User talk:Forsena

September 2008

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Albanians. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.

Please stop removing sourced references to Kosovo from articles, and removing the reference to border with Kosovo from Republic of Macedonia. --Enric Naval (talk) 20:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

I don't know about any "fascist POV". I already made my arguments on Talk:Republic_of_Macedonia#Kosovo.3F, using the sources I could find. I don't find the mention of Kosovo as a bordering terrotory (it doesn't even say that it's a country) to be non-neutral. --Enric Naval (talk) 17:37, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

making aware of probation

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. Thank you. (please notice that I'm not an administrator myself) --Enric Naval (talk) 20:35, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Serbia's GDP data

Please, don't edit GDP data of Serbia. --Gggh (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Košare

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Battle of Košare, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

this article is based entirely on one partisan non-english source and a recent IP editor has suggested deleting it in the absence of any verification - see Talk:Battle of Košare#NATO_collusion

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Timberframe (talk) 18:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Serbs. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 22:21, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 22:24, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Please don't remove notes about how the population was calculated just because it mentions Kosovo. --Enric Naval (talk) 16:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Operational experience

Srpska Vojska je postojala do 1918,posle toga Jugoslovenska kraljevska Vojska,JNA,VJ,VSCG,i sve ratne aktivnosti pripadaju tim vojskama,gde sam i premestio bitke i ratne operacije,osim toga dokazano je pred sudom u Hagu da Srbija (SRJ) nije ucestvovala u ratu u Bosni.Vojska Srbije ponovo pocinje da postoji tek od 2006 god.88 godina kasnije kad su se ove bitke vodile u medjuvremenu pod drugim vojnim formacijama. pozdrav --Boksi (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Albanians (Evidence). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 22:41, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Notice of editing restrictions

File:Yellow warning.png

Notice: Under the terms of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren, any editor working on topics related to Eastern Europe, broadly defined, may be made subject to an editing restriction at the discretion of any uninvolved administrator. Should the editor make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he or she may be blocked for up to a week for each violation, and up to a month for each violation after the fifth. This restriction is effective on any editor following notice placed on his or her talk page. This notice is now given to you, and future violations of the provisions of this warning are subject to blocking.

Note: This notice is not effective unless given by an administrator and logged here.