User talk:98.113.182.220: Difference between revisions
→A (New York City Subway service): restoring my comment apparently removed by accident |
I reverted your so-called edit because your IP friend happens to be a sockpuppet as I said previously. |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I see you're being a prick. Whatever. Keep it up and I'll request a temporary page protection and also, for you to be blocked from editing this site in general. Just keep it up. [[User:JoesphBarbaro|JoesphBarbaro]] ([[User talk:JoesphBarbaro|talk]]) 20:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC) |
I see you're being a prick. Whatever. Keep it up and I'll request a temporary page protection and also, for you to be blocked from editing this site in general. Just keep it up. [[User:JoesphBarbaro|JoesphBarbaro]] ([[User talk:JoesphBarbaro|talk]]) 20:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC) |
||
:@[[User:JoesphBarbaro|JoesphBarbaro]] Whoa, this seems unnecessarily hostile. And the image that was replaced isn't bad, and actually informative. This seems more like a content dispute rather than any one editor doing anything wrong. [[User:Mosmof|Mosmof]] ([[User talk:Mosmof|talk]]) 02:26, 8 May 2015 (UTC) |
|||
"JosephBarbaro the broad channel image is not good. This one is far better."? Okay, so kindly explain why. Is this really the best answer you've got? Wow. [[User:JoesphBarbaro|JoesphBarbaro]] ([[User talk:JoesphBarbaro|talk]]) 21:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC) |
"JosephBarbaro the broad channel image is not good. This one is far better."? Okay, so kindly explain why. Is this really the best answer you've got? Wow. [[User:JoesphBarbaro|JoesphBarbaro]] ([[User talk:JoesphBarbaro|talk]]) 21:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 23:40, 8 May 2015
A (New York City Subway service)
I reverted your ass because saying "Restored image, this one is the original and much better" is completely rude and arrogant. Nobody has the right to claim ownership of an article according to this site's rules. I've already had numerous fights with some other editors already, so enough. A close-up image of a car that a line currently uses is preferred, so it's either the image at Broad Channel or Far Rockaway. Period. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 21:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
I see you're being a prick. Whatever. Keep it up and I'll request a temporary page protection and also, for you to be blocked from editing this site in general. Just keep it up. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 20:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
"JosephBarbaro the broad channel image is not good. This one is far better."? Okay, so kindly explain why. Is this really the best answer you've got? Wow. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 21:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Still waiting for an answer. If you don't give me any logical answer besides the usual "I like this image because it's better than the other image", well, I'll keep reverting you until you're blue in the face. Keep it up. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 22:02, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
I honestly believe you're that same exact User:Roldank idiot who has constantly been getting on my nerves and as usual, editing warring with me at the A train article. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Trophy image in MLS Cup Finals list
You mentioned the World Series list and the NBA Finals list, but those are not equivalent. The different trophies are specifically discussed in List of NBA champions because the trophy images are specifically discussed in the body, fulfilling WP:NFCC#8. The Commissioner's Trophy image is free, so isn't under the same restrictions. Mosmof (talk) 23:51, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, please take a look at WP:NFC and WP:NFCC. The use of the images in the MLS Cup winners list fails the criteria contextual significance and minimal usage. Mosmof (talk) 10:55, 8 May 2015 (UTC)