Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bov: Difference between revisions
SPCUClerkbot (talk | contribs) BOT updates, actions follow: (listing accounts notified) |
endorse |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
;CheckUser requests |
;CheckUser requests |
||
{{RFCU| A | No2ndletter | |
{{RFCU| A | No2ndletter | Endorse }} <small>Requested by [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 21:13, 21 April 2009 (UTC) </small> |
||
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter ##--> |
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter ##--> |
||
<!--## Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> |
<!--## Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> |
||
<!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##--> |
<!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##--> |
||
{{Endorse}} with a rider that as there is an ongoing issue of sock/meat puppets gaming the system on warnings, the case ought to be referred back to Arbcom for them to consider how they might revise their ruling in the light of evidence that it is being gamed. [[User:Mayalld|Mayalld]] ([[User talk:Mayalld|talk]]) 09:38, 22 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments |
;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments |
||
Revision as of 09:38, 22 April 2009
Bov
Bov (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bov/Archive.
Report date April 21 2009, 21:13 (UTC)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Arthur Warrington Thomas (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- CallmeMads (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
At WP:ARB9/11#Discretionary sanctions administrators were empowered to topic ban users from 9/11 articles to control disruption. A large number of accounts have been topic banned, yet a steady stream of new accounts appear repeating the same arguments to include the same rejected sources. These two accounts appear to be following that pattern. Please check if they are recycled users. At Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Huntdowntheconspiracists we found two groups of sock puppets and one group of meat puppets. Please compare these accounts to Bov, as well as the other accounts at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Huntdowntheconspiracists. For diffs, see recent contributions of these accounts pushing the Bentham journal and 911truth.org, such as [1] and [2]. Thank you. Jehochman Talk 21:13, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
- Comments by other users
- CheckUser requests
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: A (Arbcom ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status –
Endorsed for Checkuser attention. Requested by Jehochman Talk 21:13, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed with a rider that as there is an ongoing issue of sock/meat puppets gaming the system on warnings, the case ought to be referred back to Arbcom for them to consider how they might revise their ruling in the light of evidence that it is being gamed. Mayalld (talk) 09:38, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
- Conclusions