User talk:Thrindel

Pronunciation

Not at all of any real importance, but is your username intended to be pronounced Thrindel, like "thimble", or Thrindel like the Spanish word "el"? GoatDoomOcculta (talk) 21:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Like 'thimble'--Thrindel (talk) 22:24, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Ctrl+Alt+Del

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ctrl+Alt+Del. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. You have made three reverts to the article now. I recommend you stop. Artichoker^[talk] 02:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

You're right, I will seek third part arbitration to prevent this from escalating further.--Thrindel (talk) 02:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Please retain a level of professionalism here. It is not a personal attack to state that you are extremely likely to be the creator of the content the PvP article describes and that you should refrain, as a source close to the material, from editing portions of the article not fact-related. Your edits to the criticism section of your own content especially fall in this category. I would like to also add, on a more personal level, that claims of personal attacks levied against an individual are in and of themselves personal attacks when they are groundless. - Kuzain (talk) 20:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Good Work

Well I don't know how many people you are pleasing, but I'm very happy that you keep an eye on Ctrl+Alt+Del, keep up the good work, and don't listen to anyone on the internet who has figured out the "scoop" on "who you really are" they clearly only have one track vandal minds. Edits are fleeting, bans are forever. Knowledgeum (talk) 07:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Bias against Pakistan

Is it islamophobia which drives editors against pakistan or just pro indian bias stop deleting pakistani history unfairly india was born in 1947 just like pakistan get that into your head. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.129.53 (talk) 20:38, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

It has nothing to do with "anti-Pakistani" this or "pro-Indian" that, it's about presenting straight facts in an encyclopedic article. Based on your edit summaries and edits, it seems more like you're the one with the cultural chip on your shoulder. I was simply undoing a removal of information that several other editors on the article seem to support. "To hell with India" [1] does not sound like unbiased editing to me. Taxila may be Pakistani now, but if it was once Indian (as my cursory research and sources already cited in the article suggests), that should be mentioned in the article as well, regardless of your feelings on India or your pride for Pakistan.--Thrindel (talk) 04:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

What do you mean India do you mean Hindustan, Bharat or british india this is a joke india came into exsistance in 1947 before then it was a land named 100 times so get your pro india bias out the way and stop your islamophobe attack on muslim nations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.158.177.226 (talk) 11:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Heh, again, I don't care about India or Pakistan. I've never been to either, I have heritage from neither, and I'm agnostic, so religion from either doesn't mean shit to me either. I was reverting what appeared to be biased removal of information that went against the majority opinion of other editors. This is strictly a Wikipedia information issue, stop bringing your personal feelings on race or religion into it. Get over it already.--Thrindel (talk) 17:56, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Multiple IP Addy Stalkers

You seem to have a nice little collection of stalkers going on right about now. Might I suggest a request to Wikipedia:RFCU to see if/how many of them are one and the same/open proxies as they all seem to have the exact same agenda against you at the moment. Otherwise I'll keep an eye out and if I see any more vandalism I'll do my best to keep up with it. If the vandals are mad at you thats all the reason to keep up the good work, vandals are rarely on the side of constructive collaberation so keep up the good work. Knowledgeum (talk) 06:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, I'll take a look. Thanks for your help and support, though. It's a shame that the article requires so much attention, I've yet to come across any other article with such a chronic problem of vandals throwing themselves at the exact same brick wall over and over again. And all over a webcomic? It doesn't make much sense. --Thrindel (talk) 07:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I can protect your talk page if you like. Just let me know. Kevin (talk) 10:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I've gone ahead, as there was a request at WP:RFPP. Let me know if you want it removed. Cheers Kevin (talk) 10:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

The likely source of all the ip vandals can be found in various comments on various websites. A google search for ctrl alt del Thrindel returns many comments with links to your page advertising "tell him your thoughts". This page may need a good long protection. Knowledgeum (talk) 10:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)