User talk:Krimuk2.0

Archives

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Richa101091

Hi Krimuk90,

I was putting together my 3rd sockpuppet investigation for Richa101091, when I came across a likely sock User:Shwayze, who you accused of being a sock of User:Shez 15. I thought you may be interested in checking out this investigation and further linking these accounts. This seems to be a HUGE meat/sock farm for Indian-related film topics. Don't forget to check the archived cases against Richa101091 as well. This is obviously someone (or more likely someone's) creating hundreds of sock accounts to avoid detection. -War wizard90 (talk) 04:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

OMG. That is a huge list indeed! --Krimuk|90 (talk) 06:22, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi!

I thought you may like to know that I blocked the IPs from sending emails :)

Thank you so much. :) --Krimuk|90 (talk) 01:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Kangana Ranaut roles, awards list

Hi. Thanks for the welcome back. I had one query, for the above list why is "BH Surfer's Choice awards" included when they are basically a result of an internet poll? Cowlibob (talk) 16:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

I wasn't too keen on this initially. Not sure if such polls should be included or not. If we unanimously decide not to include these in any listing, I'm ok with that. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 01:41, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Should I post a RFC on the talkpage of this article or on the Indian cinema project page to establish a consensus on removing the Surfer's Choice from all relevant articles? Cowlibob (talk) 14:02, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

One at the INCINE project will be great. Thanks. :) --Krimuk|90 (talk) 14:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Done, hope I did it correctly. Cowlibob (talk) 14:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Govindudu Andarivadele

I require your help in this issue for which i explain the things in detail :

It began with an IP user adding content from a non reliable source to this article which was reverted twice by me. When that IP added it for the third time, i restrained from reverting it adhering to WP:3RR and explained that user patiently about that non reliable source in its talk page. I approached Materialscientist who reverted that edit and added the article to his watchlist. Now another IP adds the same info, same source with same errors. Now, my question is, can i revert its edit? Becasue i dont know whether 3RR is violated because of reverting a user's edit or any user's edit.

I want to bring the article to GA status which i nominated on 15 December 2014 for the same, and i dont want it to fail in its GAR on the grounds of lack of stability i.e. due to edit warring. Please suggest / help me in this issue. Thank you. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:46, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

As far as I know, WP:3RR is not violated if the edits that get reverted are vandalism. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

@Kailash29792: Observe the whole situation again and suggest me what to do. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:19, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

You can ask for the page to be semi-protected if the IPs re-add the poorly sourced info. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 02:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

CambridgeBayWeather protected the page with an expiry time of one week. I hope that its GAR will, if happens, be completed within that deadline. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry. If the IPs return after one week, the protection can be extended. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 05:31, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

My sincere apologies

Hello friend, first I'd like to express my immense appreciation to your on-going, wonderful work should I say, on the various articles you've been involved with. What I meant by this comment is definitely not to belittle your work - much before we all were lucky to see you join WP, this article had been years in the making, and the opposition was really tough to deal with. I realised that the quality required is really high and the research was really a challenging task, which included books, going through old magazines, looking everywhere and fighting many folks for what seemed to be an impossible mission. We all know that Zinta is known not for her work in films only; the variety of her activities is diverse and her image is extremely complex to put into paper. Other than that, it all happened at a time when many foreign WP editors were not really ready to accept an article on an Indian actress they were not that familiar with; it seemed too hard to digest for many. I must note that in my comment I didn't make any statements on anyone's work, and didn't refer to any specific article. Actually the article I'm most proud of (for whatever reason) is Dimple Kapadia, which was an enjoyable and highly satisfying project for me. Right now, there are really great, great articles, and your efforts are truly appreciated. Anyhow, for whatever wrong I might have said, I sincerely apologise, and I really am in complete awe of your efforts. Keep up the good work. Shahid • ^Talk2me 00:37, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Enthiran FAC 2.0

I have opened the 2nd FAC for the article. Please do let me know if you would like to make any comments. Thanks. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 02:27, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

What tge hell!

You should be ashamed what you have done. And, when are you going to consult an administrator for cgeckuser? People are not commenting on my flc for that reason. This shows your hypocrisy and hate towards Chopra as you don't want that her flc to be afeatured one and later faetured topic. Please, ask the administrator do handle it ASAP as my exams are going to start in two days.—Prashant 08:16, 10 April 2015 (UTC)