|AustralianRupert]] ([[User talk:AustralianRupert|talk]]) 06:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
|}
|}

Revision as of 06:30, 20 December 2015

G'day. If you have got something to say, pull up a pew and say it (but please follow the rules). There are four rules here:

  1. If you post on this page, I will (usually) reply on this page, in order to stop conversations from becoming fragmented;
  2. If you are the type of editor that rarely contributes in article space, one that prefers to moan endlessly about mouseshit on article talk pages without actually editing those articles using reliable sources, you will soon find that I am not interested in encouraging what I consider to be disruptive behaviour. If I don't respond to you, and you are wondering if this might be what I think about your approach to editing, don't be surprised if I refuse to engage in discussion with you; and
  3. If you are an editor that has posted here and had your post deleted without a response, or with an edit summary telling you to go away, don't post here again. If you have a complaint against me, there are places on WP to do that, this is not one of them. If this is you, repeated postings will result in a complaint by me against you for wikihounding. If you are intent on demonstrating that you are completely delusional, especially in areas covered by Arbitration Committee rulings, then you may find that you reap the whirlwind.
  4. I have a (short) list of editors I don't interact with, because they have pissed me off in a nuclear-meltdown sense. They should definitely know who they are, because I have told them clearly, with no likelihood of misunderstanding. I don't interact with them, and I don't care if they want to tell me about a pending nuclear Armageddon, I'd rather be fried in ignorance than have to interact with them ever again. I wish them well in whatever they perceive the afterlife to be.

This is NOT the place to ignore all rules...

the editor as a young man

Comments welcomed, be as critical as you like ;)

G'day Pm67. I've cleaned up the narrative of 33rd Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS Charlemagne (1st French), so it reads more like a sober unit history. Would appreciate a second pair of eyes, especially yours. I've tried to cut the crap and hyperbole mostly. Some of my ed comments are a bit cutting but jeez, some of it..There is one cite that I have provisionally removed, Im not sure if its NPOV. Will check further to see if its not some revisionist. Please reply on my T/P or here, as K.e.c.'s seems cluttered enough with this project. Just need a steer stylistically basically. If ok will continue in same vein and find another article for cleaning up. The 33rd now needs richer sourcing. Cheers. Simon Irondome (talk) 04:09, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually looks like a pretty decent job... ;-) Not my area of expertise within the Waffen-SS, but it has now been shorn of the thick fanboi fleece it was wearing. Well done to all involved. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 06:25, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lützow

Hi, thanks for your review and copy editing. I beleive to have addressed all your comments. MisterBee1966 (talk) 11:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crap, lost track. Yes, passed now. Thanks for the reminder! Regards, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 11:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Citation Barnstar
For actually finding what the sources were for Talk:Bijeljina massacre#RfC Table draft, despite the lack of a deadline . Many happy edits, Doctor Crazy in Room 102 of The Mental Asylum 05:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Doc. It's just the hackwork of pulling em out. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 05:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 27th Infantry Division Savska you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 10:41, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article 27th Infantry Division Savska you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:27th Infantry Division Savska for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 12:01, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1st Cavalry Division (Kingdom of Yugoslavia) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1st Cavalry Division (Kingdom of Yugoslavia) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 09:21, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Waffen SS revert

Why? The article says "...in which 84 American prisoners of war were murdered by their German captors near Malmedy, Belgium, during World War II." Eighty-four is not "approximately 90," it's 84. Sca (talk) 00:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

A very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and all your loved ones, and a joyous and prosperous 2016.

All the very best from your friends:

Cliftonian, Mrs Cliftonian and the two little Cliftonians. —  Cliftonian (talk)  20:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Congratulations

The Military history A-Class medal with swords
On behalf of the coordinators of the Military History Wikiproject, I am pleased to award you the A-Class Medal with Swords for your work on Yugoslav submarine Nebojša, Yugoslav submarine Hrabri, and Hrabri-class submarine, all of which passed an A-Class Review between September and December 2015. Thanks for your ongoing efforts! Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 06:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]