Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 29: Line 29:
::How are they not vandalism, when he keeps adding in dubious/unsourced content against repeated warnings? I am not seeing how this is a content dispute. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 20:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
::How are they not vandalism, when he keeps adding in dubious/unsourced content against repeated warnings? I am not seeing how this is a content dispute. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 20:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
:::Oh, I see. I read the link you provided, and it excuses him because it was unintentional misinformation and he does not yet understand how Wikipedia works. Hmm. I still do not fully get that, since plenty of IPs do not understand how Wikipedia works either...and yet they are not excused after repeated warnings. But oh well. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 21:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
:::Oh, I see. I read the link you provided, and it excuses him because it was unintentional misinformation and he does not yet understand how Wikipedia works. Hmm. I still do not fully get that, since plenty of IPs do not understand how Wikipedia works either...and yet they are not excused after repeated warnings. But oh well. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 21:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
::::This page is, to quote from above, "for '''obvious''' and '''persistent''' vandals and spammers only," hence my suggestion of appropriate noticeboards. —[[User:Department of Redundancy Department|DoRD]] ([[User talk:Department of Redundancy Department|talk]]) 21:27, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
*{{IPvandal|173.81.182.46}} - vandalism after recent release of block. Straight off a three month block, this user has again gone back to their disruptive editing (for which they were blocked for in the first place). User has already gotten a Warn4IM warning (issued by me) and has received a full set of warnings prior. User hasn't learned. Requesting 6 month block.. <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:#900;background-color:White;">NeutralHomer</span>]] • [[User talk:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:Black;background-color:White;">Talk</span>]] • 20:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC)</small> 20:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC) <!-- Marked -->
*{{IPvandal|173.81.182.46}} - vandalism after recent release of block. Straight off a three month block, this user has again gone back to their disruptive editing (for which they were blocked for in the first place). User has already gotten a Warn4IM warning (issued by me) and has received a full set of warnings prior. User hasn't learned. Requesting 6 month block.. <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:#900;background-color:White;">NeutralHomer</span>]] • [[User talk:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:Black;background-color:White;">Talk</span>]] • 20:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC)</small> 20:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC) <!-- Marked -->
:*'''Note''': User is in the categories: [[:Category:IP addresses used for vandalism|IP addresses used for vandalism]], [[:Category:Shared IP addresses|Shared IP addresses]], [[:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets|Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets]]. [[User:HBC AIV helperbot7|HBC AIV helperbot7]] ([[User talk:HBC AIV helperbot7|talk]]) 20:58, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
:*'''Note''': User is in the categories: [[:Category:IP addresses used for vandalism|IP addresses used for vandalism]], [[:Category:Shared IP addresses|Shared IP addresses]], [[:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets|Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets]]. [[User:HBC AIV helperbot7|HBC AIV helperbot7]] ([[User talk:HBC AIV helperbot7|talk]]) 20:58, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:27, 9 March 2010

    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 22:07 on 6 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.



    Alerts

    User-reported

    Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Consider making a report at WP:ANI or WP:ANEW. —DoRD (talk) 20:56, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    How are they not vandalism, when he keeps adding in dubious/unsourced content against repeated warnings? I am not seeing how this is a content dispute. Flyer22 (talk) 20:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh, I see. I read the link you provided, and it excuses him because it was unintentional misinformation and he does not yet understand how Wikipedia works. Hmm. I still do not fully get that, since plenty of IPs do not understand how Wikipedia works either...and yet they are not excused after repeated warnings. But oh well. Flyer22 (talk) 21:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    This page is, to quote from above, "for obvious and persistent vandals and spammers only," hence my suggestion of appropriate noticeboards. —DoRD (talk) 21:27, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]