Jump to content

Talk:Peter King (American politician): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Erik9bot (talk | contribs)
add "listas" parameter to Template:WPBiography
→‎NPOV?: new section
Line 28: Line 28:


I am making the change, easily reverted if someone feels strongly. But... please explain the relevance to the article if you re-add.[[User:Sinneed|sinneed]] ([[User talk:Sinneed|talk]]) 01:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
I am making the change, easily reverted if someone feels strongly. But... please explain the relevance to the article if you re-add.[[User:Sinneed|sinneed]] ([[User talk:Sinneed|talk]]) 01:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

== NPOV? ==

Peter King has made a number of controversial comments and committed a few actions that were widely attacked during his time in Congress, and yet there is no mention of anything controversial on this page, presenting a very unbalanced picture. Earlier versions of this page included both King's legislative accomplishments and some of the controversial comments (e.g. endorsement of racial profiling, and condemning an opponent for accepting campaign contributions from an Islamic group which King himself had accepted an even greater donation from). The page has been vastly expanded since I last looked at it, and it has at the same time become far less neutral. [[Special:Contributions/68.194.217.223|68.194.217.223]] ([[User talk:68.194.217.223|talk]]) 05:15, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:16, 12 May 2009

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconU.S. Congress Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
This article has not yet been assigned a subject.
The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

Template:WikiProjectNotreDame Template:Archive box collapsible

2008 election

King again sought re-election to Congress in 2008 and while the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) had planned to target King's seat in 2008, they let the Nassau Democrats find a candidate and effectively removed NY-03 from their watchlist. The Nassau Democrats fielded Graham Long in a long-shot bid to defeat King.[1]. Long works for Nassau County as a member of the Long Island Regional Planning Board, and his family owns a catering business in Glen Cove.

King won the 2008 election, garnering 64% of the vote.

That seems to me to be all about the DCCC, and has not much to do with the article. This is about King.

How about:

King again sought re-election to Congress in 2008. The Democrats fielded Graham Long in a long-shot bid to defeat King.[2] King won the 2008 election with 64% of the vote.

I am making the change, easily reverted if someone feels strongly. But... please explain the relevance to the article if you re-add.sinneed (talk) 01:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV?

Peter King has made a number of controversial comments and committed a few actions that were widely attacked during his time in Congress, and yet there is no mention of anything controversial on this page, presenting a very unbalanced picture. Earlier versions of this page included both King's legislative accomplishments and some of the controversial comments (e.g. endorsement of racial profiling, and condemning an opponent for accepting campaign contributions from an Islamic group which King himself had accepted an even greater donation from). The page has been vastly expanded since I last looked at it, and it has at the same time become far less neutral. 68.194.217.223 (talk) 05:15, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]