User talk:Seb az86556

earlier on this program... (archives) (+)

2009 15255    july 2009 49597    august 2009 12718    september 2009 6884    october 2009 20650    november 2009 27742    december 2009 2010 38848    january 2010 31594    february 2010 18754    march 2010 14511    april 2010 18480    may 2010 9998    june 2010 13864    july 2010 17597    august 2010 6479    september 2010 12322    october 2010 22341    november 2010 6914    december 2010 2011 27363    january 2011 15692    february 2011 16618    march 2011 12744    april 2011 9267    may 2011 5866    june 2011 13911    july 2011 4768    august 2011 4600    september 2011 5340    october 2011 13038    november 2011 15661    december 2011 2012 5527    january 2012 6684    february 2012 6179    march 2012 7290    april 2012 8723    may 2012 10438    june 2012 5929    july 2012 7638    august 2012 14328    september 2012 16008    october 2012 9891    november 2012 1822    december 2012 2013 12285    january 2013 8185    february 2013 18650    march 2013 6264    april 2013

My Bad

Thank you for the notification concerning my talk page edit summary. Can any Admin remove it please? Kaz 21:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC) And is there any way can I get a block on my talk page from ever getting it edited by non-Admins ever again please? I have suffered my fair share of harassment. Kaz 21:22, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

talk pages are protected only in exceptional circumstances; you can try requesting it, but I don't see any reason. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 21:32, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

and "stalker" is also a personal attack. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 21:33, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much for chiming in!...

It seems like you are an experienced editor. Thank you so much for chiming in into this mess that is ongoing for the past month or so regarding Karaites and these so-called "Crimean Karaites." I have written a series of remarks and objections to this random, partial, religiously motivated rewriting of history, and no experienced editor to this date has reacted to the series of warnings I have posted along the way. The two edits you just did show you know what we are talking about here, and you are not going to be misled by false allegations. I have a pretty good of the historical issues, but my WP editing/administrative knowledge is still much weaker than I would like, especially to meet the enormous challenge that is being represented by this under-the-radar, stealth threat to WP's historical integrity. I am really grateful for any assistance you can provide. Regards, warshy^talk 22:05, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. I am not particularly knowledgeable about this topic, but there clearly is some hard-headed disruption going on. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 22:07, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Well, I'd say it is hard to fathom and to really describe in short, accurate sentences the amount of religiously motivated re-writing of history that has been going on in this area. I wish I was good enough at the art of "diffs" to show you how I warned about all this over a month ago, and now, today, this cancer really started to spread beyond my technical ability to contain it, or to really cope with it in a technically satisfactory manner. Unfortunately, I still have a lot to learn about the "art of the diff" here in WP to be able to do that in a couple of minutes. I think the adjective you used above is a very appropriate, and it does show that you know what I am talking about here. Thanks again for chiming in, as I was starting to consider just 'leaving WP to the vultures.' warshy^talk 22:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

B. Hussein Soetoro

Why do you find this username inappropriate? [1] NTox · talk 02:46, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Nevermind on this one. I've been informed. NTox · talk 03:17, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Pointy....

With regards to [2]: I understand where you are coming from, but see WP:POINT. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 00:10, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

I don't. Unless you want to remove the entire section. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 00:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

The original question is not particularly well stated, but has already collected a number of useful replies explaining e.g. how a mistaken impression of rudeness could arise. Your question is much more inflammatory, is unlikely to produce similarly useful answers, and runs afoul of WP:ARBR&I discretionary sanctions. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 00:16, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

I completely disagree; the initial post is blatant racism (albeit cloaked in polite language and some weird episode-derived theories) and the people politely answering it are either too naive or too whatever to notice it. My question "why would you even answer that?" didn't ring a bell either. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 00:18, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

So if somebody lets his dog poop on the street, do you gain anything by squatting down and leaving a bigger one? Why don't you explain your concern directly? If people are as naive as you think, they might assume you are a racist now. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 00:22, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

I just did. Now, are you willing to chime in and do something about the remaining racist post, or are you here to defend it? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 00:23, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

racist header

I suggest you modify "why are indians so rude" to "why am I offended by the personal interactions of certain Indians" or something similar. See WP:MOS re neutrality in section heads. (BTW, I would simply have hatted the discussion, but too many of the usual suspects have provided their "answers".)μηδείς (talk) 02:09, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

racist header

I suggest you modify "why are indians so rude" to "why am I personally offended by the actions of certain Indians" or something similarly neutral. See WP:NPOV. (BTW, I would simply have hatted the discussion, but too many of the usual suspects have provided their "answers".) μηδείς (talk) 02:13, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Crimean Karaites

Hello, your input would be appreciated more on the subject of the name and content of the article again which has arisen again here Talk:Crimean Karaites#Turkic Karaites - Edit request. Having read through the disputes thoroughly, I am getting the feeling that really this is all about a certain Ukrainian user who is going to maximum cry-wolf efforts to try and ensure that the article does not lose the "Crimean" label. Hope you will stay involved. Budo (talk) 11:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

thanks. I'll be observing the situation. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 20:07, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

--Jethro B 00:04, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi Seb az86556. I noticed that you opened a successful sockpuppet investigation against User:Mangoeater1000 pertaining his/her edits regarding NYU Poly-related articles. I opened a new one and would appreciate if you could weight with your experiences if possible. Thank you and regards. -- Marco Guzman, Jr  Talk  20:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Marco Guzman, Jr

please block user Marco Guzman, Jr because

1. Desperately trying to promote California State Polytechnic University, Pomona by citing self-aggrandizing, self-hosted webpage of CalPoly http://www.dsa.csupomona.edu/visitors/Distinction.asp which clearly has wrong info(it say there are 9 true polytechnic in the USA, in reality there are more than 10) in reputed colleges' wiki pages such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rensselaer_Polytechnic_Institute http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Institute_of_Technology_(United_States)&action=history

2. keeps adding unsourced promo materials to all California State Polytechnic University, Pomona articles, lowering their quality. Sometimes the sources don't agree with the content. I just fixed the CalPoly engineering college article. This is how the article looked before I fixed it http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cal_Poly_Pomona_College_of_Engineering&oldid=515273265 This is just one example. He included academic boosterism in all California State Polytechnic University, Pomona articles

3. I think most of these user's IP addresses are socks of Marco Guzman, Jr http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cal_Poly_Pomona_College_of_Engineering&action=history

4. Marco Guzman, Jr and his socks create pages like this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Cal_Poly_Pomona_presidents which are not allowed in wiki and is supposed to be merged with the college's wiki page

You misunderstood the warning. Seb az86556 is not an admin and cannot actually block users. All Wikipedia users may place the warning template to encourage users to act/edit more appropriately. If you feel there is sufficiant evidence of a sock, please use Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations.--Amadscientist (talk) 04:30, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Crimean Karaites

Hi Seb, I left a reply to you on Talk:Crimean Karaites on 15:00, 11 October 2012 and am waiting for your feedback. Best wishes. Budo (talk) 13:36, 15 October 2012 (UTC)