User talk:Nableezy

Notice: Civility does not exist on this page. If you feel the need to say something uncivil to me feel free to do so. Personal attacks too, though if you say something be prepared to either back it up or have a large collection of insults hurled at you. Be forewarned that I give as good as I get, actually better.

Haaretz

Be careful not to violate 3RR. — [[::User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] (talk · contribs) 22:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

You think the last one is a revert? nableezy - 22:18, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

It wasn't, but they take a pretty broad view of 3RR at WP:ANEW. It's probably best not to make more than three non-consecutive edits during any 24-hour period. — [[::User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] (talk · contribs) 22:26, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

your revert in the Ethnic Cleansing article

Concerning the revert you made of the material in the ethnic cleansing article with the summary "it actually is well sourced with scholarly text calling it such" - I responded to these concerns on the talk page [1] and demonstrated carefully that the sources that were used in writing the article did not in fact support what was claimed. No page numbers were cited, authors were cited as support that simply did not support. As it stands the edit is improperly sourced as well as misleading. As I suggested on the talk page, you can rewrite the section with proper sources that actually support the contention. In the meantime, it would be wrong to leave such poorly and even wrongfully sourced material in. I went to some trouble to write a small essay that showed the passage was not "well sourced with scholarly text," before I deleted the passage. Did you [even] read it prior to your revert? Stellarkid (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes I did, and I also saw the detailed response that showed multiple scholars using the term. You really want to contend that Ilan Pappé's The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine is not a proper source for the material? You want page numbers? pps xi - 261. nableezy - 03:41, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

UNISPAL links

Hi, Just in case you are doing it the hard way like I did until recently, here is a quick way to find unispal links to the documents that used to be in domino. I'm not sure it always works but I've have some luck with it. Consider the change you just make on Palestinian refugee:

Old: domino.un.org/unispal.nsf/9a798adbf322aff38525617b006d88d7/93037e3b939746de8525610200567883!OpenDocument

New: unispal.un.org/unispal.nsf/b792301807650d6685256cef0073cb80/93037e3b939746de8525610200567883?OpenDocument

The key is that the second long code is the same as before. To find it, do this search in Google:

site:unispal.un.org   intext:93037e3b939746de8525610200567883

Hope that's not old news. It might also work without the "intext:". Cheers. Zero^talk 14:37, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, and I was doing it the hard way. This should make it easier. nableezy - 14:45, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Return of Samaria

Hi Nableezy,

I'd fix this myself, but seeing as I'm barred from editing on the topic, doing so may be a bad idea... Shuki (talk · contribs) has taken it upon himself to add infoboxes to a number of settlements, and in doing so, labeling them as being in Samaria (e.g. here, here or here).

Could you have a look if you've got the spare minutes and nerves?

Many thanks, pedrito - talk - 15:33 18.08.2009

P.S. By the way, cool signature ;)