User talk:Piotrus: Difference between revisions
→Happy New Year!: new section |
→Duchies of śląskie: new section |
||
Line 200: | Line 200: | ||
Thank you for all your help, and Happy New Year! |
Thank you for all your help, and Happy New Year! |
||
[[User:Horlo|Horlo]] ([[User talk:Horlo|talk]]) 07:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC) |
[[User:Horlo|Horlo]] ([[User talk:Horlo|talk]]) 07:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Duchies of śląskie == |
|||
Thank you, P.P. for giving us such good laughs. Feel free to start some more article with a the name of a post-1945 Polish city, lacking of any content other than some medieval Piast family quarrels. -- [[User:Matthead|Matthead]] [[User_talk:Matthead|<font style="color:#ffff00;background:#0000cc;"><small> DisOuß </small></font>]] 11:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:22, 3 January 2008
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f9/Wikisanta.jpg/150px-Wikisanta.jpg)
![]() |
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you. |
---|
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance. |
---|
![Archive](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c2/Vista-file-manager.png/50px-Vista-file-manager.png)
Talk archives: Archive 1 (moved Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (moved Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (moved May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (moved July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (moved September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (moved November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (moved January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (moved 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (moved 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (moved 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (moved 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (moved 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (moved 28 October, 2006), Archive 14 (moved 27 December, 2006), Archive 15 (moved 4 February, 2007), Archive 16 (moved 20 March, 2007), Archive 17 (moved 17 May, 2007), Archive 18 (moved 30 July, 2007), Archive 19 (moved 25 September, 2007), Archive 20 (moved 5 November, 2007), Archive 21 (moved 2 January, 2008)
![]() ![]() If you have come here to place a request for a re-confirmation of my adminship, please note that I will either:
at my discretion
Sociocultural evolution FARSociocultural evolution has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. DYKWszystkiego najlepszego!![]() I would deeply appreciate it if you could help me arrange this article properly; not being a BattleTech fan myself, at least not yet, I I want to make sure its all set. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 15:48, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:BattleTech historyI have nominated Category:BattleTech history (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC) Polish UniversitiesIs there a uniform format for people associated with Polish Universities? Eg, in Category:Jagiellonian University, there is Category:Alumni of Jagiellonian University (though I think this would be better called Category:Jagiellonian University alumni), but no Category:Jagiellonian University faculty. On the other hand, Category:University of Warsaw has what I would expect in terms of faculty/alumni (for the longest of times, even that was not good, but it finally got fixed a couple of months ago). As for Warsaw University of Technology, it's a mess: no cat for the University per se, no cat for faculty (no one notable there since 1826?), only the poorly named Category:Alumni of Warsaw University of Technology, with a single alumnus (!). At any rate, I could go on, but let me stop. This is a bit frustrating, since I run all the time into articles where I would like to fit in such cats -- for some countries, this is very well done, for other much less so. I'm willing to help if there is interest in this, but I figure I'd better ask you first, see what you think. Have a happy 2008! Turgidson (talk) 18:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC) CfD nomination of Category:BattleTech planetsI have nominated Category:BattleTech planets (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC) Happy New Year!![]() I don't know who else to ask, but could you please look into the discussion there? Things are getting out of hand a bit, do we really have to put up with that kind of stuff, over and over? Thanks. Turgidson (talk) 23:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Happy New YearOn another note, I have informed the Signpost that you have broken Ghirla's DYK record.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Congratulations!I've just read the Signpost tipline. Fantastic! DurovaCharge! 08:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Thanks and Happy New YearFirstly, let me wish you a very happy New Year and thank you for all your help in the Milhist Tag & Assess 2007 drive.
Secondly, although the Tag & Assess 2007 drive is now officially closed, you are very welcome to continue tagging and assessing until 31 January 2008. Any articles you tag and assess during this time will be credited fully to your tagging tally for further award purposes. Thirdly, if you can find the time, it would be good to have your feedback/comments on the drive at the Tag & Assess workshop Thanks again for your help, --ROGER DAVIES talk 11:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Happy new year, and congratulations! · AndonicO Talk 12:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Warsaw Armoured Motorized BrigadeHi. I have finally expanded the Warsaw Armoured Motorized Brigade, but I think it is too late for DYK. Or perhaps not? Perhaps you could help out with nomination? Greetings and all the best in new year 2008. Tymek (talk) 17:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC) This article, to which you contributed, will be featured on the Main Page on January 5, 2008.[1] Risker (talk) 17:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gg first.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Gg first.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Volapük againHi Piotrus. Perhaps you've already noticed a new proposal against the Volapük Wikipedia: m:Proposals for closing projects/Radical cleanup of Volapük Wikipedia. In case you agree that this proposal is not a good idea, perhaps you could help us fight against it with your vote? Thanks! --Smeira (talk) 23:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Not quite what I meant - I meant that reporting on it was probably going to be in Polish, since I'm not aware of many English-language newspapers, etc, that report on books in foreign languages at all, and Polish is somewhat of a minority language. In other words - it's of interest to readers, but Wikipedia is breaking ground here to cover it pre-rtranslation (which I hope it gets), so the fellow criticising it for the references in Polish was wrong, as we should judge the quality of sourcing in the context of the Polish sci-fi scene, not apply the standards of the English sci-fi scene. Adam Cuerden talk 01:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC) new yearHey Piotrus, sorry for being late. I hope you have a great year. Ostap 05:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC) Happy New Year!Hello, I am sorry that my wish is belated, but that makes it no less heartfelt. Thank you for all your help, and Happy New Year! Horlo (talk) 07:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC) Duchies of śląskieThank you, P.P. for giving us such good laughs. Feel free to start some more article with a the name of a post-1945 Polish city, lacking of any content other than some medieval Piast family quarrels. -- Matthead DisOuß 11:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC) |