User talk:Stifle: Difference between revisions
Ncmvocalist (talk | contribs) →Your edit at WP:AE: new section |
→Disruption at AE: new section |
||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
I've reverted your edit to Brews ohare appeal as inappropriate; I left a set of procedural notes so that no one would make the sort of edit you did, but evidently, neither you, nor Jehochman, made a remote effort to read what was written. It was poor judgement; you should familiarise yourself with the full facts rather than act and then think later. Note that of my notes, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ncmvocalist&diff=378307117&oldid=378097517 an arb has specifically endorsed my second bullet point]. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 08:31, 11 August 2010 (UTC) |
I've reverted your edit to Brews ohare appeal as inappropriate; I left a set of procedural notes so that no one would make the sort of edit you did, but evidently, neither you, nor Jehochman, made a remote effort to read what was written. It was poor judgement; you should familiarise yourself with the full facts rather than act and then think later. Note that of my notes, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ncmvocalist&diff=378307117&oldid=378097517 an arb has specifically endorsed my second bullet point]. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 08:31, 11 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Disruption at AE == |
|||
I think you need to block somebody.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&curid=12936136&diff=378328314&oldid=378328089] [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 08:32, 11 August 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:32, 11 August 2010
Welcome to my talk page. Before posting, please read my Frequently Asked Questions, which may answer your question. If your issue does not need to be handled specifically by me, please try posting to a relevant noticeboard in order to obtain a quick reply. Otherwise, you are welcome to post in the usual way. |
- Older archives
- Archive: December 2008 (1st-9th) (10th-17th) (18th-21st) (22nd-31st)
- Archive: January 2009
- Archive: February 2009 (1st-9th) (10th-16th) (17th-24th) (25th-28th)
- Archive: March 2009 (1st-11th) (12th-16th) (17th-31st)
- Archive: April 2009
- Archive: May 2009 (1st-10th) (11th-31st)
- Archive: June 2009 (1st-10th) (11th-17th) (18th-30th)
- Archive: July 2009 (1st-9th) (10th-31st)
- Archive: August 2009
- Archive: September 2009 (1st-7th) (8th-30th)
- Archive: October 2009 (1st-16th) (17th-31st)
- Archive: November 2009
- Archive: December 2009
- Archive: January 2010
- Archive: February 2010
- Archive: March 2010 (1st-13th) (14th-31st)
- Archive: April 2010 (1st-9th) (10th-30th)
- Archive: May 2010 (1st-9th) (10th-16th) (17th-31st)
- Archive: June 2010 (1st-16th) (17th-30th)
- Archive: July 2010
- Archive: August 2010 (1st-9th)
Replies
- Please reply to me here if possible.
- If your message is about an AFD or other discussion that you want me to (re)contribute to, I will generally not reply other than by checking the page and adding a comment.
- I will normally reply here and copy my reply to your talk page, but may sometimes use {{talkback}} or, occasionally, reply here only.
- Please don't leave your email address. My email address is user.stiflegmail.com and you can contact me there if you need me urgently.
- Exception: if you are requesting the text of a deleted article, then make sure your preferences include a valid, confirmed email address, as I will email the article to you at that address (only).
Veterinary terms
Hi. Regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal and veterinary terms in Karimojong, could you check the deleted article, to see if there were any references in it? If there were, please userfy the article for me, and I'll try to determine where Wiktionary might want the content. If there were no references, then I don't have time for it. Much thanks :) -- Quiddity (talk) 23:35, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Done, User:Quiddity/Animal and veterinary terms in Karimojong; tag it {{db-userreq}} when you're done. Stifle (talk) 08:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010
- News and notes: FBI requests takedown of seal, Public Policy advisors and ambassadors, Cary Bass leaving, new Research Committee
- In the news: Wikinews interviews Umberto Eco, and more
- Sister projects: Strategic Planning update
- WikiProject report: Chocks away for WikiProject Aviation
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
This editor is edit-warring at Mitanni and his edits are Armenian related. You gave him a sanction warning in June, is this (besides being clear edit-warring) a violation of that sanction? Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 09:58, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Please file your request at WP:AE. Stifle (talk) 10:08, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Shouldn't your warning have been logged? Dougweller (talk) 13:09, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- I suppose, although few if any other users have done so. Stifle (talk) 13:22, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Shouldn't your warning have been logged? Dougweller (talk) 13:09, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Saffron Coomber listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Saffron Coomber. Since you had some involvement with the Saffron Coomber redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). J Milburn (talk) 12:58, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Could you please userfy an article you have deleted to my user space?
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Cartoon - I feel that this is clearly notable and I would like to add some more references to satisfy WP:V and redo the article. Thanks! meshach (talk) 19:09, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
AfD review please
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basic Fantasy RPG, you can take a second look please? There were two users suggested a merge, which makes sense. All said it should be Keep did not cite any evidence notability or improved referencing required to keep it. I believe WP:ILIKEIT keep votes should be discounted. Thank you. Miami33139 (talk) 22:50, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- I think I need to second this request. Reyk YO! 01:31, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- While I'm happy to answer questions, it looks like your question is answered in my FAQs. They're linked at the top of my talk page and in the editnotice. Why not check them out next time?
- AFDs have ultimately two results, which are delete and not-delete. Merge, no consensus, redirect, and so on are all variants on not-delete. I don't think there's any question that the article should be deleted. Any editor can take normal editorial actions such as merging or redirecting, either unilaterally or after a discussion on the article talk page. Stifle (talk) 08:02, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Your edit at WP:AE
I've reverted your edit to Brews ohare appeal as inappropriate; I left a set of procedural notes so that no one would make the sort of edit you did, but evidently, neither you, nor Jehochman, made a remote effort to read what was written. It was poor judgement; you should familiarise yourself with the full facts rather than act and then think later. Note that of my notes, an arb has specifically endorsed my second bullet point. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:31, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Disruption at AE
I think you need to block somebody.[1] Jehochman Talk 08:32, 11 August 2010 (UTC)