Rubik's Cube: Difference between revisions
m Reverted 1 edit by 64.45.251.50 identified as vandalism to last revision by Val42. using TW |
|||
Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
{{reflist|2}} |
{{reflist|2}} |
||
==External links== |
|||
{{commonscat|Rubik's cube}} |
|||
* [http://www.rubiks.com/ Rubik's official site] |
|||
* [http://www.worldcubeassociation.org World Cube Association (WCA)] |
|||
* [http://www.hungarianbookstore.com/rubik.htm Short Cube history and Erno Rubik biography] |
|||
* [http://cube2007.com Rubik's Cube. Algorithms, compositions, visual simulator] |
|||
{{Rubik's Cube}} |
|||
[[Category:Rubik's Cube| ]] |
|||
[[Category:Puzzles]] |
|||
[[Category:Mechanical puzzles]] |
|||
[[Category:1974 introductions]] |
|||
[[Category:Spiel des Jahres winners]] |
|||
[[Category:Educational toys]] |
|||
[[ar:مكعب روبيك]] |
|||
[[bn:রুবিক্স কিউব]] |
|||
[[bg:Куб на Рубик]] |
[[bg:Куб на Рубик]] |
||
[[cs:Rubikova kostka]] |
[[cs:Rubikova kostka]] |
Revision as of 15:58, 23 October 2007
Rubik's Cube (commonly misspelled rubix, rubick's or rubicscube) is a mechanical puzzle invented in 1974[1] by the Hungarian sculptor and professor of architecture Ernő Rubik. Originally called the "Magic Cube" by its inventor, this puzzle was renamed "Rubik's Cube" by Ideal Toys in 1980 [1] and also won the 1980 German "Game of the Year" (Spiel des Jahres) special award for Best Puzzle. It is said to be the world's best-selling toy, with some 300,000,000 Rubik's Cubes and imitations sold worldwide.[2]
Typically, the faces of the cube are covered by 9 stickers in 6 solid colours; there is one colour for each side of the cube. When the puzzle is solved, each face of the cube is a solid colour. The cube celebrated its twenty-fifth anniversary in 2005, when a special edition cube in a presentation box was released, featuring a sticker in the centre of the reflective face (which replaced the white face) with a "Rubik's Cube 1980-2005" logo.
The puzzle comes in four widely available versions: the 2×2×2 ("Pocket Cube"), the 3×3×3 standard cube, the 4×4×4 ("Rubik's Revenge"), and the 5×5×5 Quinn Hancock version ("Professor's Cube"). Recently, Greek inventor Panagiotis Verdes patented a method of creating cubes beyond the 5×5×5, up to 11×11×11 level. His designs, which include improved mechanisms for the 3×3×3, 4×4×4, and 5×5×5, are suitable for speed cubing, whereas existing designs for cubes larger than 3×3×3 are prone to breaking. As of June 1st, 2007, these designs are still being tested and are not widely available yet, although videos of actual, working prototypes for the 6×6×6 and 7×7×7 have been released.
Conception and development
In March 1970, Harry D. Nichols invented a 2x2x2 "Puzzle with Pieces Rotatable in Groups" and filed a Canadian patent application for it. Nichols' cube was held together with magnets. Nichols was granted U.S. patent 3,655,201 on April 11, 1972, two years before Rubik invented his improved cube.
On the 9th of April, 1970, Frank Fox invented and applied to patent "Spherical 3x3x3", he finally received his UK patent (1344259) on January 16th 1974, almost four years later but still before Ernõ Rubik received his.
Rubik invented his "Magic Cube" in 1974 and obtained Hungarian patent HU170062 for the Magic Cube in 1975 but did not take out international patents. The first test batches of the product were produced in late 1977 and released to Budapest toy shops. Magic Cube (later "Rubik's Cube") was held together with interlocking plastic pieces that were less expensive to produce than the magnets in Nichols' design. In September 1979, a deal was signed with Ideal Toys to bring the Magic Cube to the Western World, and the puzzle made its debut at toy fairs in January and February 1980.
After its international debut, the progress of the Cube towards the toy shop shelves of the West was briefly halted so that it could be manufactured to Western safety and packaging specifications. A lighter Cube was produced, and Ideal Toys decided to rename it. "The Gordian Knot" and "Inca Gold" were considered, but the company finally decided on "Rubik's Cube", and the first batch was exported from Hungary in May 1980. Taking advantage of an initial shortage of Cubes, many cheap imitations appeared.
Nichols assigned his patent to his employer Moleculon Research Corp which sued Ideal Toy Company in 1982. In 1984 Ideal lost the patent infringement suit and appealed. In 1986 the appeals court affirmed the judgment that Rubik's 2x2x2 Pocket Cube infringed Nichols' patent, but overturned the judgment on Rubik's 3x3x3 Cube.[3]
Even while Rubik's patent application was being processed, Terutoshi Ishigi, a self-taught engineer and ironworks-owner near Tokyo, filed for a Japanese patent in for a nearly identical mechanism, and was granted patent JP55‒8192 (1976); Ishigi's is generally accepted as an independent reinvention.[4][5][6]
Rubik applied for another Hungarian patent on October 28, 1980 and applied for other patents. In the United States, Rubik was granted U.S. patent 4,378,116 on March 29, 1983 for the Cube. Rubik also invented and patented several other puzzles which were not as popular as Rubik's Cube.
Popularity
Over one hundred million Rubik's Cubes were sold in the period from 1980 to 1982.[7] It won the BATR Toy of the Year award in 1980 and again in 1981. Ideal Toys published a Rubik's Cube Newsletter from 1982 to 1983.
Many similar puzzles were released shortly after the Rubik's Cube, both from Rubik himself and from other sources, including the Rubik's Revenge, a 4×4×4 version of the Rubik's Cube. There are also 2×2×2 and 5×5×5 Cubes (known as the Pocket Cube and the Professor's Cube, respectively) and puzzles in other shapes, such as the Pyraminx, a tetrahedron.
In May 2005, the Greek inventor Panagiotis Verdes constructed a 6×6×6 Rubik's Cube; on May 23 2006, Frank Morris, a world champion Rubik's Cube solver, tested this version. He had previously solved the 3×3×3 in 15 seconds, the 4×4×4 in 1 minute and 10 seconds, and the 5×5×5 in 1 minute and 46.1 seconds. The 6×6×6 took him 5 minutes and 37 seconds to solve. Morris himself thanked the inventor for making it and purportedly stated that the bigger the Cube is, the greater the pleasure. In July 2006, Mr. Verdes successfully constructed the 7×7×7 cube; on October 27 2006, a video of Morris testing the cube was released. He solved this cube in 6 minutes and 29.31 seconds. Videos of these tests can be viewed at http://www.olympicube.com.
In 1994, Melinda Green, Don Hatch, and Jay Berkenilt created a model of a 3×3×3×3 four-dimensional analogue of a Rubik's Cube called the MagicCube4D. Having more possible states than there are atoms in the known universe, only 55 people have solved it as of January 2007. [1] In 2006, Roice Nelson and Charlie Nevill created a 3×3×3×3×3 five-dimensional model. As of January 2007, it has been solved by only 7 people. [2]
In 1981, Patrick Bossert, a twelve-year-old schoolboy from England, published his own solution in a book called You Can Do the Cube (ISBN 0-14-031483-0). The book sold over 1.5 million copies worldwide in seventeen editions and became the number one book on The Times.[citation needed] He didn't reach the New York Times Best Seller list for that year [3].
At the height of the puzzle's popularity, separate sheets of coloured stickers were sold so that frustrated or impatient Cube owners could restore their puzzle to its original appearance.[8]
The name "Rubik's Cube" is common in many languages except in Chinese, Hebrew, Hungarian, German and Portuguese. In the former language, it is known as the "Hungarian Cube", whilst in the latter, its name is "Magic Cube" ("魔方" in Chinese, Bűvös kocka in Hungarian, Zauberwürfel in German and Cubo Mágico in Portuguese).
In 1982 at the World's Fair held in Knoxville, Tennessee, a 6 foot rotating cube was put on display at the World's Fair Park. After the fair, it was moved and forgotten until July 2007, when it was restored and placed in the Holiday Inn lobby that overlooks the park.
Workings
A standard Cube measures approximately 2¼ inches (5.7 cm) on each side. The puzzle consists of the twenty-six unique miniature cubes on the surface. However, the centre cube of each face is merely a single square façade; all are affixed to the core mechanisms. These provide structure for the other pieces to fit into and rotate around. So there are twenty-one pieces: a single core piece consisting of three intersecting axes holding the six centre squares in place but letting them rotate, and twenty smaller plastic pieces which fit into it to form the assembled puzzle. The Cube can be taken apart without much difficulty, typically by turning one side through a 45° angle and prying an "edge cube" away from a "centre cube" until it dislodges (however, prying loose a corner cube is a good way to break off a centre cube - thus ruining the cube). It is a simple process to solve a Cube by taking it apart and reassembling it in a solved state; however, this is not the challenge.
There are twelve edge pieces which show two coloured sides each, and eight corner pieces which show three colours. Each piece shows a unique colour combination, but not all combinations are present (for example, there is no edge piece with both red and orange sides, if red and orange are on opposite sides of the solved Cube.). The location of these cubes relative to one another can be altered by twisting an outer third of the Cube 90°, 180° or 270°, but the location of the coloured sides relative to one another in the completed state of the puzzle cannot be altered: it is fixed by the relative positions of the centre squares and the distribution of colour combinations on edge and corner pieces.
For most recent Cubes, the colours of the stickers are red opposite orange, yellow opposite white, and green opposite blue. However, cubes with alternative colour arrangements also exist, for example they might have yellow face opposite the green, and the blue face opposite the white (with red and orange opposite faces remaining unchanged).
Permutations
A normal (3×3×3) Rubik's Cube can have (8! × 38−1) × (12! × 212−1)/2 = 43,252,003,274,489,856,000 different positions (permutations), or about 4.3 × 1019, forty-three quintillion (short scale) or forty-three trillion (long scale). The puzzle is often advertised as having only "billions" of positions, as the larger numbers could be regarded as incomprehensible to many. Despite the vast number of positions, all Cubes can be solved in twenty-six or fewer moves (see Optimal solutions for Rubik's Cube).[9]
To put this into perspective, if every permutation of a 57 millimeter Rubik's Cube was lined up end to end, it would stretch out approximately 261 light years. If they were laid side by side, it would cover the Earth approximately 256 times.
In fact, there are (8! × 38) × (12! × 212) = 519,024,039,293,878,272,000 (about 519 quintillion on the short scale) possible arrangements of the pieces that make up the Cube, but only one in twelve of these are actually reachable. This is because there is no sequence of moves that will swap a single pair or rotate a single corner or edge cube. Thus there are twelve possible sets of reachable configurations, sometimes called "universes" or "orbits", into which the Cube can be placed by dismantling and reassembling it.
Centre faces
The original and still official Rubik's Cube has no orientation markings on the centre faces, and therefore solving it does not require any attention to correctly orienting those faces. If you have a marker pen, you could, for example, mark the central squares of an unshuffled Cube with four coloured marks on each edge, each corresponding to the colour of the adjacent face. Some Cubes have also been produced commercially with markings on all of the squares, such as the Lo Shu magic square or playing card suits. Thus one can scramble and then unscramble the Cube yet have the markings on the centres rotated, and it becomes an additional challenge to "solve" the centres as well. This is known as "supercubing"[citation needed].
Putting markings on the Rubik's Cube increases the challenge chiefly because it expands the set of distinguishable possible configurations. When the Cube is unscrambled apart from the orientations of the central squares, there will always be an even number of squares requiring a quarter turn. Thus there are 46/2 = 2,048 possible configurations of the centre squares in the otherwise unscrambled position, increasing the total number of possible cube permutations from 43,252,003,274,489,856,000 (4.3×1019) to 88,580,102,706,155,225,088,000 (8.9×1022).
Solutions
Many general solutions for the Rubik's Cube have been discovered independently. The most popular method was developed by David Singmaster and published in the book Notes on Rubik's Magic Cube in 1980. This solution involves solving the Cube layer by layer, in which one layer, designated the top, is solved first, followed by the middle layer, and then the final and bottom layer. After practice, solving the Cube layer by layer can be done in under one minute. Other general solutions include "corners first" methods or combinations of several other methods.
Speedcubing solutions have been developed for solving the Rubik's Cube as quickly as possible. The most common speedcubing solution was developed by Jessica Fridrich. It is a very efficient layer-by-layer method that requires a large number of algorithms, especially for orienting and permuting the last layer. The first layer corners and second layer are done simultaneously, with each corner paired up with a second-layer edge piece. Another well-known method was developed by Lars Petrus. In this method, a 2×2×2 section is solved first, followed by a 2x2x3, and then the incorrect edges are solved using a 3 move algorithm, which eliminates the need for a 32 move algorithm later. One of the advantages of this method is that it tends to give solutions in fewer moves. For this reason the method is also popular for fewest move competitions.
Solutions typically follow a series of steps, and include a set of algorithms for solving each step. An algorithm, also known as a process or an operator, is a series of twists that accomplishes a particular goal. For instance, one algorithm might switch the locations of three corner pieces, while leaving the rest of the pieces in place. Basic solutions require learning as few as 4 or 5 algorithms but are generally inefficient, needing around 100 twists on average to solve an entire cube. In comparison, Fridrich's advanced solution requires learning 53+ algorithms, but allows the cube to be solved in only 55 moves on average. A different kind of solution developed by Ryan Heise uses no algorithms but rather teaches a set of underlying principles that can be used to solve in fewer than 40 moves. A number of complete solutions can also be found in any of the books listed in the bibliography, and most can be used to solve any Cube in under five minutes.
The search for optimal solutions
The manual solution methods described above are intended to be easy to learn, but much effort has gone into finding even faster solutions to Rubik's Cube. In 1982, David Singmaster and Alexander Frey hypothesized that the number of moves needed to solve Rubik's Cube, given an ideal algorithm, might be in "the low twenties". In 2007, Daniel Kunkle and Gene Cooperman used computer search methods to demonstrate that any 3x3x3 Rubik's Cube configuration can be solved in a maximum of 26 moves. [10] [11] Work continues to try to reduce the upper bound on optimal solutions to 25 moves, or even lower. The arrangement known as the super-flip (U R2 F B R B2 R U2 L B2 R U' D' R2 F R' L B2 U2 F2), where every edge is in its correct position but flipped, requires 20 moves to be solved. No arrangement of the Rubik's cube has been discovered so far that requires more than 20 moves to solve.
Move notation
Most 3×3×3 Rubik's Cube solution guides use the same notation, originated by David Singmaster, to communicate sequences of moves. This is generally referred to as "cube notation" or in some literature "Singmaster notation" (or variations thereof). Its relative nature allows algorithms to be written in such a way that they can be applied regardless of which side is designated the top or how the colours are organized on a particular cube.
- F (Front): the side currently facing you
- B (Back): the side opposite the front
- U (Up): the side above or on top of the front side
- D (Down): the side opposite the top, underneath the cube
- L (Left): the side directly to the left of the front
- R (Right): the side directly to the right of the front
- x (rotate): rotate the cube up
- y (rotate): rotate the cube to the left
- z (rotate): rotate the cube on its side to the right
When an apostrophe follows a letter, it means to turn the face counter-clockwise a quarter-turn, while a letter without an apostrophe means to turn it a quarter-turn clockwise. Such an apostrophe mark is pronounced prime. A letter followed by a 2 (occasionally superscript) means to turn the face a half-turn (the direction does not matter). Lowercase letters indicate that you should move that face and the face next to it. So R' is right side counter-clockwise, but r' is right side and center side next to it counter-clockwise. When x y or z are primed, simply rotate the cube in the opposite direction. When they are squared, rotate it twice. For z, you should still be viewing the same front face when rotating.
This notation can also be used on the Pocket Cube, the Revenge, and the Professor, with additional notation. They not only have the F, B, L, R, U, D notation but also f, b, l, r, u, d. For example: (Rr)' l2 f'
(Some solution guides, including Ideal's official publication, The Ideal Solution, use slightly different conventions. Top and Bottom are used rather than Up and Down for the top and bottom faces, with Back being replaced by Posterior. + indicates clockwise rotation and - counterclockwise, with ++ representing a half-turn. However, alternative notations failed to catch on, and today the Singmaster scheme is used universally by those interested in the puzzle.)
Less often used moves include rotating the entire cube or two-thirds of it. The letters x, y, and z are used to indicate that the entire Cube should be turned about one of its axes. The X-axis is the line that passes through the left and right faces, the Y-axis is the line that passes through the up and down faces, and the Z-axis is the line that passes through the front and back faces. (This type of move is used infrequently in most solutions, to the extent that some solutions simply say "stop and turn the whole cube upside-down" or something similar at the appropriate point.)
Lowercase letters f, b, u, d, l, and r signify to move the first two layers of that face while keeping the remaining layer in place. This is of course equivalent to rotating the whole cube in that direction, then rotating the opposite face back the same amount in the opposite direction, but is useful notation to describe certain triggers for speedcubing. Furthermore, M, E, and S (and respectively their lowercase for larger sized cubes), are used for inner-slice movements. M signifies turning the layer that is between L and R downward (clockwise if looking from the left side). E signifies turning the layer between U and D towards the right (counter-clockwise if looking from the top). S signifies turning the layer between F and B clockwise.
For example, the algorithm (or operator, or sequence) F2 U' R' L F2 R L' U' F2, which cycles three edge cubes in the top layer without affecting any other part of the cube, means:
- Turn the Front face 180 degrees
- Turn the Up face 90 degrees counterclockwise
- Turn the Right face 90 degrees counterclockwise
- Turn the Left face 90 degrees clockwise
- Turn the Front face 180 degrees
- Turn the Right face 90 degrees clockwise
- Turn the Left face 90 degrees counterclockwise
- Turn the Up face 90 degrees counterclockwise
- Finally, turn the front face 180 degrees.
For beginning students of the cube, this notation can be daunting, and many solutions available online therefore incorporate animations that demonstrate the algorithms presented.
4×4×4 and larger cubes use slightly different notation to incorporate the middle layers. Generally speaking, upper case letters (FBUDLR) refer to the outermost portions of the cube (called faces). Lower case letters (fbudlr) refer to the inner portions of the cube (called slices). Again Ideal breaks rank by describing their 4×4×4 solution in terms of layers (vertical slices that rotate about the Z-axis), tables (horizontal slices), and books (vertical slices that rotate about the X-axis).
Competitions and record times
Many speedcubing competitions have been held to determine who can solve the Rubik's Cube in the shortest time. The number of contests are going up every year; there were 72 official competitions from 2003-2006, of which 33 were in 2006 alone.
The first world championship organized by the Guinness Book of World Records was held in Munich on March 13, 1981. All cubes were moved 40 times and rubbed with petroleum jelly. Official winner with a record of 38 seconds was Jury Froeschl, born in Munich.
The first international world championship was held in Budapest on June 5, 1982 and was won by Minh Thai, a Vietnamese student from Los Angeles, with a time of 22.93 seconds.
Since 2003, competitions are decided by the best average (middle three of 5 attempts); but the single best time of all tries is also recorded. The World Cube Association maintains a history of world records. In 2004, the WCA made it mandatory to use a special timing device called a Stackmat timer.
The current world records for both average and single timings were set in 2007:
- Average time: Yu Jeong-Min of Korea set an average of 11.76 seconds, on January 7, 2007, at the KCRC Championship in Seoul, South Korea, a significant gain on the earlier record of 13.22 seconds by Anssi Vanhala of Finland in Svekub 2006 (March).
- Single time: Erik Akkersdijk of The Netherlands set the best time of 9.77 seconds in the finals of the Dutch Open 2007 held on October 13/14, overtaking the previous best time of 9.86 seconds set by Thibaut Jacquinot of France set at the Spanish Open a few months earlier. Interestingly, in the final of the Dutch Open, Erik was edged out by Joël van Noort by 1.11 seconds on average time, though he still has the Dutch average record of 13.17 seconds average set at Czech Open 2007.
Many individuals have recorded shorter times, but these records are not accepted due to possible lack of compliance with standards.
Alternative competitions
In addition, informal alternative competitions have been held, challenging participants to solve the cube under unusual situations. These include:
- Blindfolded solving[12]
- Solving the cube with one person blindfolded and the other person saying what moves to do, known as "Team Blindfold".
- Solving the cube underwater in a single breath[13]
- Solving the cube using a single hand[14]
- Solving the cube with your feet[15]
Custom built puzzles
A lot of puzzles have been built in the past resembling the Rubik's cube or just its working (as a permutation puzzle). For example, a "Cuboid" is a Rubik's cube extended with one or more extra layers, which are glued or fused onto it. Since the extra layer is not functional the cube will function like the original cube, although in some cases the extra pieces do place additional constraints on the moves that can be used. People often make extended cubes thanks to the unique shapes they can form. The most common extended cube is the 3x3x5 (extended) cube.
Rubik's Cube software
Several computer programs have been written to perform various functions, such as among other things, solving the cube or animating it. In general, these programs can be considered to fall in one of several categories:
- Timers
- Solvers
- Graphical programs
- Animations
- Image generators
- Analyzers
Some of the software handles not only the 3x3x3 cube, but also other puzzle types. There is even software for virtual puzzles that do not have a real life counterpart. Example are the 4-dimensional cube and the gliding cube.
In addition these programs may also record player metrics, store and generate scrambled cube positions of offer either animations or online competition. Solvers are usually given a scramble, after which a solution is generated automatically. Graphical programs can generate a static image or animate the cube and its motions, e.g. using Java or Flash. Programs may also analyze sequences of moves and transform them to other notations or give player metrics.
For examples of such programs see List of Rubik's Cube software.
Rubik's Cube in popular culture
- It won a Spiel des Jahres Best Puzzle prize in 1980.
- From 1983 to 1984 a Saturday morning cartoon produced by Ruby-Spears, based upon the toy Rubik, the Amazing Cube, aired on the American Broadcasting Company as part of a package program, "The Pac-Man/Rubik, The Amazing Cube Hour".
- Saturday Night Live has had two commercial parodies for Rubik's cube-esque products: Rubik's Teeth (a pair of dentures that are multicoloured like a Rubik's cube) and Rubik's Grenade (a live hand grenade with a Rubik's cube puzzle on the side that explodes if the puzzle isn't solved correctly)
- In one episode on the NBC show The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, Will Smith solves a Rubik's Cube, impressing a college interviewer.
- In the movie The Pursuit of Happyness, Will Smith's character solves a Rubik's Cube during a cab ride and impresses a potential boss. Smith was trained by Tyson Mao.
- In the 1980's the Barron Knights released a novelty song about the cube, called "Mr Rubik".
- In the film The Wedding Singer, Holly (Christine Taylor) becomes frustrated with a Rubik's Cube and says, "Ugh, no one will ever solve this thing."
- In the film "Dude, Where's My Car" Chester is obsessed with his Rubik's Cube throughout the film. At the film's conclusion, he solves it and discovers that it is the highly coveted continuum transfunctioner.
- In the 2003 country music song 19 Somethin', Mark Wills, during the verse about the 1980s, sings that he "Took the stickers off of my Rubik's Cube" as a reference to one method of solving the cube by unconventional means.
- In an episode of Whatever Happened to Robot Jones, the plot device is a Rubik's Cube. (Called the wonder cube in the episode.) Robot Jones has to win a cube contest before his rivals, the Yogman Twins can.
- In several episodes of the TV show Numb3rs, an unsolved Rubik's cube (usually of standard 3x3x3 or Professor's 5x5x5 size) is shown in Charlie Eppes' office.
- In the 2004 movie Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy, a 2x2x2 Rubik's Pocket Cube can be seen on Brian Fantana's desk.
- In the television show, "Code Monkeys" on G4 in the episode "Super Prison Breakout", Larrity is showing Dean his bunker and he brags about a Rubiks Cube he mounted where he had 3 red pieces lined vertically.
- In a season 2 episode of Psych, Shawn Spencer is attempting to solve a Rubik's Cube while working at a newspaper.
References
- Handbook of Cubik Math by Alexander H. Frey, Jr. and David Singmaster
- Notes on Rubik's 'Magic Cube' ISBN 0-89490-043-9 by David Singmaster
- Metamagical Themas by Douglas R. Hofstadter contains two insightful chapters regarding Rubik's Cube and similar puzzles, originally published as articles in the March 1981 and July 1982 issues of Scientific American.
- Four-Axis Puzzles by Anthony E. Durham.
- Mathematics of the Rubik's Cube Design ISBN 0-8059-3919-9 by Hana M. Bizek
Notes
- ^ a b http://www.rubiks.com/lvl3/index_lvl3.cfm?lan=eng&lvl1=inform&lvl2=medrel&lvl3=history
- ^ Marshall, Ray. Squaring up to the Rubik challenge. icNewcastle. Retrieved August 15 2005.
- ^ Moleculon Research Corporation v. CBS, Inc.
- ^ Hofstadter, Douglas R. (1985). Metamagical Themas. Basic Books.Hofstadter gives the name as "Ishige".
- ^ http://cubeman.org/cchrono.txt
- ^ http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa040497.htm
- ^ http://www.rubiks.com/lvl3/index_lvl3.cfm?lan=eng&lvl1=inform&lvl2=medrel&lvl3=cubfct
- ^ Tim Walsh: "Timeless Toys: Classic Toys And the Playmakers Who Created Them" p233 ISBN 10: 0-7407-5571-4
- ^
Kunkle, D. (2007). "Twenty-Six Moves Suffice for Rubik's Cube" (PDF). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (ISSAC '07). ACM Press.
{{cite conference}}
: Unknown parameter|booktitle=
ignored (|book-title=
suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^
Kunkle, D. (2007). "Twenty-Six Moves Suffice for Rubik's Cube" (PDF). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (ISSAC '07). ACM Press.
{{cite conference}}
: Unknown parameter|booktitle=
ignored (|book-title=
suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Julie J. Rehmeyer. "Cracking the Cube". MathTrek. Retrieved 2007-08-09.
- ^ Rubik's 3x3x3 Cube: Blindfolded records
- ^ Rubik's Cube 3x3x3: Underwater
- ^ Rubik's 3x3x3 Cube: One-handed
- ^ Rubik's 3x3x3 Cube: With feet