User talk:Maxval: Difference between revisions
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →Warning of discretionary sanctions: new section |
|||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
::I prefer to ignore that page in the future, I will let Hungarian Nazi-Horthysts to do everything they want. I hope somebody else will stop them. I see no reason for apologizing, as I was absolutely right. --[[User:Maxval|maxval]] ([[User talk:Maxval|talk]]) 16:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC) |
::I prefer to ignore that page in the future, I will let Hungarian Nazi-Horthysts to do everything they want. I hope somebody else will stop them. I see no reason for apologizing, as I was absolutely right. --[[User:Maxval|maxval]] ([[User talk:Maxval|talk]]) 16:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Warning of discretionary sanctions == |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
| image = yes |
|||
| The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], satisfy any [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standard of behavior]], or follow any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren#Final decision|Final decision]]" section of the decision page. |
|||
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]], with the appropriate sections of [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures]], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> |
|||
| valign = center |
|||
| [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|35px|alt=|link=]] |
|||
}} You have been calling other editors Nazis due to a dispute at the [[Miklós Horthy]] article. For instance [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Miklós_Horthy&diff=prev&oldid=498355008 here]. Any further disruption may lead to a block or a topic ban. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 13:51, 21 June 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:51, 21 June 2012
Welcome!
Hello, Maxval, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
--Jtir 21:22, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
your edit to Kazohinia
Hi, I reverted your edits to Kazohinia because they removed sourced material and introduced unsourced material. Since you are a new editor, I thought you might like a more personal welcome than a revert.
If you can find a source (e.g. a book review) that says: "The theme is a criticism of developed communistic society, ..." then it can be added to the article. Kazohinia is undersourced, so it could use your help.
Also, please give an edit summary so other editors will know why you made your changes.
--Jtir 21:28, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! Kazo sounds like an interesting film. --Jtir 09:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Diplomatic missions of Hungary
Hi Maxval,
I removed your edits to Diplomatic Missions of Hungary. You will notice that this and the other 180+ articles follow the same style. Non-resident accreditations details could perhaps be covered in the respective bilateral relations articles. Kransky (talk) 10:53, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- You removed my other edits too... I revert them. --maxval (talk) 14:00, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Deo Volente
Hello partner, Welcome in id.wiki, su.wiki, jv.wiki, map-bms.wiki, and ms.wiki! Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 05:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problem: True Church of Jesus Christ Restored
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as True Church of Jesus Christ Restored, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.novelguide.com/a/discover/ear_01/ear_01_00124.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:True Church of Jesus Christ Restored and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:True Church of Jesus Christ Restored with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:True Church of Jesus Christ Restored.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:True Church of Jesus Christ Restored saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 23:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
July 2010 /Personal attacks
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Tgr. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.--B@xter9 06:53, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
ss --maxval (talk) 15:12, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Under attack from Hungarian Wiki Nazis
This is my reply to Hungarian Wiki Nazis.
Inclusion of UK constituent countries in List of countries that border only one other country
Please do not revert the inclusion of the United Kingdom subsection in List of countries that border only one other country without first discussing it on the talk page. There has been a heated debate about whether these should be included in the list, and as a compromise they have been placed into a separate section. My personal view is that they're not needed at all, and this obviously matches your view, but please give us the courtesy of expressing your opinions on Talk before just removing them. Thanks, Bazonka (talk) 14:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Maxval, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Maxval.
- See a log of files removed today here.
- Shut off the bot here.
- Report errors here.
- If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
files
Sovereign states and navigation templates
Please see the RFC related to a Template talk:Oceania topic discussion or associated edits you participated in. Japinderum (talk) 07:20, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Warning: Disruptive Behaviour
(Nazi content deleted) Sorry, buy your Nyilas comments are not welcome here. I have deleted them. (maxval (talk) 07:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC))
Bare Urls
Surely you have been in Wikipedia long enough to realise that WP:Bare URLs are not an appropriate way of citing references. — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 15:43, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- OK. I forgot that. --maxval (talk) 15:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Complaint about your edits
Hello Maxval. Please see a complaint about your edits that was posted at User talk:EdJohnston#User:Maxval by Nmate. You may respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I will refrain from any comments. I prefer to not be in contact with those people who are having a Nazi-flavored campaign against me. If they post to my page, I will delete them, but I wont have any discussion with them, as I maintain a zero tolerance policy in this issue. --maxval (talk) 16:10, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Your 'zero tolerance' policy does not take precedence over WP:No personal attacks. If you intend to keep editing at Miklós Horthy you should be aware that admins have the ability to ban people under WP:ARBEE from participating on articles which they have shown they cannot edit neutrally. Your lack of calmness on the subject of Horthy is now on record. If you would like to withdraw any of your previous attacks, or apologize to the people you could have offended, that would be well received. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:18, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- I prefer to ignore that page in the future, I will let Hungarian Nazi-Horthysts to do everything they want. I hope somebody else will stop them. I see no reason for apologizing, as I was absolutely right. --maxval (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Warning of discretionary sanctions
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
You have been calling other editors Nazis due to a dispute at the Miklós Horthy article. For instance here. Any further disruption may lead to a block or a topic ban. EdJohnston (talk) 13:51, 21 June 2012 (UTC)