Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nrcprm2026: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Report date June 18 2009, 21:29 (UTC): +Splargo, needs checkuser IMHO
Line 14: Line 14:
<!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##-->
<!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##-->
* {{checkuser|Splargo}}
* {{checkuser|Splargo}}
* {{checkuser|GoRight}}


;Evidence submitted by [[User:RadTek|RadTek]]
;Evidence submitted by [[User:RadTek|RadTek]]
Line 36: Line 37:


[[User:Splargo]] has showed up at [[Talk:Cold_fusion#How_to_get_patent_story_NPOV.3F]] with massive knowledge of what has been going at the article despite being a new account that had never previously contributed to the article. He is defending the text that was inserted by [[User:GetLinkPrimitiveParams]], who started editing in 18 November 2008, eight days after the[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/LossIsNotMore|last checkuser in LossIsNotMore]], and has stopped editing in 1 June 2009. Splargo has started editing in 14 June 2009. Checkusered [[User:IwRnHaA]] also defended lots of primary sources in [[Talk:Cold fusion]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cold_fusion&diff=prev&oldid=250647778] to try to contradict secondary sources, just like these two users did. I would advice a checkuser to catch the whole sock farm. --[[User:Enric Naval|Enric Naval]] ([[User talk:Enric Naval|talk]]) 03:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
[[User:Splargo]] has showed up at [[Talk:Cold_fusion#How_to_get_patent_story_NPOV.3F]] with massive knowledge of what has been going at the article despite being a new account that had never previously contributed to the article. He is defending the text that was inserted by [[User:GetLinkPrimitiveParams]], who started editing in 18 November 2008, eight days after the[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/LossIsNotMore|last checkuser in LossIsNotMore]], and has stopped editing in 1 June 2009. Splargo has started editing in 14 June 2009. Checkusered [[User:IwRnHaA]] also defended lots of primary sources in [[Talk:Cold fusion]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cold_fusion&diff=prev&oldid=250647778] to try to contradict secondary sources, just like these two users did. I would advice a checkuser to catch the whole sock farm. --[[User:Enric Naval|Enric Naval]] ([[User talk:Enric Naval|talk]]) 03:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

[[User:GoRight]] arrived as an apparently experienced editor a few months after Nrcprm2026 was banned, taking a very active position in Global Warming topics as Nrcprm2026 did, and also later acting in the Cold Fusion article similarly to how Nrcprm2026 and later his sock [[User:IwRnHaA|IwRnHaA]] edited Cold Fusion. None of this is conclusive, but I do think a check would be worthwhile. --[[User:Noren|Noren]] ([[User talk:Noren|talk]]) 04:41, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Revision as of 04:41, 19 June 2009

Nrcprm2026

Nrcprm2026

Nrcprm2026 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected


Report date June 18 2009, 21:29 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by RadTek

Nrcprm2026 is a habitual sockpuppeteer. Users listed above, as well as many others to be sure all demonstrate an obsession with particular subject matters including depleted uranium, nutrition, instant runoff voting and hybrid vehicles.

Please refer to prior check users for additional information. [1]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Denied. User:RadTek is using phrasing and quotations of banned user User:TDC a/k/a User:Hempbilly and is unlikely to "always" misspell the name of his alleged employer. There appears to be no interaction between James Salsman a/k/a User:Nrcprm2026 and anyone from Exelon on the RadSafe mailing list and no posts by James Salsman to RadSafe in the past year. RadTek is deleting secondary peer-reviewed sources from Depleted uranium (the only secondary sources in that entire article) and Uranium. KeepinReal (talk) 01:26, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mr Salsman, your harassing emails to my supervisor was a few years ago, late 2006. A coworker of mine and member of the RadSafe list informed of this truly sad charade you put on here.
I dont know who tdc or hempbilly are and frankly I could care less.
Normally I wouldn’t waste my time, but considering how widely used a reference Wikipedia has become, I cant sit back. Your continued antics both here and on other sites make you look positively pathetic. I suggest you seek professional help. RadTek (talk) 01:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by other users

User:Splargo has showed up at Talk:Cold_fusion#How_to_get_patent_story_NPOV.3F with massive knowledge of what has been going at the article despite being a new account that had never previously contributed to the article. He is defending the text that was inserted by User:GetLinkPrimitiveParams, who started editing in 18 November 2008, eight days after thelast checkuser in LossIsNotMore, and has stopped editing in 1 June 2009. Splargo has started editing in 14 June 2009. Checkusered User:IwRnHaA also defended lots of primary sources in Talk:Cold fusion [2] to try to contradict secondary sources, just like these two users did. I would advice a checkuser to catch the whole sock farm. --Enric Naval (talk) 03:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:GoRight arrived as an apparently experienced editor a few months after Nrcprm2026 was banned, taking a very active position in Global Warming topics as Nrcprm2026 did, and also later acting in the Cold Fusion article similarly to how Nrcprm2026 and later his sock IwRnHaA edited Cold Fusion. None of this is conclusive, but I do think a check would be worthwhile. --Noren (talk) 04:41, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions