Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests: Difference between revisions
Fred Bauder (talk | contribs) =User:ChrisO, User:Levzur= recuse |
MartinHarper (talk | contribs) WHEELER rejected for now, recuse from Zviad dispute |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
====Arbitrator's opinions on hearing this matter==== |
====Arbitrator's opinions on hearing this matter==== |
||
* Recuse [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 11:23, Apr 26, 2004 (UTC) |
* Recuse [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 11:23, Apr 26, 2004 (UTC) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
=== WHEELER and 172 === |
|||
I would like to request oversight on the dealings [[172]] has with my posts. First, I posted a direct quote from Mussolini with reference. He deleted it. Second, I posted book references in Talk section of Fascism. he removed them, Placed his selections before mine and labeled mine 'polemical'. He will archive a section. Move his stuff forward and archive my posts. Third, I posted images for talking points at the top, he removes them to the reference section as if he doesn't want anybody to see them. I need some help and I need a referee. CAN'T THIS MAN LEAVE ME ALONE AND MY POSTS. He uses one rule for everybody but uses another rule for me. I am getting sick and tired of being harrassed by his edits and reverts, edits and reverts. He is constantly moving my stuff. He doesn't talk to anybody else now. There is a group on there that only talk within themselves and not address others as if we are below them.[[User:WHEELER|WHEELER]] 23:28, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC) |
|||
==== arbitrator's opinions on hearing this matter ==== |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
* Refer to [[wikipedia:Mediation Committee|Mediation Committee]]. [[User:MyRedDice|Martin]] 12:32, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC) |
|||
* I think you should try mediation first. --[[User:Camembert|Camembert]] 17:41, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC) |
|||
* Mediate. --[[User:The Epopt|the Epopt]] 22:06, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC) |
|||
* Please seek mediation. --[[User:Maveric149|mav]] 08:58, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC) |
|||
==Matters currently in Arbitration== |
==Matters currently in Arbitration== |
||
| Line 44: | Line 34: | ||
* Matter of Haephestos - '''Rejected''' - due to lack of community desire or allegations. Case referred by Jimbo Feb 19, 2004, rejected Feb 26, 2004. Discussion moved to [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Hephaestos]]. |
* Matter of Haephestos - '''Rejected''' - due to lack of community desire or allegations. Case referred by Jimbo Feb 19, 2004, rejected Feb 26, 2004. Discussion moved to [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Hephaestos]]. |
||
* Wheeler vs 172 - '''Rejected''' - please try mediation first. Discussion moved to [[user talk:WHEELER]] |
|||
== Completed requests == |
== Completed requests == |
||
Revision as of 16:53, 26 April 2004
The last step of Wikipedia:Dispute resolution is Arbitration, (see arbitration for a general overview of the topic). If, and only if, all other steps have failed and you see no reasonable chance that the matter can be resolved in another manner, you may request that it be decided by the arbitration committee.
See Wikipedia:Arbitration policy, Wikipedia:Arbitrators
Earlier Steps
Please review Wikipedia:Dispute resolution for other avenues you should take before requesting arbitration. If you do not follow any of these routes, it is highly likely that your request for arbitration will be rejected.
Current requests
The procedure for accepting requests is descibed at arbitration policy. Be brief - put a quick list of the nature of the complaints. Link to detailed evidence elsewhere if you need to.
I am requesting arbitration concerning an interminable reversion war on Zviad Gamsakhurdia (history/talk). Despite a clear consensus following a request for community consensus, User:Levzur has persisted in deleting a section of the article that he does not like in order to impose his own POV, often dishonestly marking his edits as minor "corrections". I should add that the section in question was originally written by myself but has subsequently been rewritten by User:MyRedDice. I am making this request on the basis of being the original author; others may wish to join as co-requesters.
In addition, a reversion conflict appears to be developing on Nino Burjanadze. Although I am not formally including this in the arbitration request, the committee may wish to consider it both in the light of establishing a pattern of behaviour and to head off a particularly pointless fresh conflict.
Please see User:Levzur/Evidence for details of this dispute. -- ChrisO 10:13, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Note: The mediation committee has been involved in this case but Levzur did not agree to mediation. See Wikipedia:Requests for mediation and User talk:Levzur -- sannse (talk) 10:29, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC) (mediation committee)
Arbitrator's opinions on hearing this matter
- Recuse Fred Bauder 11:23, Apr 26, 2004 (UTC)
- Recuse. Martin 16:53, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Matters currently in Arbitration
- /Wik2 - Accepted for arbitration with four votes, on 9 April 2004. Evidence to /Wik2/Evidence, please. For discussion and voting on this matter see /Wik2.
- /Mav v. 168 - Accepted for arbitration with four votes, on April 20, 2004. Evidence to /Mav v. 168/Evidence please. For discussion and voting on this matter see /Mav v. 168.
- /JRR Trollkien - Accepted for arbitration with four votes, on April 20, 2004. Evidence to /JRR Trollkien/Evidence please. For discussion and voting on this matter see /JRR Trollkien. Note that this case is accepted solely to determine whether, under existing Wikipedia policy, it is acceptable for sysops to ban obvious trolls.
- /Paul Vogel - Accepted for arbitration with four votes, on April 23, 2004. Evidence to /Paul Vogel/Evidence please. For discussion and voting on this matter see /Paul Vogel.
Rejected requests
- Matter of Haephestos - Rejected - due to lack of community desire or allegations. Case referred by Jimbo Feb 19, 2004, rejected Feb 26, 2004. Discussion moved to Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Hephaestos.
- Wheeler vs 172 - Rejected - please try mediation first. Discussion moved to user talk:WHEELER
Completed requests
- /Theresa knott vs. Mr-Natural-Health - Decided on 11th Februry 2004 that Mr-Natural-Health would be banned from editing for 30 days (i.e., until 12 Mar 2004). The vote was 6-2 in favor of banning, with 2 explicit and 1 de-facto abstention.
- /Plautus satire vs Raul654 - Decided on 11th March 2004 that Plautus satire is to be banned for one year, up to and including March 11 2005. The vote was unanimous with 8 votes in favour and 1 de-facto abstention; a further vote in favour of extending the ban indefinitely was held but not met.
- /Wik - Decided on 15th March 2004 that Wik would have a three month probation during which he may be temp-banned in certain circumstances. There were six votes in favour, three opposed, and one de-facto abstention. Further decisions and minority opinions can be read at /Wik.
- /Irismeister - Decided on 31st March 2004 that Irismeister would be banned from editing all pages for ten days, and banned from editing Iridology indefinitely. Decision can be found at /Irismeister/Decision.
- /Anthony DiPierro - Decided on 25th April 2004 to instruct Anthony with regards to his VfD edits, and refer other issues to mediation. The vote was unanimous with 6 votes in favour and 4 de-facto abstentions. Note that the case was accepted solely to investigate use of VfD.